Objective This study examines the impacts of an improved electrode placement on the electrocardiogram (ECG) results in order to determine a better electrode placement for ECG monitoring in children.Methods ECG was recorded using the traditional electrode placement and the modified electrode placement (with shortened electrode distance) respectively in 50 pediatric patients. The amplitudes of P wave and QRS wave on ECG by the two measurements were compared. Furthermore, the impacts of different body positions on the amplitudes of P wave and QRS wave were studied after applying the modified electrode placement.Results There were no significant differences in the amplitudes of P wave and QRS wave on ECG by the traditional electrode placement and the modified electrode placement (P>0.05). When modified electrode placement was utilized, the body position change did not lead to significant changes in the amplitudes of P wave and QRS wave (P>0.05).Conclusions A satisfactory ECG can be obtained with the modified electrode placement independent of patient's body position, suggesting that the modified electrode placement can be used instead of the traditional placement in children.
Key words
Electrocardiogram /
Electrode placement /
P wave /
QRS wave /
Child
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Nedios S, Romero I, Gerds-Li JH, et al. Precordial electrode placement for optimal ECG monitoring:implications for ambulatory monitor devices and event recorders[J]. J Electrocardiol, 2014, 47(5):669-676.
[2] 宋米英, 刘环, 谢凝华. 标准I 导联电极位置改变创新连接 临床应用探讨[J]. 实用心电学杂志, 2010, 19(6):421-422.
[3] Welinder A, Wagner GS, Maynard C, et al. Differences in QRS axis measurements, classification of inferior myocardial infarction, and noise tolerance for 12-lead electrocardiograms acquired from monitoring electrode positions compared to standard locations[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2010, 106(4):581-586.
[4] Tragardh-Johansson E, Welinder A, Pahlm O, et al. Similarity of ST and T waveforms of 12-lead electrocardiogram acquired from different monitoring electrode positions[J]. J Electrocardiol, 2011, 44(2):109-114.
[5] Madias JE. Comparability of the standing and supine standard electrocardiograms and standing sitting and supine stress electrocardiograms[J]. J Electrocardiol, 2006, 39(2):142-149.