Comparisons of efficacy of different pulmonary surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

LIU Yun, LI Li, LIANG Wen-Ying, NIE Chun-Xia

Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 253-255.

PDF(898 KB)
PDF(898 KB)
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 253-255.
CLINICAL RESEARCH

Comparisons of efficacy of different pulmonary surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

  • LIU Yun, LI Li, LIANG Wen-Ying, NIE Chun-Xia
Author information +
History +

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of imported pulmonary surfactant (PS) pig lung phospholipids injection (pig PS) and domestic cattle lung surface-active agent (cattle PS) for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). METHODS: A total of 180 cases of grade IV NRDS receiving pig PS (n=90) or cattle PS treatment (n=90) were enrolled. The blood gas analysis and chest X-ray results and the incidence of complications after treatment, and hospitalization time and cost were compared between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The efficiency rate in the pig PS group (97%) was higher than in the catle PS group (83%) (P<0.01). The cure rate in the pig PS group was also higher than in the cattle PS group (84% vs 66%; P<0.01). The incidence of pneumothorax in the pig PS group was lower than in the cattle PS group (3% vs 7%; P<0.05). The hospitalization time in the pig PS group was shorter than in the cattle PS group (21±4 days vs 23±4 days; P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the total hospitalization cost between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pig PS seems to be superior to cattle PS in the treatment of grade IV NRDS.

Key words

Respiratory distress syndrome / Pulmonary surfactant / Neonate

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Yun, LI Li, LIANG Wen-Ying, NIE Chun-Xia. Comparisons of efficacy of different pulmonary surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2012, 14(4): 253-255

References

[1]史学凯,吴时光,罗晓鸿,蓝国锋,柳国胜.鼻塞持续呼吸道正压通气与机械通气治疗Ⅳ级新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2010,25(2):123-124.

[2]陈就好,李薇.肺表面活性物质固尔苏对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征呼吸功能的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志,2004,6(5):422-424.

[3]刘明月,张琪,王菲,李颖,陈静,高丽华.国产肺表面活性物质联合序贯通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2009,24(6):464-466.

[4]陈超.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征[M]//邵肖梅,叶红瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿科学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:395398.

[5]余志凌,薛辛东.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿肺功能的动态变化[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(1):81-84.

[6]Ghaemi S, Mohamadymasodi M, Kelishadi R. Evaluation of the effects of surfactant replacement therapy in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2009, 11 (3): 188-190.

[7]Dudell GG, Stoll BJ. Respiratory distress syndrome (hyaline membrane disease) [M]//Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB,Stanton BF. Nelson Text Book of Pediatrics.18th ed. Phildelphia: Saunders Com, 2007: 731-740.

[8]吴俊.急性呼吸窘迫综合征[M]//吴本清.新生儿危重症监护诊疗与护理.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:104-106.
PDF(898 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/