Screening results and genetic features of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in 54 025 preterm infants in Chengdu, China

JIANG Zhou, WANG Mei, TANG Li, LI Xiao-Li, LI Chun-Rong, CHENG Xin-Ran

Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5) : 482-487.

PDF(1361 KB)
PDF(1361 KB)
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5) : 482-487. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2012012
CLINICAL RESEARCH

Screening results and genetic features of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in 54 025 preterm infants in Chengdu, China

  • JIANG Zhou1, WANG Mei1, TANG Li2, LI Xiao-Li1, LI Chun-Rong2, CHENG Xin-Ran3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To analyze the screening results of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency and gene mutation distribution of G6PD deficiency in preterm infants in Chengdu, China, in order to provide a basis for the improvement of G6PD screening process in preterm infants. Methods Fluorescent spot test for G6PD deficiency using dried blood spots was used for G6PD screening of 54 025 preterm infants born from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 in Chengdu, and G6PD enzymology and gene detection were used for the diagnosis of 213 infants with positive screening results. Results Among the 54 025 preterm infants, 192 were diagnosed with G6PD deficiency, with an incidence rate of 3.55‰. The incidence rate of G6PD deficiency in preterm infants was higher than that in full-term infants in the same period of time and tended to increase year by year. Birth in summer, gestational age <32 weeks, and birth weight <2 500 g were influencing factors for the increase in false positive rate of screening (P < 0.05). The diagnostic accordance rate of genetic tests was significantly higher than that of enzyme activity assay in female infants (P < 0.05). Nine gene mutations were detected in Chengdu, without compound heterozygous mutation. Homozygous mutation was not detected in female infants. In the 80 infants with gene mutations, the top three gene mutations were c.1388G>A in 26 infants (32%), c.1376G>T in 21 infants (26%), and c.1024C>T in 13 infants (16%), accounting for 75%. There was a significant difference in pathogenicity grading among the three gene mutations (P < 0.001). The pairwise comparison showed that c.1024C>T had a significantly lower pathogenicity grade than c.1376G>T and c.1388G>A (P < 0.0167), suggesting that c.1376G>T and c.1388G>A had greater influence on enzyme activity than c.1024C>T. Conclusions Screening for G6PD deficiency in preterm infants should be taken seriously. It is recommended to apply cold-chain transportation of samples in summer to reduce the false positive rate of primary screening for G6PD deficiency. Genetic tests should be promoted in girls with positive screening results to improve the detection rate of G6PD deficiency in preterm female infants. There are various types of gene mutations in preterm infants with G6PD deficiency in Chengdu, and infants with c.1024C>T mutation tend to have mild conditions.

Key words

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency / Neonatal screening / Gene mutation / Preterm infant

Cite this article

Download Citations
JIANG Zhou, WANG Mei, TANG Li, LI Xiao-Li, LI Chun-Rong, CHENG Xin-Ran. Screening results and genetic features of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in 54 025 preterm infants in Chengdu, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2021, 23(5): 482-487 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2012012

References

[1] 中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专业委员会新生儿筛查学组, 中国医师协会医学遗传医师分会临床生化遗传专业委员会, 中国医师协会青春期医学专业委员会临床遗传学组. 葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症新生儿筛查、诊断和治疗专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2017, 55(6):411-414.
[2] 政策法规司. 《新生儿疾病筛查管理办法》(卫生部令第64号)[EB/OL]. (2009-03-05). http://www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm?id=39322.
[3] Minucci A, Giardina B, Zuppi C, et al. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase laboratory assay:how, when, and why?[J]. IUBMB Life, 2009, 61(1):27-34.
[4] 陶子馨, 朱安娜, 杨芳. 葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症研究进展[J]. 中国产前诊断杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(3):49-53.
[5] 贾雪芳, 李蓓, 蒋翔, 等. 广州市2015年新生儿葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症筛查结果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(10):2131-2133.
[6] 刘秀莲, 王洁, 黄慈丹, 等. 海口地区新生儿G6PD基因突变分析[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2017, 9(3):165-167.
[7] 罗超, 陈少科, 李旺, 等. 广西南宁地区新生儿G6PD缺乏症筛查情况分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2016, 24(9):66.
[8] 杨丽涓, 欧明才, 张钰, 等. 四川省新生儿葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶筛查回顾性分析[J]. 四川医学, 2019, 40(10):981-985.
[9] Luzzatto L, Nannelli C, Notaro R. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency[J]. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2016, 30(2):373-393.
[10] 何卫兰, 唐芳, 鄢力, 等. 成都市20年新生儿苯丙酮尿症分析[J]. 江苏医药, 2016, 42(3):310-311.
[11] 缪海霞, 张婷, 方可欣, 等. 浙江省葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症筛查结果现状分析[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2019, 37(9):706-709.
[12] 方可欣, 尚世强, 杨建滨, 等. 干滤纸血片制备环境的理化因素对实验结果的影响[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2017, 35(6):429-433.
[13] 张树英, 曾贵祥. 葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺陷新生儿高胆红素血症研究进展[J]. 内科, 2018, 13(4):616-619.
[14] 张志泉, 金润铭. 蚕豆病的诊疗现状[J]. 中国小儿血液与肿瘤杂志, 2010, 15(1):3-4.
[15] 周慧, 朴文花, 詹小芬, 等. 宁夏银川回族G6PD缺乏症发生率及突变谱研究[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2016, 24(2):25-27.
[16] 徐芸, 罗建明. 我国G6PD缺乏症基因突变的研究现状[J]. 中国小儿血液与肿瘤杂志, 2009, 14(3):143-145.
[17] 彭瑛, 詹小亭, 邓正华, 等. 中国西南三区216例儿童葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症基因型分布和临床特征分析[J]. 广东医学, 2019, 40(13):1856-1860.
[18] Minucci A, Moradkhani K, Hwang MJ, et al. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) mutations database:review of the "old" and update of the new mutations[J]. Blood Cells Mol Dis, 2012, 48(3):154-165.
[19] Yan JB, Xu HP, Xiong C, et al. Rapid and reliable detection of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) gene mutations in Han Chinese using high-resolution melting analysis[J]. J Mol Diagn, 2010, 12(3):305-311.
[20] Mesner O, Hammerman C, Goldschmidt D, et al. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in male premature and term neonates[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2004, 89(6):F555-F557.

PDF(1361 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/