不同液体负荷状态对持续肾替代治疗脓毒症相关急性肾损伤患儿预后的影响

赖志君, 杨文海, 马可泽

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 279-284.

PDF(562 KB)
HTML
PDF(562 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3) : 279-284. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2111001
论著·临床研究

不同液体负荷状态对持续肾替代治疗脓毒症相关急性肾损伤患儿预后的影响

  • 赖志君, 杨文海, 马可泽
作者信息 +

Effect of fluid load on the prognosis of children with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy

  • LAI Zhi-Jun, YANG Wen-Hai, MA Ke-Ze
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 评估不同液体负荷(fluid load,FL)对使用持续肾替代治疗(continuous renal replacement therapy,CRRT)的脓毒症相关急性肾损伤(acute kidney injury,AKI)患儿预后的影响。 方法 回顾性选取2018年8月至2021年3月因脓毒症相关AKI行CRRT的患儿121例为研究对象,根据患儿从入院或病情变化开始至行CRRT前的不同FL分为低液体负荷组(n=35,FL<5%)、高液体负荷组(n=35,5%≤FL<10%)和液体超负荷组(n=51,FL≥10%)。收集各组患儿CRRT治疗前的基线资料和临床生化资料进行比较分析。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析各组间的28 d生存情况。采用多因素logistic回归分析影响不同FL状态患儿预后的危险因素。 结果 生存分析结果提示液体超负荷组患儿28 d病死率高于低液体负荷组和高液体负荷组(P<0.05);多因素logistic回归分析结果提示正超液体量增加为导致液体超负荷组患儿28 d病死率增高的危险因素,而CRRT开始时间提前为其保护因素(P<0.05)。 结论 CRRT开始前液体超负荷会增加脓毒症相关AKI患儿的病死率,对该类患儿应尽早行CRRT治疗。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of fluid load on the prognosis of children with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods A total of 121 children who underwent CRRT for sepsis-associated AKI from August 2018 to March 2021 were enrolled in the retrospective study. According to the fluid load from admission or disease progression to CRRT, they were divided into three groups: low fluid load (fluid load: <5%; n=35), high fluid load (fluid load: 5% - <10%; n=35), and fluid overload (fluid load: ≥10%; n=51). Baseline data and clinical biochemical data before CRRT were collected for comparison and analysis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was used for comparison of 28-day survival between groups. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the influencing factors for the prognosis of the children. Results The survival analysis showed that the fluid overload group had a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate than the low fluid load and high fluid load groups (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an increase in fluid overload volume was a risk factor for increased 28-day mortality in the fluid overload group, while earlier initiation of CRRT was a protective factor (P<0.05). Conclusions Fluid overload before CRRT may increase the mortality in children with sepsis-associated AKI, and CRRT should be performed for these children as early as possible.

关键词

脓毒症 / 急性肾损伤 / 液体负荷 / 持续肾替代治疗 / 儿童

Key words

Sepsis / Acute kidney injury / Fluid load / Continuous renal replacement therapy / Child

引用本文

导出引用
赖志君, 杨文海, 马可泽. 不同液体负荷状态对持续肾替代治疗脓毒症相关急性肾损伤患儿预后的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2022, 24(3): 279-284 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2111001
LAI Zhi-Jun, YANG Wen-Hai, MA Ke-Ze. Effect of fluid load on the prognosis of children with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2022, 24(3): 279-284 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2111001

参考文献

1 Wang YY, Sun B, Yue HN, et al. An epidemiologic survey of pediatric sepsis in regional hospitals in China[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2014, 15(9): 814-820. PMID: 25226498. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000247.
2 Selewski DT, Goldstein SL. The role of fluid overload in the prediction of outcome in acute kidney injury[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2018, 33(1): 13-24. PMID: 27900473. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3539-6.
3 Montomoli J, Donati A, Ince C. Acute kidney injury and fluid resuscitation in septic patients: are we protecting the kidney?[J]. Nephron, 2019, 143(3): 170-173. PMID: 31394531. PMCID: PMC6878740. DOI: 10.1159/000501748.
4 Kim IY, Kim JH, Lee DW, et al. Fluid overload and survival in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0172137. PMID: 28196107. PMCID: PMC5308862. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172137.
5 Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2020, 46(Suppl 1): 10-67. PMID: 32030529. PMCID: PMC7095013. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6.
6 No authors listed. Section 2: AKI definition[J]. Kidney Int Suppl (2011), 2012, 2(1): 19-36. PMID: 25018918. PMCID: PMC4089595. DOI: 10.1038/kisup.2011.32.
7 赖志君, 陈素君, 马可泽. 不同CRRT模式治疗儿童脓毒性肾损伤的疗效分析[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2019, 29(12): 12-14. DOI: 10.16458/j.cnki.1007-0893.2019.12.005.
8 Woodward CW, Lambert J, Ortiz-Soriano V, et al. Fluid overload associates with major adverse kidney events in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. Crit Care Med, 2019, 47(9): e753-e760. PMID: 31162196. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003862.
9 Muttath A, Annayappa Venkatesh L, Jose J, et al. Adverse outcomes due to aggressive fluid resuscitation in children: a prospective observational study[J]. J Pediatr Intensive Care, 2019, 8(2): 64-70. PMID: 31093457. PMCID: PMC6517050. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667009.
10 Sutherland SM, Zappitelli M, Alexander SR, et al. Fluid overload and mortality in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: the prospective pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy registry[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2010, 55(2): 316-325. PMID: 20042260. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.10.048.
11 Modem V, Thompson M, Gollhofer D, et al. Timing of continuous renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill children*[J]. Crit Care Med, 2014, 42(4): 943-953. PMID: 24231758. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000039.
12 Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(20): 2190-2199. PMID: 27209269. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.5828.
13 Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, et al. Timing of renal-replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury and sepsis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(15): 1431-1442. PMID: 30304656. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803213.
14 Bagshaw SM, Wald R, Adhikari NKJ, et al. Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(3): 240-251. PMID: 32668114. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000741.
15 Fang JJ, Wang MJ, Gong SJ, et al. Increased 28-day mortality due to fluid overload prior to continuous renal replacement in sepsis associated acute kidney injury[J]. Ther Apher Dial, 2021. PMID: 34436823. DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13727. Epub ahead of print.
16 Lin J, Ji XJ, Wang AY, et al. Timing of continuous renal replacement therapy in severe acute kidney injury patients with fluid overload: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Crit Care, 2021, 64: 226-236. PMID: 34034218. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.04.017.
17 Lee ST, Cho H. Fluid overload and outcomes in neonates receiving continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2016, 31(11): 2145-2152. PMID: 26975386. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3363-z.
18 徐靓, 王敏佳, 钱飞, 等. 老年脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患者持续肾脏替代治疗启动时液体过负荷与预后的相关性[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2020, 7(3): 1-6. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2020.03.001.
19 李玉婷, 李洪祥, 张东. 容量过负荷对接受持续肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者预后的影响[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(1): 68-74. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.01.013.


PDF(562 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/