
融合团体箱庭疗法对Asperger综合征儿童的疗效
李国凯, 葛品, 刘桂华, 黄欣欣, 卢国斌, 王艳霞, 钱沁芳, 欧萍, 徐玉英
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3) : 234-238.
融合团体箱庭疗法对Asperger综合征儿童的疗效
Clinical effect of integrated sandplay therapy in children with Asperger syndrome
目的 探讨融合团体箱庭疗法对学龄前Asperger综合征(AS)儿童的临床效果。方法 将44例学龄前AS儿童作为研究对象,随机分成试验组和对照组,每组22例。对照组采用常规训练进行干预,试验组在常规训练的基础上,接受融合团体箱庭疗法。通过社交反应量表(SRS)、情绪识别工具和沙盘主题特征的变化评定治疗6个月后的疗效。结果 干预前试验组儿童SRS总分、各因子得分以及正立、倒置、上半面孔、下半面孔的面部表情识别正确率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与干预前比较,干预6个月后对照组和试验组儿童SRS总分和各因子得分均较前降低(P < 0.01);对照组除正立位外,其余位置表情识别正确率均较前增高(P < 0.05);试验组各位置表情识别正确率均较前增高(P < 0.05)。干预后试验组儿童SRS总分与除社交知觉因子外的其余各因子得分均低于对照组(P < 0.01);各位置表情识别正确率均高于对照组(P < 0.01)。试验组儿童干预前与干预后沙盘主题特征个数比较差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。结论 融合团体箱庭疗法可有效提高学龄前AS儿童的社交反应和情绪识别能力。
Objective To study the clinical effect of integrated sandplay therapy in preschool children with Asperger syndrome (AS). Methods A total of 44 preschool children with AS were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 22 children in each group. The children in the control group were given routine training, and those in the experimental group were given integrated sandplay therapy in addition to the routine training. The treatment response was assess by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), emotional recognition tools and changes in sandplay theme characteristics after 6 months of treatment. Results Before intervention, there were no signifcant differences between the two groups in the total score of SRS, the score of each factor of SRS, and correct rates of facial expression recognition of the upright position, inverted position, upper face and lower face (P > 0.05). After 6 months of intervention, both groups had signifcant reductions in the total score of SRS and the score of each factor of SRS (P < 0.01); the control group had signifcant increases in the correct rates of facial expression recognition of all positions except the upright position (P < 0.05), while the experimental group had significant increases in the correct rates of facial expression recognition of all positions (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group after intervention, the experimental group had significantly lower total score of SRS and scores of all factors of SRS except social perception (P < 0.01) and signifcantly higher correct rates of facial expression recognition of all positions (P < 0.01). The experimental group had a signifcant change in the number of sandplay theme characteristics after intervention (P < 0.01). Conclusions Integrated sandplay therapy can improve social responsiveness and emotion recognition ability in preschool children with AS.
Asperger综合征 / 箱庭疗法 / 融合 / 社交反应 / 情绪识别 / 儿童
Asperger syndrome / Sandplay therapy / Integration / Social responsiveness / Emotional recognition / Child
[1] 师乐, 李素霞, 邓佳慧, 等.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》 第5 版中谱系障碍的变化[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2015, 41(4):253-256.
[2] 李洪华, 单玲, 杜琳, 等. 儿童孤独症谱系障碍的治疗研究进展[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(8):886-892.
[3] Tiura M, Kim J, Detmers D, et al. Predictors of longitudinal ABA treatment outcomes for children with autism:a growth curve analysis[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2017, 70:185-197.
[4] 邵江洁, 李维君. 阿斯伯格综合征10例临床分析[J]. 江西医药, 2014, 49(12):1501-1502.
[5] 吕复莉, 谢晓凤, 张玲, 等. 引导式教育联合融合教育的护理方法对孤独症患儿社交能力的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(10):1194-1198.
[6] 姚嘉, 毛颖梅. 游戏治疗对轻度自闭症幼儿沟通能力影响的个案研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2011, 19(1):123-126.
[7] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[M]. 4th ed. Washington DC:American Psychiatric Association, 1994:75-77.
[8] Gau SF, Liu LT, Wu YY, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the social responsiveness scale[J]. Res Autism Spect Dis, 2013, 7(2):349-360.
[9] 陈秋如. 社交反应量表的修订和应用初步研究[D]. 广州:中山大学, 2009.
[10] Cen CQ, Liang YY, Chen QR, et al. Investigating the validation of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Social Responsiveness Scale in a Mainland China child population[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2017, 17(1):51.
[11] 郭嘉, 静进, 邹小兵, 等. 阿斯伯格综合征儿童对人物基本面部表情的识别特点[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(1):47-52.
[12] 蔡宝鸿. 初始沙盘及其临床诊断意义研究[D]. 广州:华南师范大学, 2005.
[13] 杜琳, 单玲, 王冰, 等. 孤独症谱系障碍患儿血清25(OH)D水平的检测[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(1):68-71.
[14] 梁亚勇, 陈凯云, 陈碧媛, 等. 共患注意缺陷多动障碍对学龄阿斯伯格综合征儿童学业及社交功能损害的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(7):709-711.
[15] Vernetti A, Senju A, Charman T, et al. Simulating interaction:using gaze-contingent eye-tracking to measure the reward value of social signals in toddlers with and without autism[J]. Dev Cogn Neurosci, 2018, 29:21-29.
[16] 潘宁, 吴桂花, 张玲, 等. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童智力发育与表情识别能力的关系[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2017, 19(3):275-279.
[17] 刘丹, 詹建英, 邵洁. 儿童孤独症谱系障碍的环境危险因素研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(11):1147-1153.
[18] 田金来, 张向葵. 同伴介入法在自闭症儿童社交能力中的应用[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2014(1):35-40.
[19] 蒋小丽, 陈顺森. 箱庭游戏:自闭症谱系障碍儿童社会认知特点的象征性表达[J]. 漳州师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2014, 27(2):119-125.
[20] 宋晓红, 李建明, 武克文, 等. 沙盘游戏疗法对抑郁焦虑共病患者康复效果的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2016, 16(12):1789-1791.
[21] 张雯, 张日昇, 孙凌. 近十年来箱庭疗法在中国的研究新进展[J]. 心理科学, 2010, 33(2):390-392.
[22] 刘超, 卢斌, 张瑜, 等. 机构结构化教育联合家庭康复训练治疗儿童孤独症的疗效观察[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(12):1277-1281.
福建省妇幼保健院科研基金(15-22)。