新生大鼠反复惊厥对皮质区糖皮质激素受体表达的影响

王团美; 薄涛; 王曼芝; 朱晓华; 里健; 李杏芳; 毛定安

PDF(1119 KB)

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 47-50.

论著·实验研究

新生大鼠反复惊厥对皮质区糖皮质激素受体表达的影响

王团美，薄涛，王曼芝，朱晓华，里健，李杏芳，毛定安

作者信息 +

Effects of neonatal recurrent seizures on glucocorticoid receptor expression in the rat brain

WANG Tuan-Mei, BO Tao, WANG Man-Zhi, ZHU Xiao-Hua, LI Jian, LI Xing-Fang, MAO Ding-An

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的：研究新生期反复惊厥对大鼠大脑皮层内糖皮质激素受体（glucocorticoid receptor, GR）表达的影响。方法：生后（postnatal，PN）7 d的Sprague-Dawley大鼠48只，随机分成两组，惊厥组每日吸入三氟乙醚诱导惊厥发作1次，每次持续30 min，连续6 d；对照组同样操作但不吸入三氟乙醚。分别于PN13 d、15 d和19 d每组各处死8只大鼠，Western blot法和免疫组化法观察大鼠大脑皮层GR表达的变化。结果：与对照组相比，在PN-15 d时惊厥组大鼠大脑皮层胞浆中GR的表达明显下调（P<0.01），在PN-15 d、PN-19 d时胞核中GR表达水平明显下调（P<0.05）。与对照组相比较，PN-13 d时，惊厥组大鼠顶叶区GR免疫化学累积光密度（AOD）明显降低（P<0.05）；PN-15 d时，惊厥组大鼠皮层顶叶区GR免疫化学AOD明显降低（P<0.01）；PN-19 d时，惊厥组大鼠皮层顶叶、颞叶、额叶区GR免疫化学AOD明显降低（P<0.01）。结论：新生大鼠反复惊厥造成皮质GR表达的异常，可能参与发育期脑损伤。［中国当代儿科杂志，2010，12（1）：47-50］

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effets of flurothyl-induced neonatal recurrent seizures on glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression in the rat brain. METHODS: Forty-eight seven-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups: control and seizure. Seizures were induced by inhalant flurothyl daily for six consecutive days. Brains were sampled on postnatal days 13, 15 and 19. The expression of GR protein in the cerebral cortex was detected by Western blot and immunohistochemical method. RESULTS: The expression of GR in the cerebral cortical plasma protein was significantly lower in the seizure group than in the control group on postnatal day 15. The expression of GR protein in the cerebral cortical nuclear protein decreased significantly in the seizure group compared with that in the control group on postnatal days 15 and 19 (P<0.05). Compared to the control group, the accumulated optical density (AOD) of GR immunoreactivity (IR) decreased significantly in the parietal cortex on postnatal day 13 (P<0.05), the AOD of GR IR decreased significantly in the parietal cortex and the temporal cortex on postnatal day 15 (P<0.05), and the AOD of GR IR decreased significantly in the parietal cortex, temporal cortex and the frontal cortex in the seizure group on postnatal day 19 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent seizures in neonatal rats result in abnormal GR expression in the cerebral cortex which might play an important role in short-term brain injury induced by early recurrent seizures.［Chin J Contemp Pediatr, 2010, 12 (1):47-50］

导出引用

王团美, 薄涛, 王曼芝, 朱晓华, 里健, 李杏芳, 毛定安. 新生大鼠反复惊厥对皮质区糖皮质激素受体表达的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2010, 12(1): 47-50

WANG Tuan-Mei, BO Tao, WANG Man-Zhi, ZHU Xiao-Hua, LI Jian, LI Xing-Fang, MAO Ding-An. Effects of neonatal recurrent seizures on glucocorticoid receptor expression in the rat brain[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2010, 12(1): 47-50

