基于列线图的儿童脓毒症早期诊断模型的建立

滕沁伶, 鞠梅, 刘章英, 贺晓春

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12) : 1345-1350.

PDF(745 KB)
HTML
PDF(745 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12) : 1345-1350. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2206055
论著·临床研究

基于列线图的儿童脓毒症早期诊断模型的建立

  • 滕沁伶1,2, 鞠梅2, 刘章英1, 贺晓春1
作者信息 +

Establishment of a nomogram model for the early diagnosis of childhood sepsis

  • TENG Qin-Ling, JU Mei, LIU Zhang-Ying, HE Xiao-Chun
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 建立儿童脓毒症早期诊断的列线图模型。 方法 回顾性选取2018年1月—2021年6月四川省妇幼保健院收治的76例儿童脓毒症患者为脓毒症组,根据性别、年龄(±2岁)进行1∶1∶1配对选择同期住院的局部感染患儿76例为局部感染组,非感染性疾病的76例患儿为对照组。比较3组患儿实验室指标、快速序贯器官衰竭评价(quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment,qSOFA)评分与小儿危重病例评分法(Pediatric Critical Illness Score,PCIS)评分,并采用多因素logistic回归分析评估上述指标与脓毒症的关联,根据多因素分析结果采用R4.1.3软件构建脓毒症早期诊断的列线图模型并对模型进行验证。以受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析法评估该模型的价值,再以Bootstrap法对该模型进行内部验证。 结果 多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,可溶性髓样细胞触发受体-1、qSOFA评分、PCIS评分、C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6及白细胞介素-10与儿童脓毒症独立相关(P<0.05)。将上述指标用于建立早期诊断脓毒症的列线图,ROC曲线下面积为0.837,95%CI为0.760~0.914,校准曲线结果显示平均绝对误差为0.024,模型表现与理想模型基本拟合。 结论 可溶性髓样细胞触发受体-1、qSOFA评分、PCIS评分、C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6及白细胞介素-10与儿童脓毒症独立相关,以上述指标建立的列线图模型对儿童脓毒症的早期诊断具有较高的区分度与准确度。

Abstract

Objective To establish a nomogram model for the early diagnosis of sepsis in children. Methods A total of 76 children with sepsis who were admitted to Sichuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively selected as the sepsis group. After matching for sex and age (±2 years) at a ratio of 1:1:1, 76 children with local infection who were hospitalized during the same period were enrolled as the local infection group, and 76 children with non-infectious diseases were enrolled as the control group. The three groups were compared in terms of laboratory markers and the results of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Pediatric Critical Illness Score (PCIS). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the above indicators and sepsis. R4.1.3 software was used to establish and validate the nomogram model for the early diagnosis of sepsis based on the results of the multivariate analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the value of the nomogram model, and the Bootstrap method was used to perform the internal validation of the model. Results The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1, qSOFA score, PCIS score, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 were independently associated with childhood sepsis (P<0.05). The above indicators were used to establish a nomogram for the early diagnosis of sepsis, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.837 (95%CI: 0.760-0.914), and the calibration curve results showed a mean absolute error of 0.024, suggesting that the performance of this model was basically consistent with that of the ideal model. Conclusions The indicators soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1, qSOFA score, PCIS score, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 are independently associated with childhood sepsis, and the nomogram model established based on these indicators has high discriminatory ability and accuracy in the early diagnosis of sepsis in children.

关键词

脓毒症 / 早期诊断 / 多因素分析 / 列线图 / 儿童

Key words

Sepsis / Early diagnosis / Multivariate analysis / Nomogram / Child

引用本文

导出引用
滕沁伶, 鞠梅, 刘章英, 贺晓春. 基于列线图的儿童脓毒症早期诊断模型的建立[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2022, 24(12): 1345-1350 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2206055
TENG Qin-Ling, JU Mei, LIU Zhang-Ying, HE Xiao-Chun. Establishment of a nomogram model for the early diagnosis of childhood sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2022, 24(12): 1345-1350 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2206055

