家庭亲密度和适应性对学龄前儿童行为问题的影响

doi:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2016.05.009

Abstract
Figure/Table
References(20)
Related Citation (13)
Read Tracking
Download Tracking

Download: PDF (1259 KB) HTML()
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of family cohesion and adaptability on behavioral problems in preschool children. Methods The stratified cluster multistage sampling method was used to perform a questionnaire survey in the parents of 1 284 children aged 3-6 years in the urban area of Lanzhou, China. The general status questionnaire, Conners Child Behavior Checklist (Parent Symptom Question), and Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale, Second edition, Chinese version (FACESII-CV) were used to investigate behavioral problems and family cohesion and adaptability. Results The overall detection rate of behavioral problems in preschool children was 17.13%. The children with different types of family cohesion had different detection rates of behavioral problems, and those with free-type family cohesion showed the highest detection rate of behavioral problems (40.2%). The children with different types of family adaptability also had different detection rates of behavioral problems, and those with stiffness type showed the highest detection rate of behavioral problems (25.1%). The behavioral problems in preschool children were negatively correlated with family cohesion and adaptability. Conclusions During the growth of preschool children, family cohesion and adaptability have certain effects on the mental development of preschool children.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Yan-Ni
	XUE Hong-Li
	CHEN Qian

Key words： Cohesion Adaptability Behavioral problem Preschool child

Received: 01 January 2016

Cite this article:

WANG Yan-Ni,XUE Hong-Li,CHEN Qian. Effects of family cohesion and adaptability on behavioral problems in preschool children[J]. CJCP, 2016, 18(5): 421-425.

URL:

http://www.zgddek.com/EN/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2016.05.009 OR http://www.zgddek.com/EN/Y2016/V18/I5/421

[1]	滕春燕. 4~7 岁幼儿行为问题与父母心理健康的相关研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报( 自然科学版), 2011, 36(3): 74-78.
[2]	胡敏, 静进, 金宇, 等. 广州市黄埔区学龄前儿童行为问题及影响因素的横断面调查[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2012, 7(1): 11-18.
[3]	周科盈. 学龄前儿童行为问题及其相关影响因素分析[J]. 中国初级卫生保健, 2012, 26(1): 58-59.
[4]	何守森, 关春荣, 吴茂萍, 等. 学龄前儿童行为问题有关影响因素的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(11): 992-995.
[5]	叶春红, 顾莉萍, 李璟, 等. 中山市学龄前儿童行为问题与家庭环境关系的调查研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2013, 21(4): 394-396.
[6]	Mackenbach JD, Ringoot AP, van der Ende J, et al. Exploring the relation of harsh parental discipline with child emotional and behavioral problems by using multiple informants. The generation R study[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e104793.
[7]	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册( 增订版)[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 124-127.
[8]	Lars W, Turid Suzanne BN, Adrian A, et al. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in preschoolers[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2012, 53(6): 695-705.
[9]	涂琳, 孟群, 黄肇华, 等. 家庭环境与儿童行为问题关系的研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2013, 20(19): 162-163.
[10]	魏煌忠, 刘华, 曾玉云, 等. 学龄前儿童行为问题与家庭因素的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2007, 22(28): 3956-3958.
[11]	郭茹, 毛定安, 李介民, 等. 3~5岁儿童行为问题调查及中美Conners 常模的比较[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2011, 13(11): 901-903.
[12]	杨胜文, 林先燕, 余跃生, 等. 少数民族地区3~6 岁儿童行为问题及其影响因素[J]. 现代预防医学, 2007, 34(23): 4422-4424.
[13]	Drake KL, Ginsburg GS. Family factors in the development, treatment, and prevention of childhood anxiety disorders[J]. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev, 2012, 15(2): 144-162.
[14]	关明杰, 高磊, 翟淑娜. 家庭环境及父母教养方式对儿童行为问题的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2010, 31 (12): 1470-1472.
[15]	Peleg-Popko O, Dar R. Marital quality, family patterns, and children's fears and social anxiety[J]. Contemp Fam Ther, 2001, 23(4): 465-487.
[16]	贾守梅. 学龄前儿童攻击性行为的家庭系统研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2013.
[17]	苏朝霞, 王学义, 吴书慧, 等. 儿童行为问题及其相关影响因素研究[J]. 临床荟萃, 2011, 26(6): 546-549.
[18]	杜霞, 李玉玲, 张玉柱, 等. 学龄双生子儿童心理行为问题及其影响因素[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(12): 1286-1291.
[19]	Barber BK, Buehler C. Family cohesion and enmeshment: different constructs, different effects[J]. J Marriage Family, 1996, 58(2): 433-441.
[20]	Ben-David A, Jurich J. A test of adaptability: examining the curvilinear assumption[J]. J Fam Psychol, 1993, 7: 370-375.