对慢性病患儿及其父母教育干预的效果研究

李杨; 魏珉; Gayle PAGE; Susan IMMELT; 鲁重美

PDF(997 KB)

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 462-467.

论著·临床研究

对慢性病患儿及其父母教育干预的效果研究

李杨，魏珉，Gayle PAGE，Susan IMMELT，鲁重美

作者信息 +

Effectiveness of educational interventions in children with chronic diseases and their parents

LI Yang, WEI Min, Gayle PAGE, Susan IMMELT, LU Chong-Mei

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的：评价针对慢性病患儿及其父母的教育干预措施的效果，为临床建立系统的针对慢性病患儿及其父母的教育干预项目提供依据。方法：50名慢性病患儿和75名慢性病患儿父母为研究对象。干预组为2007年8月至2008年1月住院的患儿及其父母,对照组为2007年2月~7月住院的患儿及其父母。患儿入院2 d后开始教育干预，内容包括疾病知识、自我管理、用药知识和应对技巧等。在患儿出院前1天、出院后3个月时评价两组患儿及患儿父母的知识水平、应激源、应对方式、心理状态及服药依从性。结果：教育干预后，干预组患儿父母及患儿的知识问卷得分均高于对照组(P<0.01)，应激源数均低于对照组(P<0.01，P<0.05)；干预组患儿父母“通过咨询和交流获取信息”的积极应对方式的使用频率高于对照组(P<0.05)；但两组患儿用药依从性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：教育干预可以提高慢性病患儿及父母疾病知识水平，减少患儿及父母的应激源数，使父母更多地采用积极的应对方式，但对改善患儿及父母的焦虑、抑郁状态无明显作用。［中国当代儿科杂志，2010，12（6）：462-467］

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in children with chronic illness and their parents. METHODS: Fifty children with chronic illness and 75 parents participated in the study. Children who were hospitalized between August 2007 and January 2008 and their parents received educational sessions and those who were hospitalized between February and July 2007 and who did not receive the sessions served as the control group. The content of the educational sessions included knowledge of chronic disease, drugs and self-care, and coping skills. The knowledge level, stressors, coping strategies, and psychological conditions of children with chronic illness and their parents were evaluated before discharge and three months after discharge. RESULTS: After educational interventions, the knowledge levels of children and their parents increased and the stressors decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. The children's parents in the intervention group used more active coping strategies (understanding the medical situations through communication with medical staff) than those in the control group. The differences in the medication compliance of children between the two groups were not found. CONCLUSIONS: The educational interventions may result in an improved knowledge level and decrease stressors in children and their parents, and improve stress coping strategies in parents. There is no evidence that the educational intervention can improve the psychosocial conditions of children and their parents.［Chin J Contemp Pediatr, 2010, 12 (6):462-467］

导出引用

李杨, 魏珉, Gayle PAGE, Susan IMMELT, 鲁重美. 对慢性病患儿及其父母教育干预的效果研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2010, 12(06): 462-467

LI Yang, WEI Min, Gayle PAGE, Susan IMMELT, LU Chong-Mei. Effectiveness of educational interventions in children with chronic diseases and their parents[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2010, 12(06): 462-467

中图分类号： R193

参考文献

［1］Judson L. Global childhood chronic illness［J］. Nurs Admin Q, 2004, 28(1):60-66.
［2］Yeo M, Sawyer S. Chronic illness and disability［J］. BMJ, 2005, 330(1):721-723.
［3］Barlow JH, Ellard DR. The psychosocial wellbeing of children with chronic disease, their parents and siblings: an overview of the research evidence base［J］. Child Care Health Dev, 2005, 32(1):19-31.
［4］Meleski DD. Family with chronically ill children: a literature review examines approaches to helping them cope［J］. AJN, 2002, 102(5):48-54.
［5］Drotar D, Witherspoon DO, Zebracki K, Peterson CC. Psychological interventions in childhood chronic illness［M］. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006:1-20.
［6］McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA, Patterson JM, Cauble AE, Wilson LR, Warwick W. CHIP-Coping Health Inventory for Parents: an assessment of parental coping patterns in the care of the chronically ill children［J］. J Marriage Family, 1983, 45(2):359-370.
［7］Petersen C, Schmidt S, Bullinger M; The DISABKIDS Group. Brief report: development and pilot testing of a coping questionnaire for children and adolescents with chronic health conditions［J］. J Pediatr Psychol, 2004, 29(8):636-640.
［8］Hagglund KJ, Doyle NM, Clay DL, Frank RG, Johnson JC, Pressly TA. A family retreat as a comprehensive intervention for children with arthritis and their families［J］.Arthr Care Res, 1996, 9(1):35-41.
［9］Kaslow NJ, Collins MH, Rashid FL, Baskin ML, Griffith JR, Hollins L. The efficacy of a pilot family psychoeducational intervention for pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD)［J］. Families, Systems Health, 2000, 18(4):381-404.
［10］楚平华. 对癫癎患儿家长实施健康教育的效果观察［J］.护理学杂志，2003，18（9）：705-706.
［11］周雪梅，韦琴，王琳琳. 开展家长健康教育对提高癫癎患儿遵医行为研究［J］. 护理学杂志，2005，20（3）：49-51.
［12］梁宝勇主编. 精神压力、应对与健康——应激与应对的临床心理学研究［M］. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2006: 108-109.
［13］刘仁莲，叶德琴，欧阳卓谊，蔡花中，黄芯茹，唐群英. 护理干预对减轻肾病综合征患儿和家长焦虑的研究［J］. 现代临床护理，2004，6（3）：11-12.
［14］Rapoff MA, Belmot J, Lindsley C, Olson N, Morris J, Padur J. Prevention of nonadherence to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications for newly diagnosed patients with Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis［J］. Health Psychology, 2002, 21(1):620-623.
［15］梁海华，刘晓红，谢巧庆，余慕雪，张婷婷. 健康教育对肾病综合征患儿激素应用依从性的影响［J］. 现代临床护理，2004，3（2）：156-157.
［16］Fisher HR. The needs of parents with chronically sick children: a literature review［J］. JAN, 2001, 36(4):600-607.