深圳市24家医院极/超早产儿产房过渡期管理的横断面调查

深圳新生儿数据协作网

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 250-257.

PDF(596 KB)
HTML
PDF(596 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 250-257. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2308017
论著·临床研究

深圳市24家医院极/超早产儿产房过渡期管理的横断面调查

  • 深圳新生儿数据协作网
作者信息 +

A cross-sectional survey of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in 24 hospitals in Shenzhen City

  • Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 了解深圳市极/超早产儿产房过渡期管理实施现状。 方法 2022年11月对深圳新生儿数据协作网的24家三级医院的极/超早产儿产房过渡期管理实施情况进行横断面调查,调查内容包括产前准备、产房复苏实施和新生儿重症监护室复苏后管理。根据胎龄将所纳入早产儿分为4组:<26周、26~28+6周、29~30+6周和31~31+6周组,对结果进行描述性分析。 结果 共纳入140例极/超早产儿,其中<26周组10例,26~28+6周组45例,29~30+6周组49例,31~31+6周组36例。140例极/超早产儿中,99例(70.7%)接受了产前咨询,提供产前咨询的人员以产科医生为主,占比为79.8%;产时参与复苏的人员主要为助产士(96.4%)和新生儿科住院医师(62.1%);52例(37.1%)实施了延迟脐带结扎,平均延迟时间为(45±17)s;137例(97.9%)生后采用了预热辐射台保暖;110例(78.6%)需要正压通气,其中67例(60.9%)采用T组合复苏器,42例(38.2%)应用了空氧混合仪;119例(85.0%)复苏中进行了血氧饱和度监测;完成过渡期各项措施至关闭温箱门时间的中位数为87 min。 结论 在深圳新生儿数据协作网医院中,极/超早产儿的产房过渡期管理实施与我国相应专家共识的要求存在不同程度的差异,需要通过多中心协作的持续质量改进缩小差距,从而改善极/超早产儿产房过渡期管理的质量和结局。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the current status of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in Shenzhen City. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in November 2022, involving 24 tertiary hospitals participating in the Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network. The survey assessed the implementation of transitional care management in the delivery room, including prenatal preparation, delivery room resuscitation, and post-resuscitation management in the neonatal intensive care unit. Very/extremely preterm infants were divided into four groups based on gestational age: <26 weeks, 26-28+6 weeks, 29-30+6 weeks, and 31-31+6 weeks. Descriptive analysis was performed on the results. Results A total of 140 very/extremely preterm infants were included, with 10 cases in the <26 weeks group, 45 cases in the 26-28+6 weeks group, 49 cases in the 29-30+6 weeks group, and 36 cases in the 31-31+6 weeks group. Among these infants, 99 (70.7%) received prenatal counseling, predominantly provided by obstetricians (79.8%). The main personnel involved in resuscitation during delivery were midwives (96.4%) and neonatal resident physicians (62.1%). Delayed cord clamping was performed in 52 cases (37.1%), with an average delay time of (45±17) seconds. Postnatal radiant warmer was used in 137 cases (97.9%) for thermoregulation. Positive pressure ventilation was required in 110 cases (78.6%), with 67 cases (60.9%) using T-piece resuscitators and 42 cases (38.2%) using a blended oxygen device. Blood oxygen saturation was monitored during resuscitation in 119 cases (85.0%). The median time from initiating transitional care measures to closing the incubator door was 87 minutes. Conclusions The implementation of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in the hospitals participating in the Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network shows varying degrees of deviation from the corresponding expert consensus in China. It is necessary to bridge the gap through continuous quality improvement and multicenter collaboration to improve the quality of the transitional care management and outcomes in very/extremely preterm infants.

关键词

过渡期管理 / 横断面调查 / 深圳 / 极早产儿 / 超早产儿

Key words

Transitional care management / Cross-sectional survey / Shenzhen / Very preterm infant / Extremely preterm infant

引用本文

导出引用
深圳新生儿数据协作网. 深圳市24家医院极/超早产儿产房过渡期管理的横断面调查[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2024, 26(3): 250-257 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2308017
Shenzhen Neonatal Data Network. A cross-sectional survey of delivery room transitional care management for very/extremely preterm infants in 24 hospitals in Shenzhen City[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2024, 26(3): 250-257 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2308017

