PDF(1392 KB)
Clinical efficacy of nasal high-frequency ventilation in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a Meta analysis
YANG Yu-Lan, WU Ben-Qing, SU Jin-Zhen, YANG Lin, ZHONG GUI-Chao, LIU Lan
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (11) : 897-903.
PDF(1392 KB)
PDF(1392 KB)
Clinical efficacy of nasal high-frequency ventilation in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a Meta analysis
Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of nasal high-frequency ventilation (nHFV) in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBase (Ovid), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang Data, and Weipu Data to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy of nHFV and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in the treatment of NRDS. A Meta analysis was performed on the included RCTs using Rev Man 5.3 software after data extraction and quality evaluation by Cochrane 5.1.0. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 218 patients were included. The Meta analysis showed that compared with the nCPAP group, the nHFV group had a significantly better treatment outcome (RR=1.73, 95% CI:1.39-2.15, P < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, pneumothorax and retinopathy of prematurity. Conclusions Compared with nCPAP, nHFV has better clinical efficacy in the treatment of NRDS, without increasing the risk of related complications.
Nasal high-frequency ventilation / Noninvasive high-frequency ventilation / Respiratory distress syndrome / Meta analysis / Neonate
[1] 邵肖梅, 叶鸿瑁, 丘小汕. 实用新生儿学[M]. 第4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2015:395-398.
[2] Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O'Donnell CP, et al. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016(2):CD006405.
[3] Cools F, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015(3):CD000104.
[4] Wang J, Liu X, Zhu T, et al. Analysis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome among different gestational segments[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(9):16273-16279.
[5] Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome-2016 Update[J]. Neonatology, 2017, 111(2):107-125.
[6] 朱兴旺, 闫军, 冉琴, 等. 无创高频振荡通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的初步研究[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志, 2017, 32(4):291-294.
[7] Mukerji A, Sarmiento K, Lee B, et al. Non-invasive highfrequency ventilation versus bi-phasic continuous positive airway pressure (BP-CPAP) following CPAP failure in infants <1250 g:a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. J Perinatol, 2017, 37(1):49-53.
[8] Zhu XW, Zhao JN, Tang SF, et al. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome:a preliminary report[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2017, 52(8):1038-1042.
[9] 娄五斌, 张卫星. 经鼻无创高频振荡通气和持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征撤机后的应用比较[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(13):2037-2040.
[10] 张冰, 张卫星, 常绍鸿, 等. 鼻塞式高频振荡通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2017, 34(6):519-522.
[11] Oremus M, Wolfson C, Perrault A, et al. Interrater reliability of the modified Jadad quality scale for systematic reviews of Alzheimer's disease drug trials[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2001, 12(3):232-236.
[12] 袁菲菲, 赵行琪, 秦桂秀. 枸橼酸咖啡因与氨茶碱治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的Meta分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(20):3053-3065.
[13] Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions:explanation and elaboration[J]. BMJ, 2009, 339:b2700.
[14] 王家良, 康德英, 许能锋, 等. 循证医学[M]. 第3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2016:71-90.
[15] 蒋璐灿, 全淑燕, 李佳莲, 等. 西地那非治疗新生儿持续性肺动脉高压的系统评价[J]. 中国药房, 2017, 28(9):1211-1215.
[16] 张涛, 高薇薇, 陈佳, 等. 无创高频通气在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征撤机后的应用[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志, 2017, 32(2):96-99.
[17] Klotz D, Schneider H, Schumann S, et al. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants:a randomised controlled cross-over trial[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2018, 103(4):F1-F5.
[18] Mukerji A, Finelli M, Belik J. Nasal high-frequency oscillation for lung carbon dioxide clearance in the newborn[J]. Neonatology, 2013, 103(3):161-165.
[19] De Luca D, Carnielli VP, Conti G, et al. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs:bench evaluation of efficacy and mechanics[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010, 36(12):2094-2100.
[20] Aktas S, Unal S, Aksu M, et al. Nasal HFOV with binasal cannula appears effective and feasible in ELBW newborns[J]. J Trop Pediatr, 2016, 62(2):165-168.
[21] 刘兆娥, 余加林. 新生儿机械通气时撤机失败的临床因素[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2006, 21(1):69-70.
[22] Costa AC, Schettino Rde C, Ferreira SC. Predictors of extubation failure and reintubation in newborn infants subjected to mechanical ventilation[J]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2014, 26(1):51-56.
