PDF(1335 KB)
Effect of different feeding initiation formulas on very low birth weight infants
LI Xue-Mei, JIANG Jing, WU Yan, LI Xiu-Lan, CHEN Gong-Xue
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (8) : 777-782.
PDF(1335 KB)
PDF(1335 KB)
Effect of different feeding initiation formulas on very low birth weight infants
Objective To explore the effect of feeding initiation with different formulas on the growth, development, and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight infants. Methods A total of 86 preterm infants with a gestational age of < 34 weeks and a birth weight of < 1 500 g were divided into three groups according to their feeding initiation formulas:standard preterm formula feeding group (SPF group; n=31), extensively hydrolyzed protein formula feeding group (eHF group; n=27), and breastfeeding group (control group; n=28). Comparisons were made between the groups in terms of growth indices, feeding condition, blood biochemistry, length of hospital stay, and incidence rates of feeding intolerance, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and extrauterine growth retardation (EUGR). Results There were no significant differences among the above three groups in body weight, head circumference, and rate of increase in body length measured during hospitalization, as well as length of hospital stay and EUGR incidence rate at discharge (P > 0.05). The SPF and eHF groups had a significantly shorter transition time from meconium to yellow stool than the control group (P < 0.01). The SPF group had a significantly shorter time to standard enteral feeding than the eHF and control groups (P < 0.01), with no significant difference observed between the latter two groups. The SPF group had a significantly lower serum prealbumin level than the eHF and control groups (P < 0.01). The SPF and eHF groups had a significantly higher hemoglobin level at discharge than the control group (P < 0.01). The percentage of eosinophils at discharge was significantly lower in the eHF group than in the SPF group (P < 0.01). No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding the incidence rates of feeding intolerance, sepsis, and NEC (P > 0.05). Conclusions Both eHF and SPF can be used for feeding initiation for very low birth weight preterm infants with a gestational age of < 34 weeks without increasing the incidence rate of EUGR.
Standard preterm formula / Extensively protein hydrolyzed formula / Breast milk / Very low birth weight infant
[1] 中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会营养专业委员会, 中国医师协会儿童健康专业委员会母乳库学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 新生儿重症监护病房推行早产儿母乳喂养的建议[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2016, 54(1):13-16.
[2] 王晨, 王丹华. 早产儿母乳喂养的益处和挑战(摘译)[J]. 中国新生儿科杂志, 2006, 21(2):121.
[3] 黄希, 陈琼, 彭文涛. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床特征及其危险因素[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2018, 43(7):797-804.
[4] 袁贵龙, 李龙生, 潘炜祺, 等. 深度水解蛋白粉喂养对早产儿胃食管反流的疗效观察[J]. 吉林医学, 2018, 39(12):2363-2364.
[5] 顾春燕, 蒋慧芬, 王金秀. 深度水解蛋白配方奶喂养对极低/超低出生体重儿生长发育的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2017, 19(8):852-855.
[6] 中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会儿科协作组, 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组, 中华医学会小儿外科学分会新生儿学组. 中国新生儿营养支持临床应用指南[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2013, 31(12):1177-1181.
[7] Dutta S, Singh B, Chessell L, et al. Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants[J]. Nutrients, 2015, 7(1):423-442.
[8] 王晨, 王丹华. 母乳强化剂在母乳喂养早产儿中的应用[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2009, 27(3):259-263.
[9] Kuzma-O'Reilly B, Duenas ML, Greecher C, et a1. Evaluation, development, and implementation of potentially better practices in neonatal intensive care nutrition[J]. Pediatrics, 2003, 111(4 Pt 2):e461-e470.
[10] 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组, 中华医学会中华儿科杂志编辑委员会. 新生儿败血症诊疗方案[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2003, 41(12):897-899.
[11] 邵肖梅, 叶鸿瑁, 丘小汕. 实用新生儿学[M]. 第4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2011:477-482.
[12] 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会, 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组, 中华医学会儿科学分会儿童保健学组. 早产/低出生体重儿喂养建议[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2009, 47(7):508-510.
[13] 母乳强化剂应用研究协作组.母乳强化剂在早产儿母乳喂养中应用的多中心研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2012, 50(5):336-342.
[14] 吴艳, 钟晓云, 蒋静, 等. 住院早产超低和极低出生体重儿强化母乳喂养的前瞻性对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1):143-148.
[15] Yu VY. Extrauterine growth restriction in preterm infants:importance of optimizing nutrition in neonatal intensive care units[J]. Croat Med J, 2005, 46(5):737-743.
[16] Maggio L, Zuppa AA, Sawatzki G, et al. Higher urinary excretion of essential amino acids in preterm infants fed protein hydrolysates[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2005, 94(1):75-84.
[17] Picaud JC, Rigo J, Normand S, et al. Nutritional efficacy of preterm formula with a partially hydrolyzed protein source:a randomized pilot study[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2001, 32(5):555-561.
[18] Mihatsch WA, Franz AR, Högel J, et al. Hydrolyzed protein accelerates feeding advancement in very low birth weight infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2002, 110(6):1199-1203.
[19] 张菊弟, 欧伟明, 邓明红, 等. 深度水解蛋白配方奶粉对牛奶蛋白过敏性哮喘患儿的效果[J]. 白求恩医学杂志, 2016, 14(5):564-566.
[20] Picaud JC. Formula-fed preterm neonates[J]. Minerva Pediatr, 2003, 55(3):217-229.
[21] Cardoso LE, Falção MC. Nutritional assessment of very low birth weight infants:relationships between anthropometric and biochemical parameters[J]. Nutr Hosp, 2007, 22(3):322-329.
[22] 王静, 杜逸亭, 叶正蔚. 深度水解蛋白配方奶治疗早产儿喂养不耐受的疗效观察[J]. 四川医学, 2014, 35(1):30-32.
[23] 胡玉莲, 夏世文. 深度水解蛋白配方奶对极低出生体质量儿喂养的影响[J]. 实用儿科临床杂志, 2011, 26(14):1091-1092.
