Abstract Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) can augment nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) by delivering intermittent positive pressure ventilation in a noninvasive way and can provide a new option for neonatal noninvasive respiratory support. NIPPV has an advantage over nCPAP in primary and post-extubation respiratory support. Moreover, it can reduce severe apnea of prematurity. Synchronized NIPPV has promising application prospects. This review article summarizes the advances in the application of NIPPV in neonatal respiratory support to promote the understanding and standardization of this technique.
Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, et al. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure[J]. N Engl J Med, 1971, 284(24):1333.
[2]
Waitz M, Mense L, Kirpalani H, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates:synchronized or not?[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2016, 43(4):799-816.
Huang L, Mendler MR, Waitz M, et al. Effects of synchronization during noninvasive intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome immediately after extubation[J]. Neonatology, 2015, 108(2):108-114.
Nzegwu NI, Mack T, Dellaventura R, et al. Systematic use of the RAM nasal cannula in the Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit:a quality improvement project[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 28(6):718-721.
[9]
Mukerji A, Belik J. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation efficacy and lung pressure transmission[J]. J Perinatol, 2015, 35(9):716-719.
[10]
Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Effects of synchronisation during SiPAP-generated nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preterm infants[J]. Archs Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2015, 100(1):F24-30.
[11]
Moretti C, Gizzi C, Montecchia F, et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation of the newborn:Technical issues and clinical results[J]. Neonatology, 2016, 109(4):359-365.
[12]
Lee J, Kim HS, Jung YH, et al. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants:a randomised phase Ⅱ crossover trial[J]. Arc Dis ChildFetal Neonatal Ed, 2015, 100(6):507-513.
[13]
Firestone KS, Beck J, Stein H. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist for noninvasive support in neonates[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2016, 43(4):707-724.
[14]
Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation:a survey of practice in England[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2008, 93(2):F148-150.
[15]
Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, et al. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 12:CD005384.
[16]
Duman N, Tüzün F, Sever AH, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation with or without very early surfactant therapy for the primary treatment of respiratory distress syndrome[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2016, 29(2):252-257.
[17]
Long C, Li W, Wanwei L, et al. Noninvasive ventilation with heliox for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infant:A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Can Respir J, 2016, 2016(3):9092871.
[18]
Biniwale M, Wertheimer F. Decrease in delivery room intubation rates after use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room for resuscitation of very low birth weight infants[J]. Resuscitation, 2017, 116:33-38.
[19]
Ryan CA, Finer NN, Peters KL. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity[J]. Am J Dis Child, 1989, 143(10):1196-1198.
[20]
Lin CH, Wang ST, Lin YJ, et al. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 1998, 26(5):349-353.
[21]
Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002, 1(1):CD002272.
[22]
Gizzi C, Montecchia F, Panetta V, et al. Is synchronised NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and NCPAP in treating apnoea of prematurity (AOP)? A randomised cross-over trial[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2015, 100(1):F17-23.
[23]
Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 2:CD003212.
[24]
Demirel G, Uras N, Celik IH, et al. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for transient tachypnea of newborn:a randomized, prospective study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013, 26(11):1099-1102.
[25]
Jasani B, Nanavati R, Kabra N, et al. Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome:a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2016, 29(10):1546-1551.
[26]
Esmaeilnia T, Nayeri F, Taheritafti R, et al. Comparison of complications and efficacy of NIPPV and nasal CPAP in preterm infants with RDS[J]. Iran J Pediatr, 2016, 26(2):e2352.
[27]
Tang S, Zhao J, Shen J, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates:asystematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Indian Pediatr, 2013, 50(4):371-376.
[28]
Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Pediatrics, 2011, 127(2):300-307.
[29]
Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, et al. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(7):611-620.
[30]
Isayama T, Iwami H, Mcdonald S, et al. Association of noninvasive ventilation strategies with mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia among preterm infants:A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2016, 316(6):611-624.
[31]
Li W, Long C, Zhangxue H, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome:A meta-analysis and update[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2015, 50(4):402-409.
Oncel MY, Arayici S, Uras N, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants:a randomised controlled trial[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(4):F323-328.
[34]
Millar D, Lemyre B, Kirpalani H, et al. A comparison of bilevel and ventilator-delivered non-invasive respiratory support[J]. Archs Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(1):F21-25.
[35]
Pape KE, Armstrong DL, Fitzhardinge PM. Central nervous system patholgoy associated with mask ventilation in the very low birthweight infant:a new etiology for intracerebellar hemorrhages[J]. Pediatrics, 1976, 58(4):473-483.
[36]
Garland JS, Nelson DB, Rice T, et al. Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs[J]. Pediatrics, 1985, 76(3):406-410.
[37]
Sadeghnia A, Foroshani MZ, Badiei Z. A comparative study of the effect of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure on the regional brain tissue oximetry in premature newborns weighing <1500 g[J]. Int J Prev Med, 2017, 8:41.
[38]
Chang HY, Cheng KS, Lung HL, et al. Hemodynamic effects of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(6):e2780.