中图分类号： R-33

参考文献

［1］Ferriero DM. Neonatal brain injury［J］. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(19):1985-1995.
［2］Dammon O, Matthews SG. The effects of repeated antenatal glucocorticoid therapy in the developing brain［J］. Pediatr Res, 2001, 50(5):563-564.
［3］De Kloet ER, Oitzl MS, Joёls M. Stress and cognition: are corticosteroids good or bad guys?［J］. Trends Neurosci, 1999, 22(10): 422-426.
［4］Montilla P, Tunez I, Munoz MC, Salcedo M, Feijóo M, Munoz-Castaneda JR, et al. Effect of glucocorticoids on 3-nitropropionic acid-induced oxidative stress in synaptosomes ［J］. Eur J Pharmacol, 2004, 488(1):19-25.
［5］Holmes GL, Gairsa JL, Chevassus-Au-Louis N, Ben-Ari Y. Consequences of neonatal seizures in the rat: morphological and behavioral effects［J］. Ann Neurol, 1998, 44(6):845-857.
［6］Donley MP, Schμlkin J, Rosen JB. Glucocorticoid receptor antagonism in the basolateral amygdala and ventral hippocampus interferes with long-term memory of contextual fear［J］. Behav Brain Res, 2005, 164(2):197-205.
［7］Velísek L. Prenatal corticosteroid impact on hippocampus: implication for postnatal outcomes［J］. Epliepsy Behav, 2005, 7(1): 57-67.
［8］Han F, Ozawa H, Matsuda K, Nishi M, Kawata M. Colocafization of mineralocorticoid receptor and glucocorticoid receptor in the hippocampus and hypothalamus［J］. Neurosci Res, 2005, 51(4):371-381.
［9］Pryce CR, Feldon J, Fuchs E, Knuesel I, Oertle T, Sengstag C, et al. Postnatal ontogeny of hippocampal expression of the mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor in the common monkey［J］. Eur J Neurosci, 2005, 21(6):1521-1535.
［10］De Kloet ER, Vreugdenhil E, Oitzl MS, Joёls M. Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease ［J］. Endocr Rev, 1998, 19(3):269-301.
［11］Nishi M, Kawata M. Dynamics of glucocorticoid receptor and mineralocorticoid receptor: implications from live cell imaging studies ［J］. Neuroendocrinology, 2007, 85(3):186-192.
［12］Marini F, Pozzato C, Andreetta V, Jansson B, Arban R, Domenici E, et al. Single exposure to social defeat increases corticotropin-releasing factor and glucocorticoid receptor on RNA expression in rat hippocampus ［J］. Brain Res, 2006, 1067(1):25-35.
［13］Tamura G, Olson D, Miron J, Clark TG. Tolloid-like I is negatively regulated by stress and glucocorticoid ［J］. Brain Res Mol Brain Res, 2005, 142(2):81-90.
［14］Pofetto R, Steibel JP, Siegford JM, Zanella AP. Effects of early weaning and social isolation on the expression of glucocorticoid and mineralocoticoid receptor and 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 and 2 on mRNAs in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of piglets ［J］. Brian Res, 2006, 1067(1):36-42.
［15］Lsgor C, Kabbaj M, Akil H, Watson SJ. Delayed effects of chronic variable stress during peripubertafl-juvenile period on hippocampal morphology and on cognitive and stress axis functions in rats［J］. Hippocampus, 2004, 14(5):636-648.
［16］Yang CH, Huang CC, Hsu KS. Behavioral stress modifies hippocampal synaptic plasticity through corticosterone-induced sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase activation［J］. J Neurosci, 2004, 24(49):11029-11034.
［17］Bodnoff SR, Humphreys AG, Lehman JC, Diamond DM, Rose GM, Meaney MJ. Enduring effects of chronic corticosterone treatment on spatial learning, synaptic plasticity, and hippocampal neuropathology in young and mid-aged rats［J］. J Neurosci, 1995, 15(1):61-69.