双水平正压通气和持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中应用的比较

孔令凯; 孔祥永; 李丽华; 董建英; 商明霞; 池婧涵; 黄仁兴; 郑杨; 马俊娥; 陈晓春; 王钰; 蔡娜; 封志纯

PDF(1074 KB)

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12) : 888-892.

论著·临床研究

双水平正压通气和持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中应用的比较

孔令凯，孔祥永，李丽华，董建英，商明霞，池婧涵，黄仁兴，郑杨，马俊娥，陈晓春，王钰，蔡娜，封志纯

作者信息 +

Comparative study on application of Duo positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome

KONG Ling-Kai, KONG Xiang-Yong, LI Li-Hua, DONG Jian-Ying, SHANG Ming-Xia, CHI Jing-Han, HUANG Ren-Xing, ZHENG Yang, MA Jun-E, CHEN Xiao-Chun, WANG Yu, CAI Na, FENG Zhi-Chun

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的：对患有新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征（RDS）的早产儿早期使用双水平正压通气（DuoPAP）和经鼻持续气道正压通气（NCPAP）模式在降低有创呼吸支持率和支气管肺发育不良（BPD）发生率方面进行比较分析。方法：该试验为单中心随机对照试验，将胎龄30~35 周患有RDS生后6 h内的早产儿随机分为早期使用DuoPAP组（n=34）和早期使用 NCPAP组（n=33），若这两种方式不能维持则使用气管内插管、呼吸机辅助呼吸，肺表面活性物质作为急救药物。观察患儿生后24 h、48 h及72 h内的总插管有创呼吸支持率、支气管肺发育不良（BPD）发生率及使用无创呼吸支持后1、12、24、48、72 h 二氧化碳分压（PaCO2）、氧分压（PaO2）及氧合指数（OI）。结果：DuoPAP组48 h内、72 h内总插管有创呼吸支持率明显低于NCPAP组（P0.05）。DuoPAP组OI无创呼吸支持后1、12、24、48、72 h均高于NCPAP组（均P<0.05）。DuoPAP组PaCO2在无创呼吸支持后1、12、24 h明显小于NCPAP组（P<0.05）；DuoPAP组PaO2在无创呼吸支持后1、12 h 明显大于NCPAP组（P<0.05）。结论：早期使用DuoPAP与NCPAP相比，可明显降低RDS患儿插管有创呼吸支持率，值得推广。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early application of Duo positive airway pressure (DuoPAP), in comparison with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), can reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation and decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). METHODS: In a single-center, randomized controlled trial, preterm neonates (gestational ages 30-35 weeks) with RDS were randomly assigned to receive DuoPAP (n=34) or NCPAP (n=33) within 6 hours of birth. If the two noninvasive ventilations were not effective, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation were used, and pulmonary surfactant was administered as rescue therapy. The total invasive respiratory support rate and incidence of BPD within 24, 48 and 72 hours of birth were observed. The two groups were compared in terms of PaCO2, PaO2 and oxygenation index (OI) at 1, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after using the noninvasive respiratory support. RESULTS: The total invasive respiratory support rates within 48 and 72 hours after birth were significantly lower in the DuoPAP group than in the NCPAP group (P0.05). The OI in the DuoPAP group was significantly higher than in the NCPAP group at 1, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after noninlasive respiratory support (P<0.05). The DuoPAP group showed significantly lower PaCO2 than the NCPAP group at 1, 12, and 24 hours after noninvasive respiratory support (P<0.05). PaO2 was significantly higher in the DuoPAP group than in the NCPAP group at 1 and 12 hours after noninvasive respiratory support (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NCPAP, early application of DuoPAP can decrease the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS, showing promise for broad use.

导出引用

孔令凯，孔祥永，李丽华，董建英，商明霞，池婧涵，黄仁兴，郑杨，马俊娥，陈晓春，王钰，蔡娜，封志纯. 双水平正压通气和持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中应用的比较[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2012, 14(12): 888-892

KONG Ling-Kai, KONG Xiang-Yong, LI Li-Hua, DONG Jian-Ying, SHANG Ming-Xia, CHI Jing-Han, HUANG Ren-Xing, ZHENG Yang, MA Jun-E, CHEN Xiao-Chun, WANG Yu, CAI Na, FENG Zhi-Chun. Comparative study on application of Duo positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2012, 14(12): 888-892

中图分类号： R722.6

参考文献

［1］Verder H, Bohlin K, Kamper J, Lindwall R, Jonsson B. Nasal CPAP and surfactant for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome and prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia［J］. Acta Paediatr, 2009, 98(9): 1400-1408.

［2］Ammari A, Suri M, Milisavljevic V, Sahni R, Bateman D, Sanocka U, et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants.［J］. J Pediatr, 2005, 147(3): 341-347.

［3］Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, Herrmann D. Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial［J］. Pediatrics, 2011, 127 (2): 300-307.

［4］Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study［J］. J Pediatr, 2007, 150(5): 521-526.

［5］Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome［J］. Acta P-diatrica, 2009, 98（9）: 1412-1415.

［6］邵晓梅，叶鸿瑁，丘小汕. 实用新生儿学［M］. 第四版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2011，395-397.

［7］Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants［J］. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(14): 700-708.

［8］Pelligra G, Abdellatif MA, Lee SK. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and outcomes in preterm infants: A retrospective analysis［J］. Paediatr Child Health, 2008, 13(2): 99-103.

［9］Kumar M, Avasthi S, Ahuja S, Malik GK, Singh SN.Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation to prevent extubation failure in neonates a randomized controlled trial［J］. Indian J Pediatr, 2011, 78(7): 801-806.

［10］Ramanathan R, Sekar KC, Rasmussen M, Bhatia J, Soll RF. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treat［J］. 2012, 32(5): 336-343.

［11］Dumpa V, Katz K, Northrup V, Bhandari V. SNIPPV vs NIPPV: does synchronization matter?［J］. J Perinatol, 2012, 32(6): 438-442.

［12］Owen LS, Morley CJ, Dawson JA, Davis PG. Effects of non-synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation on spontaneous breathing in preterm infants［J］. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2011, 96(6): 422-428.

［13］Ramanathan R. Nasal respiratory support through the nares its time has come［J］. J perinatol, 2010, 30: 67-72.

［14］Abyar H, Ghafari V, Nakhshab M, Jafari M, Rahimi N, Asadpour S. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) versus nasal Continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in weaning from mechanical ventilation in preterm infants［J］. J Mazand Univ Med Sci, 2011, 84(21): 113-120.

［15］杨建生，吴本青，贺务实，燕旭东. 经鼻间歇正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察［J］.中国新生儿科杂志，2011,26(5): 315-318.

［16］高薇薇，谭三智，陈运彬，张永，王越. 鼻塞式同步间歇指令通气和持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用比较［J］. 中国当代儿科杂志,2010,12(7):524-526.

［17］Dumpa V, Northrup V, Bhandari V. Type and timing of ventilation in the first postnatal week is associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia death［J］. Am J Perinatol, 2011, 28(4): 321-330.

［18］Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, Daniele I, Cavigioli F, Rossi S, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome a randomised control trial［J］. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2010, 95(2): F85-F89.