Objective To study the clinical characteristics of ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization at various sites in infants with shock, and to explore how to quickly select the site for central venous puncture in infants with shock. Methods The medical data of 112 infants who were diagnosed with shock and underwent central venous catheterization in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Dongguan Children's Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, from January 2016 to December 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into an ultrasound group (n=70) and a body surface location group (n=42) according to whether the catheterization was carried out under ultrasound guidance. The application of ultrasound-guided catheterization at various sites in infants was summarized and analyzed, and the success rate of one-time puncture, overall success rate, catheterization time, and complications were compared between these sites. Results Compared with the body surface location group, the ultrasound group had a significantly higher success rate of one-time puncture, a significantly shorter catheterization time, and a significantly reduced incidence rate of complications in internal jugular vein and femoral vein catheterizations (P<0.05). In the ultrasound group, the proportion of internal jugular vein catheterization was the highest (51%, 36/70), followed by femoral vein catheterization (33%, 23/70), and subclavian vein catheterization (16%, 11/70). For the comparison between different puncture sites under ultrasound guidance, internal jugular vein catheterization showed the shortest time of a successful catheterization [5.5 (5.0, 6.5) minutes] (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of complications among the different puncture sites groups (P>0.05). Conclusions In infants with shock, ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization can be used as the preferred catheterization method for clinicians. Citation:Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2022, 24(5): 591-595
Key words
Shock /
Central venous catheterization /
Ultrasound guidance /
Infant
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
1 中心静脉血管通路装置安全管理专家组. 中心静脉血管通路装置安全管理专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(4): 261-272. PMID: 32241055. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20191226-00638.
2 No authors listed. Practice guidelines for central venous access 2020: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on central venous access[J]. Anesthesiology, 2020, 132(1): 8-43. PMID: 31821240. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002864.
3 Brasher C, Malbezin S. Central venous catheters in small infants[J]. Anesthesiology, 2018, 128(1): 4-5. PMID: 29084011. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001961.
4 Soni NJ, Reyes LF, Keyt H, et al. Use of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization: a national survey of intensivists and hospitalists[J]. J Crit Care, 2016, 36: 277-283. PMID: 27491563. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.014.
5 Kamata M, Walia H, Hakim M, et al. An in vitro assessment of the efficacy of various IV cannulas for the rapid IV fluid administration[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2017, 18(5): e224-e228. PMID: 28319488. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001151.
6 张向阳, 陈旭岩. 《急性循环衰竭中国急诊临床实践专家共识》解读[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2016, 36(8): 668-670. DOI: 10.7504/nk2016070203.
7 Song IK, Kim EH, Lee JH, et al. Seldinger vs modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterisation in neonates: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018, 121(6): 1332-1337. PMID: 30442261. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.008.
8 陆国平. 儿童急诊与重症医学临床技术[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2016: 12-18.
9 韩运洋, 秦再生, 石能贤, 等. 超声引导下中心静脉穿刺中短轴法与长轴法的应用比较: 更新的系统评价与meta分析[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2020, 40(3): 308-315. PMID: 32376578. PMCID: PMC7167331. DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.03.17.
10 Bodenham Chair A, Babu S, Bennett J, et al. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: safe vascular access 2016[J]. Anaesthesia, 2016, 71(5): 573-585. PMID: 26888253. PMCID: PMC5067617. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13360.
11 崔利丹, 金志鹏, 王琪, 等. 床旁超声引导下中心静脉置管在危重患儿治疗中的应用[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2017, 34(3): 241-244. DOI: 10.7683/xxyxyxb.2017.03.023.
12 王小亭, 刘大为, 于凯江, 等. 中国重症超声专家共识[J]. 临床荟萃, 2017, 32(5): 369-383. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2017.05.001.
13 Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Executive summary: surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2020, 46(Suppl 1): 1-9. PMID: 32030528. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05877-7.
14 兰永怀, 程永涛, 郑冰, 等. 超声引导下深静脉置管在急诊中的应用效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2018, 3(3): 48-49. DOI: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.201803023.
15 Perbet S, Pereira B, Grimaldi F, et al. Guidance and examination by ultrasound versus landmark and radiographic method for placement of subclavian central venous catheters: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2014, 15: 175. PMID: 24885789. PMCID: PMC4031378. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-175.
16 Saugel B, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice[J]. Crit Care, 2017, 21(1): 225. PMID: 28844205. PMCID: PMC5572160. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1814-y.
17 Schindler E, Mikus M, Velten M. Central venous access in children: technique and complications[J]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther, 2021, 56(1): 60-68. PMID: 33412604. DOI: 10.1055/a-1187-5397.
18 Jamshidi R. Central venous catheters: indications, techniques, and complications[J]. Semin Pediatr Surg, 2019, 28(1): 26-32. PMID: 30824130. DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.01.005.
PDF(538 KB)
