Follow-up observation of catch-up growth of preterm infants after discharge and risk factors for extrauterine growth retardation

GAO Xiao-Yan, FENG Lin, XU Jing, PAN Xin-Nian

Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6) : 438-443.

PDF(1158 KB)
PDF(1158 KB)
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6) : 438-443. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.06.002
CLINICAL RESEARCH

Follow-up observation of catch-up growth of preterm infants after discharge and risk factors for extrauterine growth retardation

  • GAO Xiao-Yan, FENG Lin, XU Jing, PAN Xin-Nian
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the catch-up growth of preterm infants within a corrected age of 6 months and the risk factors for extrauterine growth retardation (EUGR). Methods A total of 321 preterm infants who were discharged after treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit and had regular follow-up documents with complete follow-up records were enrolled. According to the Prenatal Health Care Norms in 2015, these infants were divided into low-risk group with 69 infants and high-risk group with 252 infants. The Z-score method was used to evaluate body weight, body length, and head circumference, and the catch-up growth of the preterm infants within a corrected age of 6 months was analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for EUGR at the corrected age of 6 months. Results The percentage of preterm infants with Z scores of body weight, body length, and head circumference of < -2 (not reach the standard for catch-up growth) in both groups decreased gradually with increasing corrected age. At the corrected age of 6 months, the percentages of preterm infants whose body weight, body length, and head circumference did not reach the standard for catch-up growth in the low-risk group were reduced to 1.4% (1/69), 2.9% (2/69), and 1.4% (1/69) respectively, while in the high-risk group, these percentages were reduced to 1.2% (3/252), 1.6% (4/252), and 3.6% (9/252) respectively. The high-risk group had a significantly higher incidence rate of EUGR at the corrected age of 6 months than the low-risk group (28.2% vs 15.9%, P=0.039). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that multiple birth (OR=2.68, P=0.010), low birth weight (<1 000 g: OR=14.84, P < 0.001; 1 000-1 499 g: OR=2.85, P=0.005), and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) (OR=11.41, P < 0.001) were risk factors for EUGR at the corrected age of 6 months, while nutritional enhancement after birth (OR=0.25, P < 0.001) reduced the risk of EUGR. Conclusions Most preterm infants can achieve catch-up growth at the corrected age of 6 months. High-risk preterm infants have a high incidence rate of EUGR at the corrected age of 6 months. Multiple birth, low birth weight, and IUGR are risk factors for EUGR, while rational nutritional enhancement after birth can reduce the incidence rate of EUGR in preterm infants.

Key words

Catch-up growth / Z score / Extrauterine growth retardation / Risk factor / Preterm infant

Cite this article

Download Citations
GAO Xiao-Yan, FENG Lin, XU Jing, PAN Xin-Nian. Follow-up observation of catch-up growth of preterm infants after discharge and risk factors for extrauterine growth retardation[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2018, 20(6): 438-443 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.06.002

References

[1] Cooke RJ, Ainsworth SB, Fenton AC. Postnatal growth retardation:a universal problem in preterm infants[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2004, 89(5):F428-F430.
[2] 王学敏, 朱艳萍, 王莉. 积极营养支持策略对早产儿宫外发育迟缓的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2013, 15(12):1054-1058.
[3] 张勇, 王朝晖. 早产儿体格发育迟缓及相关因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016, 24(7):746-748.
[4] Embleton NE, Pang N, Cooke RJ. Postnatal malnutrition and growth retardation:an inevitable consequence of current recommendations in preterm infants?[J]. Pediatrics, 2001, 107(2):270-273.
[5] Cooke RJ. Postnatal growth and development in the preterm and small for gestational age infant[J]. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program, 2010, 65:85-95.
[6] 欧阳小琳, 林希平. 极低出生体重儿的婴幼儿时期生长发育情况调查[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2000, 38(5):296-298.
[7] Giuliani F, Cheikh Ismail L, Bertino E, et al. Monitoring postnatal growth of preterm infants:present and future[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2016, 103(2):635S-647S.
[8] 国家卫生计生委办公厅[(2017) 9号]. 早产儿保健工作规范(讨论稿)[S].
[9] Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2013, 20(13):59-65.
[10] de Onis M, Onyango A, Borghi E, et al. Worldwide implementation of the WHO Child Growth Standards[J]. Public Health Nutr, 2012, 15(9):1603-1610.
[11] 王新利, 葛美茹, 武文燕, 等. 1~24月婴幼儿胰岛素样生长因子-1水平及与生长发育的关系[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2010, 12(6):459-461.
[12] 王新利, 康新, 关于红, 等.胰岛素样生长因子-1与健康婴儿生长速度及喂养关系分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(4):354-357.
[13] Boguszewski MC, Mericq V, Bergada I, et al. Latin American consensus:children born small for gestational age[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2011, 11:66.
[14] 王雪茵, 周敏, 张小松, 等. 374例早产儿追赶生长的纵向随访研究[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2017, 28(12):1497-1500.
[15] 童梅玲, 张敏, 池霞, 等. 84例早产适于胎龄儿第一年体格追赶生长纵向评估[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2011, 13(1):12-15.
[16] Clark RH, Thomas P, Peabody J. Extrauterine growth restriction remains a serious problem in prematurely born neonates[J]. Pediatrics, 2003, 111(5 Pt 1):986-990.
[17] 曹玮, 张永红, 赵冬莹, 等. 34周以下早产儿宫外生长发育迟缓发生的影响因素[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(5):453-458.
[18] Loÿs CM, Maucort-Boulch D, Guy B, et al. Extremely low birthweight infants:how neonatal intensive care unit teams can reduce postnatal malnutrition and prevent growth retardation[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2013, 102(3):242-248.

PDF(1158 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/