单胎濒死儿发生的围生期危险因素分析

杨旻; 汪吉梅

doi:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2207108

PDF(556 KB)

HTML

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1) : 18-24. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2207108

论著·临床研究

单胎濒死儿发生的围生期危险因素分析

杨旻, 汪吉梅

作者信息 +

Perinatal risk factors for the occurrence of singleton apparently stillborn infants

YANG Min, WANG Ji-Mei

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨单胎濒死儿发生的围生期危险因素，为濒死儿综合诊治提供依据。方法该研究为病例对照研究。选取2006年1月—2015年12月在复旦大学附属妇产科医院出生的154例胎龄≥28周、1 min Apgar评分为0~1分的单胎新生儿为病例组（濒死组），按1∶4比例随机选取616例同期出生的单胎非濒死儿（1 min Apgar评分>1分）为对照组，采用单因素分析和多因素logistic回归分析评估濒死儿发生的围生期危险因素。结果濒死组胎龄和出生体重均显著低于对照组（P<0.05）。濒死组胎儿水肿、脐带脱垂、羊水Ⅲ度污染、胎盘早剥、臀位、重度子痫前期、母亲产时全麻、产前胎心监护异常、产前胎动减少发生比例显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。多因素logistic回归分析显示母亲产时全麻（OR=34.520）、产前胎动减少（OR=28.168）、胎盘早剥（OR=15.641）、羊水Ⅲ度污染（OR=6.365）、产前胎心监护异常（OR=5.739）、臀位（OR=2.614）是濒死儿发生的危险因素（P<0.05），胎龄较大（OR=0.686）是濒死儿发生的保护因素（P<0.05）。结论临床需对产前胎心监护异常、胎动减少、早产、胎盘早剥、臀位、羊水Ⅲ度污染、全麻手术的产妇引起重视，做好新生儿复苏准备，防范濒死儿的发生。

Abstract

Objective To identify the perinatal risk factors for the occurrence of singleton apparently stillborn infants. Methods This was a case-control study. A total of 154 singleton neonates with gestational age ≥28 weeks and Apgar score of 0-1 who were subsequently successfully resuscitated in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January 2006 to December 2015 were enrolled as the case group (apparently stillborn group). A total of 616 singleton infants born from January 2006 to December 2015 (1-minute Apgar score >1) were randomly selected in a 1:4 ratio as the control group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the perinatal risk factors for the occurrence of apparently stillborn infants. Results The gestational age and birth weight in the apparently stillborn group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidences of fetal hydrops, cord prolapse, grade III meconium-stained amniotic fluid, placental abruption, breech presentation, severe pre-eclampsia, maternal general anesthesia at delivery, abnormal antenatal fetal heart monitoring and decreased fetal movement were significantly higher in the apparently stillborn group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic analysis showed that the mother had general anesthesia at delivery (OR=34.520), decreased antenatal fetal movement (OR=28.168),placental abruption (OR=15.641), grade III meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR=6.365), abnormal antenatal fetal heart monitoring (OR=5.739), and breech presentation (OR=2.614) were risk factors for the occurrence of apparently stillborn infants (P<0.05), while higher gestational age was a protective factor (OR=0.686, P<0.05). Conclusions Attention needs to be paid to mothers with abnormal prenatal fetal heart monitoring, decreased fetal movement, preterm labor, placental abruption, breech presentation, grade III meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and general anesthesia. Preparations for resuscitation should be done to rescue apparently stillborn infants.

导出引用

杨旻, 汪吉梅. 单胎濒死儿发生的围生期危险因素分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2023, 25(1): 18-24 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2207108

YANG Min, WANG Ji-Mei. Perinatal risk factors for the occurrence of singleton apparently stillborn infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2023, 25(1): 18-24 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2207108

