A cross-sectional survey of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in 24 hospitals in Shenzhen City

Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network

Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 250-257.

PDF(596 KB)
PDF(596 KB)
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 250-257. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2308017
CLINICAL RESEARCH

A cross-sectional survey of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in 24 hospitals in Shenzhen City

  • Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the current status of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in Shenzhen City. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in November 2022, involving 24 tertiary hospitals participating in the Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network. The survey assessed the implementation of transitional care management in the delivery room, including prenatal preparation, delivery room resuscitation, and post-resuscitation management in the neonatal intensive care unit. Very/extremely preterm infants were divided into four groups based on gestational age: <26 weeks, 26-28+6 weeks, 29-30+6 weeks, and 31-31+6 weeks. Descriptive analysis was performed on the results. Results A total of 140 very/extremely preterm infants were included, with 10 cases in the <26 weeks group, 45 cases in the 26-28+6 weeks group, 49 cases in the 29-30+6 weeks group, and 36 cases in the 31-31+6 weeks group. Among these infants, 99 (70.7%) received prenatal counseling, predominantly provided by obstetricians (79.8%). The main personnel involved in resuscitation during delivery were midwives (96.4%) and neonatal resident physicians (62.1%). Delayed cord clamping was performed in 52 cases (37.1%), with an average delay time of (45±17) seconds. Postnatal radiant warmer was used in 137 cases (97.9%) for thermoregulation. Positive pressure ventilation was required in 110 cases (78.6%), with 67 cases (60.9%) using T-piece resuscitators and 42 cases (38.2%) using a blended oxygen device. Blood oxygen saturation was monitored during resuscitation in 119 cases (85.0%). The median time from initiating transitional care measures to closing the incubator door was 87 minutes. Conclusions The implementation of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in the hospitals participating in the Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network shows varying degrees of deviation from the corresponding expert consensus in China. It is necessary to bridge the gap through continuous quality improvement and multicenter collaboration to improve the quality of the transitional care management and outcomes in very/extremely preterm infants.

Key words

Transitional care management / Cross-sectional survey / Shenzhen / Very preterm infant / Extremely preterm infant

Cite this article

Download Citations
Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network. A cross-sectional survey of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in 24 hospitals in Shenzhen City[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2024, 26(3): 250-257 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2308017

