目的探讨白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、IL-8在新生儿败血症诊断中的临床价值。方法采用前瞻性研究设计,选取2014年8月至2015年2月患感染性疾病的新生儿共140例(败血症组49例,局部感染组91例)为研究对象,非感染性疾病的新生儿61例作为对照组,比较各组治疗前及治疗3 d后血清中IL-6和IL-8水平的差异,分析各指标诊断新生儿败血症的价值。结果治疗前败血症组IL-6、IL-8水平均高于局部感染组和对照组,IL-6和IL-8在局部感染组中水平均高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗3 d后,败血症组IL-6水平均高于局部感染组和对照组,局部感染组IL-6水平高于对照组(P<0.05),IL-8在各组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前ROC曲线分析显示:当IL-6取32 pg/mL时,敏感度、特异度和准确性分别为87.8%、79.6%、81.6%;当IL-8取54 pg/mL时,敏感度、特异度和准确性分别为77.6%、63.8%、67.2%;IL-6+IL-8联合诊断时,敏感度、特异度和准确性分别为71.4%、86.2%、82.6%。结论 IL-6、IL-8参与炎症反应,且两者水平与感染严重程度相关,IL-6诊断新生儿败血症的价值高于IL-8,且两者联合应用可提高新生儿败血症诊断的准确性。
Abstract
Objective To explore the significance of interleukin-6(IL-6) and IL-8 in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Methods This was a prospective study conducted between August 2014 and February 2015. A total of 140 neonates who were suspected infectious were enrolled and classified into a sepsis group (n=49) and a local infection group (n=91). Sixty-one neonates who were non-infectious served as the control group. Serum levels of IL-6 and IL-8 were measured before treatment and 3 days after treatment. The value of serum IL-6 and IL-8 for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Before treatment, serum levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in the sepsis group were higher than those in the local infection and control groups (P<0.05), and the local infection group had higher serum levels of IL-6 and IL-8 than the control group (P<0.05). After three days of treatment, the serum IL-6 level in the sepsis group remained higher than that in the local infection and control groups (P<0.05), and the local infection group had higher serum level of IL-6 than the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the serum IL-8 level among the three groups. According to the ROC curve, when the cut-off value of serum IL-6 was 32 pg/mL, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of serum IL-6 for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis were 87.8%, 79.6% and 81.6% respectively; when the cut-off value of serum IL-8 was 54 pg/mL, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of serum IL-6 for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis were 77.6%, 63.8% and 67.2% respectively. With the combination of serum IL-6 and IL-8 levels, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis were 71.4%, 86.2% and 82.6% respectively. Conclusions IL-6 and IL-8 participate in the inflammatory response and the serum levels of both vary with the severity of infection. The diagnostic value of IL-6 for neonatal sepsis is higher than IL-8. The combined detection of serum levels IL-6 and IL-8 may increase the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.
关键词
白细胞介素-6 /
白细胞介素-8 /
败血症 /
新生儿
Key words
Interlukin-6 /
Interleukin-8 /
Sepsis /
Neonate
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王政力, 余加林. 新生儿败血症诊断新进展[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2013, 15(3):236-241.
[2] Qazi SA, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis:a major global public health challenge[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2009, 28(1 Suppl):S1-S2.
[3] 汪盈, 杨祖钦, 孙忠敏, 等. 血清淀粉酶A蛋白、中性粒细胞表面抗原CD64在新生儿败血症中的诊断价值[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2013, 31(6):526-529.
[4] 郑婧, 李莉, 蔺丽慧. IL-6、IL-8、CD64和CD11b检测对新生儿感染性疾病的诊断价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2015, 12(5):591-593.
[5] Meem M, Modak JK, Mortuza R, et al. Biomarkers for diagnosis of neonatal infections:A systematic analysis of their potential as a point-of-care diagnostics[J]. J Glob Health, 2011, 1(2):201-209.
[6] 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组, 《中华医学会中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 新生儿败血症诊疗方案[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2003, 41(12):897-899.
[7] 邵肖梅, 叶鸿瑁, 丘小汕. 实用新生儿学[M]. 第4版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011:347-351, 401-408, 467-472.
[8] Su H, Chang SS, Han CM, et al. Inflammatory markers in cord blood or maternal serum for early detection of neonatal sepsis-a systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Perinatol, 2014, 34(4): 268-274.
[9] 项文娜, 黄雨茅, 吴亮. 早产儿感染诊断中检测白介素-6、白介素-8、白介素-10的临床价值[J]. 中国医刊, 2013, 48(5):91-93.
[10] 陈霞, 姜春明. 新生儿败血症诊断指标的研究进展[J]. 国际儿科学杂志, 2013, 40(2):148-151.
[11] Shahkar L, Keshtkar A, Mirfazeli A, et al. The role of IL-6 for predicting neonatal sepsis:a systematic review and metaanalysis[J]. Iran J Pediatr, 2011, 21(4):411-417.
[12] Boskabadi H, Maamouri G, Tavakol Afshari J, et al. Evaluation of serum interleukins-6, 8 and 10 levels as diagnostic markers of neonatal infection and possibility of mortality[J]. Iran J Basic Med Sci, 2013, 16(12):1232-1237.
[13] Boskabadi H, Maamouri G, Afshari JT, et al. Serum interleukin 8 level as a diagnostic marker in late neonatal sepsis[J]. Iran J Pediatr, 2010, 20(1):41-47.
[14] Kurokawa CS, Hashimoto M, de Souza Rugolo LM, et al. Cord blood cytokine levels in focal early-onset neonatal infection after preterm premature rupture of membranes[J]. Turk J Pediatr, 2013, 55(6):598-605.
[15] Hatzidaki E, Gourgiotis D, Manoura A, et al. Interleukin-6 in preterm premature rupture of membranes as an indicator of neonatal outcome[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2005, 84(7): 632-638.