参考文献

1 APGAR V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant[J]. Curr Res Anesth Analg, 1953, 32(4): 260-267. PMID: 13083014.
2 Nelson K, Simonsen SE, Henry E, et al. The apparently stillborn infant: risk factors, incidence, and neonatal outcome[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2011, 28(1): 75-82. PMID: 20645239. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262906.
3 Thomson AJ, Searle M, Russell G. Quality of survival after severe birth asphyxia[J]. Arch Dis Child, 1977, 52(8): 620-626. PMID: 921307. PMCID: PMC1544624. DOI: 10.1136/adc.52.8.620.
4 封志纯, 祝益民, 肖昕. 实用儿童重症医学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 69-75.
5 余彦亮, 张谦慎, 杨传忠, 等. 影响1 min Apgar评分0～1分新生儿的围产期因素及复苏后结局分析[J]. 中国新生儿科杂志, 2015, 30(5): 331-334. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6710.2015.05.003.
6 杨传忠, 朱小瑜. 新生儿重度窒息濒死儿复苏方法的建议[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2016, 19(1): 7-11. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2016.01.003.
7 Scott H. Outcome of very severe birth asphyxia[J]. Arch Dis Child, 1976, 51(9): 712-716. PMID: 1033733. PMCID: PMC1546242. DOI: 10.1136/adc.51.9.712.
8 Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GC, et al. Apgar score and the risk of cause-specific infant mortality: a population-based cohort study[J]. Lancet, 2014, 384(9956): 1749-1755. PMID: 25236409. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61135-1.
9 Li F, Wu T, Lei X, et al. The apgar score and infant mortality[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e69072. PMID: 23922681. PMCID: PMC3726736. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069072.
10 Phipps E, Prasanna D, Brima W, et al. Preeclampsia: updates in pathogenesis, definitions, and guidelines[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 11(6): 1102-1113. PMID: 27094609. PMCID: PMC4891761. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12081115.
11 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 前置胎盘的临床诊断与处理指南[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2013, 48(2): 148-150. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2013.02.016.
12 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 胎盘早剥的临床诊断与处理规范(第1版)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2012, 47(12): 957-958. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2012.12.022.
13 Practice bulletins No. 139: premature rupture of membranes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(4): 918-930. PMID: 24084566. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435415.21944.8f.
14 中华医学会妇产科分会产科学组, 中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组. 妊娠合并糖尿病临床诊断与治疗推荐指南(草案)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2007, 10(4): 283-285. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2007.04.022.
15 中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(4): 227-238. PMID: 32375429. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200114-00039.
16 朱丽, 张蓉, 张淑莲. 中国不同胎龄新生儿出生体重曲线研制[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015, 53(2): 97-103. PMID: 25876683. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2015.02.007.
17 Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2008, 37(5): 510-515. PMID: 18761565. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00284.x.
18 徐丛剑, 华克勤. 实用妇产科学[M]. 4版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 150.
19 Yeo CL, Tudehope DI. Outcome of resuscitated apparently stillborn infants: a ten year review[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 1994, 30(2): 129-133. PMID: 8198846. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1994.tb00596.x.
20 Casalaz DM, Marlow N, Speidel BD. Outcome of resuscitation following unexpected apparent stillbirth[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 1998, 78(2): F112-F115. PMID: 9577280. PMCID: PMC1720775. DOI: 10.1136/fn.78.2.f112.
21 Jain L, Ferre C, Vidyasagar D, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of apparently stillborn infants: survival and long-term outcome[J]. J Pediatr, 1991, 118(5): 778-782. PMID: 2019934. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80046-0.
22 Huang CJ, Fan YC, Tsai PS. Differential impacts of modes of anaesthesia on the risk of stroke among preeclamptic women who undergo caesarean delivery: a population-based study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2010, 105(6): 818-826. PMID: 20926478. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq266.
23 Maisonneuve E, Audibert F, Guilbaud L, et al. Risk factors for severe neonatal acidosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 118(4): 818-823. PMID: 21934444. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822c9198.
24 Downes KL, Grantz KL, Shenassa ED. Maternal, labor, delivery, and perinatal outcomes associated with placental abruption: a systematic review[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2017, 34(10): 935-957. PMID: 28329897. PMCID: PMC5683164. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599149.
25 Haddad B, Mercer BM, Livingston JC, et al. Obstetric antecedents to apparent stillbirth (Apgar score zero at 1 minute only)[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 97(6): 961-964. PMID: 11384703. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01352-7.
26 Tikkanen M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2011, 90(2): 140-149. PMID: 21241259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01030.x.
27 Kingston NJ, Baillie T, Chan YF, et al. Pulmonary embolization by chorionic villi causing maternal death after a car crash[J]. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 2003, 24(2): 193-197. PMID: 12773861. DOI: 10.1097/01.PAF.0679069504.53671.05.
28 ACOG educational bulletin. Obstetric aspects of trauma management. Number 251, September 1998 (replaces Number 151, January 1991, and Number 161, November 1991). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 1999, 64(1): 87-94. PMID: 10190681.
29 Heazell AE, Fr?en JF. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008, 28(2): 147-154. PMID: 18393008. DOI: 10.1080/01443610801912618.
30 O'Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale E, et al. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 29(8): 705-710. PMID: 19821662. DOI: 10.3109/01443610903229598.
31 Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, et al. Maternal perception of fetal activity and late stillbirth risk: findings from the Auckland stillbirth study[J]. Birth, 2011, 38(4): 311-316. PMID: 22112331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00490.x.
32 Ahanya SN, Lakshmanan J, Morgan BL, et al. Meconium passage in utero: mechanisms, consequences, and management[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2005, 60(1): 45-56. PMID: 15618919. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000149659.89530.c2.
33 Jacques SM, Qureshi F. Does in utero meconium passage in term stillbirth correlate with autopsy and placental findings of hypoxia or inflammation?[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(10): 1853-1859. PMID: 32460571. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1770217.
34 Gardner MO, Goldenberg RL, Gaudier FL, et al. Predicting low Apgar scores of infants weighing less than 1000 grams: the effect of corticosteroids[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 85(2): 170-174. PMID: 7824226. DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00372-K.
35 Macharey G, Gissler M, Rahkonen L, et al. Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors: a nationwide population based cohort study[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2017, 295(4): 833-838. PMID: 28176014. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4283-7.
36 Zsirai L, Csákány GM, Vargha P, et al. Breech presentation: its predictors and consequences. An analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer Obstetric Database (1996-2011)[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2016, 95(3): 347-354. PMID: 26660231. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12834.
37 Swedish Collaborative Breech Study Group. Term breech delivery in Sweden: mortality relative to fetal presentation and planned mode of delivery[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2005, 84(6): 593-601. PMID: 15901273. DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00852.x.
38 Catlin EA, Carpenter MW, Brann BS 4th , et al. The Apgar score revisited: influence of gestational age[J]. J Pediatr, 1986, 109(5): 865-868. PMID: 3772665. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80715-6.