中国三城市25 254例不同出生胎龄儿童神经行为发育水平研究

刘明霞, 戴霄天, 花静

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (9) : 931-935.

PDF(1150 KB)
HTML
PDF(1150 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (9) : 931-935. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2003338
论著·临床研究

中国三城市25 254例不同出生胎龄儿童神经行为发育水平研究

  • 刘明霞, 戴霄天, 花静
作者信息 +

Neurobehavioral development of 25 254 children with different gestational ages at birth in three cities of China

  • LIU Ming-Xia, DAI Xiao-Tian, HUA Jing
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨出生胎龄对学龄前儿童神经行为发育水平的影响。方法 来自安徽马鞍山市、浙江台州市、江苏扬州市的25 254例学龄前儿童纳入研究。根据所纳入儿童的出生胎龄,分为早产儿组(2 760例,胎龄28~36+6周)、早期儿组(6 005例,胎龄37~38+6周)、完全足月儿组(16 489例,胎龄≥39周)。采用年龄与发育进程问卷对儿童进行神经行为发育水平的评估。结果 早产儿组的沟通、粗大运动、精细运动、解决问题和个人-社会等5个能区的神经行为得分较完全足月儿组低(均P < 0.05);早产儿组沟通、粗大运动、精细运动、解决问题4个能区神经行为得分较早期儿组低(均P < 0.05);早期儿组各能区的平均分值与完全足月儿组相比,差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,校正了性别、年龄、体重指数、父母亲教育程度等混杂因素后,胎龄与5个发育能区(沟通、粗大运动、精细运动、解决问题和个人-社会)的得分呈显著正相关(P < 0.01)。结论 出生为早产儿的儿童神经行为发育水平较出生为完全足月儿和早期儿的儿童低,而出生为早期儿的儿童神经行为发育水平与出生为完全足月儿的儿童无明显差异。胎龄是神经行为发育水平的独立影响因素。

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of gestational age at birth on the neurobehavioral development of preschool children. Methods A total of 25 254 preschool children from Ma'anshan of Anhui Province, Taizhou of Zhejiang Province, and Yangzhou of Jiangsu Province were enrolled. The preschool children were divided into three groups based on their gestational ages at birth:preterm group (2 760 cases; 28-36+6 weeks), early term group (6 005 cases; 37-38+6 weeks), and full term group (16 489 cases; ≥ 39 weeks). The Ages and Stages Questionnaires-Third Edition (ASQ-3) was employed to evaluate the children's neurobehavioral development. Results The preterm group had significantly lower scores of the five domains of ASQ-3, communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, and personal-social, than the full term group (P < 0.05), and significantly lower scores of communication, gross motor, fine motor, and problem solving than the early term group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the scores of the five domains of ASQ-3 between the early term and full term groups (P > 0.05). The multiple linear regression analysis indicated a significant positive correlation between gestational age and the five domains of ASQ-3 after adjustment for confounding factors including sex, age, body mass index, and parental education level (P < 0.01). Conclusions Children born preterm have poorer neurobehavioral development than those born full term and early term, whereas children born full term and early term have similar neurobehavioral development. Gestational age at birth is an independent influencing factor for neurobehavioral development in preschool children.

关键词

神经行为发育 / 早期儿 / 早产儿 / 学龄前儿童

Key words

Neurobehavioral development / Early term infant / Preterm infant / Preschool child

引用本文

导出引用
刘明霞, 戴霄天, 花静. 中国三城市25 254例不同出生胎龄儿童神经行为发育水平研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2020, 22(9): 931-935 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2003338
LIU Ming-Xia, DAI Xiao-Tian, HUA Jing. Neurobehavioral development of 25 254 children with different gestational ages at birth in three cities of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2020, 22(9): 931-935 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2003338