参考文献

1 Wyckoff MH, Wyllie J, Aziz K, et al. Neonatal life support 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations[J]. Resuscitation, 2020, 156: A156-A187. PMID: 33098917. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.015.
2 Li SJ, Feng Q, Tian XY, et al. Delivery room resuscitation and short-term outcomes of extremely preterm and extremely low birth weight infants: a multicenter survey in North China[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(13): 1561-1568. PMID: 34133350. PMCID: PMC8280058. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001499.
3 中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会, 中国医院协会妇产医院管理分会围产医学学组, 中国妇幼保健协会新生儿保健专业委员会. 极早产儿产房过渡期管理专家共识[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2022, 25(6): 401-411. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20220108-00027.
4 江苏省新生儿复苏临床研究协作组. 江苏省28家医院胎龄<32周早产儿早期稳定管理状况调查[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志(中英文), 2023, 38(1): 12-17. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2023.01.004.
5 Isayama T. The clinical management and outcomes of extremely preterm infants in Japan: past, present, and future[J]. Transl Pediatr, 2019, 8(3): 199-211. PMID: 31413954. PMCID: PMC6675688. DOI: 10.21037/tp.2019.07.10.
6 Kleinhout MY, Stevens MM, Osman KA, et al. Evidence-based interventions to reduce mortality among preterm and low-birthweight neonates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ Glob Health, 2021, 6(2): e003618. PMID: 33602687. PMCID: PMC7896575. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003618.
7 Cao Y, Jiang S, Sun J, et al. Assessment of neonatal intensive care unit practices, morbidity, and mortality among very preterm infants in China[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(8): e2118904. PMID: 34338792. PMCID: PMC8329742. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18904.
8 Shah V, Hodgson K, Seshia M, et al. Golden hour management practices for infants <32 weeks gestational age in Canada[J]. Paediatr Child Health, 2018, 23(4): e70-e76. PMID: 30038535. PMCID: PMC6007305. DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx175.
9 Schuler R, Bedei I, Oehmke F, et al. Neonatal outcome and treatment perspectives of preterm infants at the border of viability[J]. Children (Basel), 2022, 9(3): 313. PMID: 35327684. PMCID: PMC8946876. DOI: 10.3390/children9030313.
10 Fish R, Weber A, Crowley M, et al. Early antenatal counseling in the outpatient setting for high-risk pregnancies: a randomized control trial[J]. J Perinatol, 2021, 41(7): 1595-1604. PMID: 33510421. PMCID: PMC10718404. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-00933-x.
11 Gaucher N, Nadeau S, Barbier A, et al. Antenatal consultations for preterm labour: how are future mothers reassured?[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2018, 103(1): F36-F42. PMID: 28588124. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312448.
12 吴艳, 钟晓云, 周利刚, 等. “早产儿过渡期干预措施”改进对超早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2022, 25(4): 263-270. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20210906-00770.
13 Pozzi N, Cocca F, Pannella G, et al. Obstetric education and neonatal resuscitation at birth: an Italian survey[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(21): 4060-4064. PMID: 33203285. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1846701.
14 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组, 中华儿科杂志编辑委员会. 出生胎龄<32周早产儿复苏临床实践指南(2022)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2023, 61(1): 6-15. PMID: 36594115. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20221027-00912.
15 董小玥, 孙小凡, 李萌萌, 等. 延迟脐带结扎对胎龄<32周早产儿的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2016, 18(7): 635-638. PMID: 27412548. PMCID: PMC7388993. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2016.07.013.
16 Leslie MS, Greene J, Schulkin J, et al. Umbilical cord clamping practices of U.S. obstetricians[J]. J Neonatal Perinatal Med, 2018, 11(1): 51-60. PMID: 29689745. DOI: 10.3233/NPM-181729.
17 Rabe H, Gyte GM, Díaz-Rossello JL, et al. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 9(9): CD003248. PMID: 31529790. PMCID: PMC6748404. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub4.
18 Surak A, Elsayed Y. Delayed cord clamping: time for physiologic implementation[J]. J Neonatal Perinatal Med, 2022, 15(1): 19-27. PMID: 34219673. DOI: 10.3233/NPM-210745.
19 钱苗, 余章斌, 陈小慧, 等. 不同强度复苏的出生体重<1 500 g早产儿临床特征分析: 多中心回顾性调查[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2021, 23(6): 593-598. PMID: 34130781. PMCID: PMC8214002. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101142.
20 Wang SL, Chen C, Gu XY, et al. Delivery room resuscitation intensity and associated neonatal outcomes of 24+0-31+6 weeks' preterm infants in China: a retrospective cross-sectional study[J]. World J Pediatr, 2023. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37389785. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-023-00738-2.
21 Singh Y, Oddie S. Marked variation in delivery room management in very preterm infants[J]. Resuscitation, 2013, 84(11): 1558-1561. PMID: 23948446. PMCID: PMC3828483. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.06.026.
22 Izquierdo M, Iriondo M, Ruiz C, et al. Survey of neonatal resuscitation practices showed post-training improvements but need to reinforce preterm management, monitoring and adrenaline use[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2017, 106(6): 897-903. PMID: 28218962. DOI: 10.1111/apa.13791.
23 Hodgson KA, Owen LS, Lui K, et al. Neonatal golden hour: a survey of Australian and New Zealand neonatal network units' early stabilisation practices for very preterm infants[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2021, 57(7): 990-997. PMID: 33543835. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.15360.
24 Harriman TL, Carter B, Dail RB, et al. Golden hour protocol for preterm infants: a quality improvement project[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2018, 18(6): 462-470. PMID: 30212389. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000554.

基金

深圳市科技计划资助(JCYJ20210324114213037)。

PDF(596 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/