References

1 Wyckoff MH, Wyllie J, Aziz K, et al. Neonatal life support 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations[J]. Resuscitation, 2020, 156: A156-A187. PMID: 33098917. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.015.
2 Li SJ, Feng Q, Tian XY, et al. Delivery room resuscitation and short-term outcomes of extremely preterm and extremely low birth weight infants: a multicenter survey in North China[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(13): 1561-1568. PMID: 34133350. PMCID: PMC8280058. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001499.
3 中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会, 中国医院协会妇产医院管理分会围产医学学组, 中国妇幼保健协会新生儿保健专业委员会. 极早产儿产房过渡期管理专家共识[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2022, 25(6): 401-411. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20220108-00027.
4 江苏省新生儿复苏临床研究协作组. 江苏省28家医院胎龄<32周早产儿早期稳定管理状况调查[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志(中英文), 2023, 38(1): 12-17. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2023.01.004.
5 Isayama T. The clinical management and outcomes of extremely preterm infants in Japan: past, present, and future[J]. Transl Pediatr, 2019, 8(3): 199-211. PMID: 31413954. PMCID: PMC6675688. DOI: 10.21037/tp.2019.07.10.
6 Kleinhout MY, Stevens MM, Osman KA, et al. Evidence-based interventions to reduce mortality among preterm and low-birthweight neonates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ Glob Health, 2021, 6(2): e003618. PMID: 33602687. PMCID: PMC7896575. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003618.
7 Cao Y, Jiang S, Sun J, et al. Assessment of neonatal intensive care unit practices, morbidity, and mortality among very preterm infants in China[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(8): e2118904. PMID: 34338792. PMCID: PMC8329742. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18904.
8 Shah V, Hodgson K, Seshia M, et al. Golden hour management practices for infants <32 weeks gestational age in Canada[J]. Paediatr Child Health, 2018, 23(4): e70-e76. PMID: 30038535. PMCID: PMC6007305. DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx175.
9 Schuler R, Bedei I, Oehmke F, et al. Neonatal outcome and treatment perspectives of preterm infants at the border of viability[J]. Children (Basel), 2022, 9(3): 313. PMID: 35327684. PMCID: PMC8946876. DOI: 10.3390/children9030313.
10 Fish R, Weber A, Crowley M, et al. Early antenatal counseling in the outpatient setting for high-risk pregnancies: a randomized control trial[J]. J Perinatol, 2021, 41(7): 1595-1604. PMID: 33510421. PMCID: PMC10718404. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-00933-x.
11 Gaucher N, Nadeau S, Barbier A, et al. Antenatal consultations for preterm labour: how are future mothers reassured?[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2018, 103(1): F36-F42. PMID: 28588124. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312448.
12 吴艳, 钟晓云, 周利刚, 等. “早产儿过渡期干预措施”改进对超早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2022, 25(4): 263-270. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20210906-00770.
13 Pozzi N, Cocca F, Pannella G, et al. Obstetric education and neonatal resuscitation at birth: an Italian survey[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(21): 4060-4064. PMID: 33203285. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1846701.
14 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组, 中华儿科杂志编辑委员会. 出生胎龄<32周早产儿复苏临床实践指南(2022)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2023, 61(1): 6-15. PMID: 36594115. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20221027-00912.
15 董小玥, 孙小凡, 李萌萌, 等. 延迟脐带结扎对胎龄<32周早产儿的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2016, 18(7): 635-638. PMID: 27412548. PMCID: PMC7388993. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2016.07.013.
16 Leslie MS, Greene J, Schulkin J, et al. Umbilical cord clamping practices of U.S. obstetricians[J]. J Neonatal Perinatal Med, 2018, 11(1): 51-60. PMID: 29689745. DOI: 10.3233/NPM-181729.
17 Rabe H, Gyte GM, Díaz-Rossello JL, et al. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 9(9): CD003248. PMID: 31529790. PMCID: PMC6748404. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub4.
18 Surak A, Elsayed Y. Delayed cord clamping: time for physiologic implementation[J]. J Neonatal Perinatal Med, 2022, 15(1): 19-27. PMID: 34219673. DOI: 10.3233/NPM-210745.
19 钱苗, 余章斌, 陈小慧, 等. 不同强度复苏的出生体重<1 500 g早产儿临床特征分析: 多中心回顾性调查[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2021, 23(6): 593-598. PMID: 34130781. PMCID: PMC8214002. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101142.
20 Wang SL, Chen C, Gu XY, et al. Delivery room resuscitation intensity and associated neonatal outcomes of 24+0-31+6 weeks' preterm infants in China: a retrospective cross-sectional study[J]. World J Pediatr, 2023. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37389785. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-023-00738-2.
21 Singh Y, Oddie S. Marked variation in delivery room management in very preterm infants[J]. Resuscitation, 2013, 84(11): 1558-1561. PMID: 23948446. PMCID: PMC3828483. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.06.026.
22 Izquierdo M, Iriondo M, Ruiz C, et al. Survey of neonatal resuscitation practices showed post-training improvements but need to reinforce preterm management, monitoring and adrenaline use[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2017, 106(6): 897-903. PMID: 28218962. DOI: 10.1111/apa.13791.
23 Hodgson KA, Owen LS, Lui K, et al. Neonatal golden hour: a survey of Australian and New Zealand neonatal network units' early stabilisation practices for very preterm infants[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2021, 57(7): 990-997. PMID: 33543835. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.15360.
24 Harriman TL, Carter B, Dail RB, et al. Golden hour protocol for preterm infants: a quality improvement project[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2018, 18(6): 462-470. PMID: 30212389. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000554.
PDF(596 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/