参考文献

[1] ACOG Committee Opinion No 579:definition of term pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(5):1139-1140.
[2] Delnord M, Zeitlin J. Epidemiology of late preterm and early term births-an international perspective[J]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 24(1):3-10.
[3] Mally PV, Agathis NT, Bailey SM. Early term infants are at increased risk of requiring neonatal intensive care[J]. World J Pediatr, 2016, 12(1):76-81.
[4] Kuzniewicz MW, Parker SJ, Schnake-Mahl A, et al. Hospital readmissions and emergency department visits in moderate preterm, late preterm, and early term infants[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2013, 40(4):753-775.
[5] Laptook AR. Neurologic and metabolic issues in moderately preterm, late preterm, and early term infants[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2013, 40(4):723-738.
[6] Hwang SS, Barfield WD, Smith RA, et al. Discharge timing, outpatient follow-up, and home care of late-preterm and early-term infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2013, 132(1):101-108.
[7] Rabie NZ, Bird TM, Magann EF, et al. ADHD and developmental speech/language disorders in late preterm, early term and term infants[J]. J Perinatol, 2015, 35(8):660-664.
[8] Rose O, Blanco E, Martinez SM, et al. Developmental scores at 1 year with increasing gestational age, 37-41 weeks[J]. Pediatrics, 2013, 131(5):e1475-e1481.
[9] 卞晓燕, 姚国英, Squires J, 等. 年龄与发育进程问卷上海市儿童常模及心理测量学特性研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2010, 48(7):492-496.
[10] 丁宗一, 杜丽蓉. 167065名中国0~7岁儿童BMI/Kaup指数研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2002, 40(4):222-224.
[11] Bolk J, Farooqi A, Hafström M, et al. Developmental coordination disorder and its association with developmental comorbidities at 6.5 years in apparently healthy children born extremely preterm[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2018, 172(8):765-774.
[12] Kwok C, Mackay M, Agnew JA, et al. Does the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 at 3 years of age predict developmental coordination disorder at 4.5 years of age in children born very preterm?[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2019, 84:36-42.
[13] Spittle A, Orton J, Anderson PJ, et al. Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015(11):CD005495.
[14] Allotey J, Zamora J, Cheong-See F, et al. Cognitive, motor, behavioural and academic performances of children born preterm:a meta-analysis and systematic review involving 64061 children[J]. BJOG, 2018, 125(1):16-25.
[15] Chatziioannidis I, Kyriakidou M, Exadaktylou S, et al. Neurological outcome at 6 and 12 months corrected age in hospitalised late preterm infants-a prospective study[J]. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2018, 22(4):602-609.
[16] Sumanasena SP, Vipulaguna DV, Mendis MM, et al. Beyond survival:5-year neurodevelopmental follow-up of a cohort of preterm infants in Colombo, Sri Lanka[J]. Paediatr Int Child Health, 2018, 38(2):128-136.
[17] Cheong JLY, Thompson DK, Olsen JE, et al. Late preterm births:new insights from neonatal neuroimaging and neurobehaviour[J]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 24(1):60-65.
[18] Huff K, Rose RS, Engle WA. Late preterm infants:morbidities, mortality, and management recommendations[J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2019, 66(2):387-402.
[19] Sahni R, Polin RA. Physiologic underpinnings for clinical problems in moderately preterm and late preterm infants[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2013, 40(4):645-663.
[20] 马腾, 周莉. 硫酸镁对早产儿脑神经保护作用的研究进展[J]. 中国医刊, 2020, 55(2):130-133.
[21] Chollat C, Sentilhes L, Marret S. Fetal neuroprotection by magnesium sulfate:from translational research to clinical application[J]. Front Neurol, 2018, 9:247.
[22] Gulati S, Sondhi V. Cerebral palsy:an overview[J]. Indian J Pediatr, 2018, 85(11):1006-1016.
[23] Quigley MA, Poulsen G, Boyle E, et al. Early term and late preterm birth are associated with poorer school performance at age 5 years:a cohort study[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2012, 97(3):F167-F173.
[24] Gurka MJ, LoCasale-Crouch J, Blackman JA. Long-term cognition, achievement, socioemotional, and behavioral development of healthy late-preterm infants[J]. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2010, 164(6):525-532.
[25] Chan E, Leong P, Malouf R, et al. Long-term cognitive and school outcomes of late-preterm and early-term births:a systematic review[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2016, 42(3):297-312.
[26] Nielsen TM, Pedersen MV, Milidou I, et al. Long-term cognition and behavior in children born at early term gestation:a systematic review[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2019, 98(10):1227-1234.
[27] Panfoli I, Candiano G, Malova M, et al. Oxidative stress as a primary risk factor for brain damage in preterm newborns[J]. Front Pediatr, 2018, 6:369.

基金

国家自然科学基金委员会面上项目(81673179);上海市申康医院发展中心适宜技术联合开发推广应用项目(SHDC120 16239);上海市营养学会课题(SHYY2018102)。


PDF(1150 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/