参考文献

1 陈雪婷, 钱素云. 全球儿童脓毒症流行病学及病原学研究进展[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2019, 57(5): 380-383. PMID: 31060134. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.05.014.
2 Piccioni A, Saviano A, Cicchinelli S, et al. Proadrenomedullin in sepsis and septic shock: a role in the emergency department[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2021, 57(9): 920. PMID: 34577843. PMCID: PMC8472723. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57090920.
3 Raveendran AV, Kumar A, Gangadharan S. Biomarkers and newer laboratory investigations in the diagnosis of sepsis[J]. J R Coll Physicians Edinb, 2019, 49(3): 207-216. PMID: 31497788. DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2019.308.
4 朱梦莉, 彭丽清, 袁光新, 等. SIRS标准与SOFA和qSOFA评分对急诊疑似感染患者的预后预测价值[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(19): 2894-2898. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2019-182922.
5 林吉霞, 罗晶, 袁芳芳, 等. 可溶性髓样细胞触发受体-1在化脓性关节炎诊断及疗效评价分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(2): 219-223. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2019-174269.
6 中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组, 中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组, 中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会. 儿童脓毒性休克(感染性休克)诊治专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015, 53(8): 576-580. PMID: 26717653. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2015.08.007.
7 胡亚美, 江载芳. 诸福棠实用儿科学[M]. 7版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 102-104.
8 顾晓蕾, 邵杰, 张碧波, 等. qSOFA评分对不同年龄脓毒症患者早期诊断准确性的研究[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2021, 33(7): 798-802. PMID: 34412747. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201119-00720.
9 小儿危重病例评分试用协作组. 小儿危重病例评分法(草案)临床应用的评价[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 1998, 36(10): 579-582. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:0578-1310.1998.10.001.
10 Cillóniz C, Rodríguez-Hurtado D, Nicolini A, et al. Clinical approach to community-acquired pneumonia[J]. J Thorac Imaging, 2018, 33(5): 273-281. PMID: 30005000. DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000343.
11 Riedel S. Predicting bacterial versus viral infection, or none of the above: current and future prospects of biomarkers[J]. Clin Lab Med, 2019, 39(3): 453-472. PMID: 31383268. DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.05.011.
12 Wilson T, Cooksley T, Churchill S, et al. Retrospective analysis of cancer patients admitted to a tertiary centre with suspected neutropenic sepsis: are C-reactive protein and neutrophil count useful prognostic biomarkers?[J]. J Intensive Care Soc, 2018, 19(2): 132-137. PMID: 29796070. PMCID: PMC5956692. DOI: 10.1177/1751143717741248.
13 Wright SW, Kaewarpai T, Lovelace-Macon L, et al. A 2-biomarker model augments clinical prediction of mortality in melioidosis[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2021, 72(5): 821-828. PMID: 32034914. PMCID: PMC7935382. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa126.
14 Candel FJ, Borges Sá M, Belda S, et al. Current aspects in sepsis approach. Turning things around[J]. Rev Esp Quimioter, 2018, 31(4): 298-315. PMID: 29938972. PMCID: PMC6172679.
15 Schmidt-Hieber M, Teschner D, Maschmeyer G, et al. Management of febrile neutropenia in the perspective of antimicrobial de-escalation and discontinuation[J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2019, 17(12): 983-995. PMID: 30686067. DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1573670.
16 Silo?i CA, Silo?i I, P?dureanu V, et al. Sepsis and identification of reliable biomarkers for postoperative period prognosis[J]. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2018, 59(1): 77-91. PMID: 29940615.
17 Richard-Greenblatt M, Boillat-Blanco N, Zhong K, et al. Prognostic accuracy of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (sTREM-1)-based algorithms in febrile adults presenting to Tanzanian outpatient clinics[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2020, 70(7): 1304-1312. PMID: 31102510. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz419.
18 Proceedings of Réanimation 2019, the French Intensive Care Society International Congress[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2019, 9(Suppl 1): 1-153. PMID: 30924032. PMCID: PMC6439134. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-018-0474-7.
19 Varo R, Erice C, Johnson S, et al. Clinical trials to assess adjuvant therapeutics for severe malaria[J]. Malar J, 2020, 19(1): 268. PMID: 32709257. PMCID: PMC7382078. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03340-3.
20 Madenci AL, Armstrong LB, Kwon NK, et al. Incidence and risk factors for sepsis after childhood splenectomy[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2019, 54(7): 1445-1448. PMID: 30029846. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.024.

基金

四川省卫生和计划生育委员会课题(17ZD031)。

PDF(745 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/