Birth weights of singleton neonates of 14 Chinese ethnic groups in 11 cities of China

HUANG Xiao-Yun, ZHU Yuan-Fang, LIU Hui-Long, FU Mian-Ai, LIU Chuan-Yong, ZENG Ding-Yuan, HE Jun, SHI Qing-Xi, CHEN Chang-Shui, ZHU Bin, WANG Gao-Xiong, SHI Hao, LU Hao-Hua

Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11) : 1219-1225.

PDF(884 KB)
PDF(884 KB)
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11) : 1219-1225. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2206160
CLINICAL RESEARCH

Birth weights of singleton neonates of 14 Chinese ethnic groups in 11 cities of China

  • HUANG Xiao-Yun, ZHU Yuan-Fang, LIU Hui-Long, FU Mian-Ai, LIU Chuan-Yong, ZENG Ding-Yuan, HE Jun, SHI Qing-Xi, CHEN Chang-Shui, ZHU Bin, WANG Gao-Xiong, SHI Hao, LU Hao-Hua
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To develop the birth weight curves of the Chinese Han (26-41 weeks of gestation) and Zhuang (28-41 weeks of gestation) singleton neonates in 11 cities of China, as well as the birth weight means of full-term neonates of 14 Chinese ethnic groups. Methods The live singleton neonates who were born in 11 maternal and child health care hospitals from 11 cities of China between January 2017 and December 2020 were classified according to the mother's ethnic group. Birth weight means were calculated for the full-term neonates of each ethnic group. For the Han and Zhuang singleton neonates with a large sample size, the Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) method was used to establish the birth weight percentile curves of the Han and Zhuang singleton neonates with different gestational ages. Results A total of 105 365 live singleton neonates were included, among whom the Han neonates had the highest number of 84 851 (26-41 weeks of gestation), followed by the Zhuang neonates (12 803 neonates with a gestational age of 28-41 weeks). The neonates of the other Chinese ethnic groups enrolled were live full-term singleton neonates, with a sample size of more than 100 neonates for each ethnic group. The 3rd-97th percentile curves of birth weight were established for the Han singleton neonates with a gestational age of 26-41 weeks and the Zhuang singleton neonates with a gestational age of 28-41 weeks. The birth weight curves of the Han singleton neonates at each gestational age were higher than those of the Zhuang singleton neonates. Birth weight means (3 199-3 499 g) and standard deviations were determined for 14 Chinese ethnic groups, i.e., Li, Mulao, Zhuang, Yao, Dong, Miao, Han, Buyi, Mongolian, Tujia, Yi, Hui, Man, and Korean ethnic groups. The Li ethnic group had the lowest birth weight, followed by the Mulao, Zhuang, Yao, Dong, Miao, Han, Buyi, Mongolian, Tujia, Yi, Hui, Man, and Korean ethnic groups. Conclusions The 3rd-97th percentile curves of birth weight are developed for the Han (26-41 weeks of gestation) and Zhuang (28-41 weeks of gestation) singleton neonates in 11 cities of China, and birth weight means are determined for the full-term neonates of 14 Chinese ethnic groups in 11 cities of China, which provides a reference for evaluating the intrauterine growth of neonates in these ethnic groups.

Key words

Intrauterine growth / Singleton / Birth weight / Ethnic group / Neonate

Cite this article

Download Citations
HUANG Xiao-Yun, ZHU Yuan-Fang, LIU Hui-Long, FU Mian-Ai, LIU Chuan-Yong, ZENG Ding-Yuan, HE Jun, SHI Qing-Xi, CHEN Chang-Shui, ZHU Bin, WANG Gao-Xiong, SHI Hao, LU Hao-Hua. Birth weights of singleton neonates of 14 Chinese ethnic groups in 11 cities of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2022, 24(11): 1219-1225 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2206160

References

1 Kandraju H, Agrawal S, Geetha K, et al. Gestational age-specific centile charts for anthropometry at birth for South Indian infants[J]. Indian Pediatr, 2012, 49(3): 199-202. PMID: 21992862. DOI: 10.1007/s13312-012-0060-2.
2 Morisaki N, Kawachi I, Oken E, et al. Social and anthropometric factors explaining racial/ethnical differences in birth weight in the United States[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 46657. PMID: 28429791. PMCID: PMC5399358. DOI: 10.1038/srep46657.
3 王丽珍, 曹静, 刘国英, 等. 乌鲁木齐市5 027例新生儿体格发育调查[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2018, 20(12): 994-1001. PMID: 30572987. PMCID: PMC7389501. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.12.004.
4 黄小云, 刘惠龙, 雷敏, 等. 深圳16 887例胎龄27~42周新生儿宫内生长体重、身长、头围、胸围、顶臀长曲线[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2017, 19(8): 877-886. PMID: 28774362. PMCID: PMC7390042. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.08.007.
5 黄小云, 刘惠龙, 雷敏, 等. 新生儿出生后体格生长指标现场测量值与籍贯差异的研究[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2018, 19(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.16506/j.1009-6639.2018.01.007.
6 黄小云, 朱元方, 刘惠龙, 等. 中国11市93 720例胎龄24~42周单胎儿出生体重曲线及其地区差异特征[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2022, 24(5): 482-491. PMID: 35644187. PMCID: PMC9154362. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2112032.
7 黄小云, 朱元方, 刘惠龙, 等. 中国11市17 256例胎龄25~40周双胎儿出生体重曲线及地区差异特征[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2022, 24(8): 899-907. PMID: 36036129. PMCID: PMC9425864. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2204026.
8 Doom EC, Delbaere I, Martens G, et al. Birth weight for gestational age among Flemish twin population[J]. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2012, 4(1): 42-49. PMID: 24753888. PMCID: PMC3991447.
9 黄小云, 刘惠龙, 雷敏, 等. 胎龄27~40周双胎新生儿宫内生长状况研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2018, 20(4): 267-273. PMID: 29658449. PMCID: PMC7390032. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.04.003.
10 黄小云, 刘惠龙, 雷敏, 等. 初产足月儿与经产足月儿宫内生长水平差异的研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2018, 20(3): 184-188. PMID: 29530116. PMCID: PMC7389783. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.03.004.
11 Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood[J]. Stat Med, 1992, 11(10): 1305-1319. PMID: 1518992. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780111005.
12 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 国务院关于调整城市规模划分标准的通知: 国发〔2014〕51号[EB/OL]. (2014-11-20)[2022-03-22]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-11/20/content_9225.htm.
13 陈继昌, 林墨菊, 邱萍, 等. 广西不同民族新生儿出生情况及出生缺陷分析[J]. 中国保健营养, 2013(下): 5378-5379.
14 国家统计局. 2021中国统计年鉴: 2-22 分民族、性别的人口数[EB/OL]. [2022-03-22]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2021/indexch.htm.
PDF(884 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/