目的：了解区域内危重新生儿转运现状及存在的问题，为建立区域内完善的新生儿转运体系提供参考。方法：选取2009年1月至2010年9月北京海淀区4所医院所有转诊新生儿为研究对象，并收集2所接诊医院的相关临床资料进行研究。结果：转诊疾病以早产儿、需外科急诊处理的疾病和呼吸系统疾病为前3位疾病（33.1%、18.3%、14.8%）。主动转诊95例（66.9%），被动转诊47例（33.1%）。转诊时年龄＜6 h者占 24.1%，6 h~者占9.3%，12 h~者占25.9%，>24 h者占40.8%。从医院乘救护车至接诊病房时间为28.0±11.1 min。转诊后死因以需外科急诊治疗的疾病占第1位，占死亡病例的53.8%。转诊时年龄<6 h组和≥6 h 组的死亡率差异无统计学意义。结论：本研究区域内4所医院以主动转运为主。需手术治疗的外科疾病患儿转诊后死亡率高，应重视新生儿外科疾病患儿的转运工作。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the application of the regional critical neonatal emergency transport system (NETS) to provide evidence for the optimization of NETS in Beijing. METHODS: All the transported neonates in four hospitals in Haidian District, Beijing, between January 2009 and September 2010 were enrolled. The relevant clinical information of two referral hospitals was analyzed. RESULTS: The top three conditions requiring transport were pre-term delivery, diseases requiring surgical treatment, and respiratory diseases, which accounted for 33.1%, 18.3%, and 14.8%, respectively. Active transport was performed in 95 cases (66.9%) and passive transport in 47 cases (33.1%). The age distribution of the neonates requiring transport was as follows: 24 hrs (40.8%). The mean time for transport from the hospital to a referral ward by ambulance was 28.0±11.1 minutes. Diseases requiring emergency surgical treatment were the leading cause of death, accounting for 53.8% of total deaths. The mortality rate was not significantly different between the neonates aged <6 hrs and ≥6 hrs groups. CONCLUSIONS: Active transport remains the main transport pattern among these four hospitals. Neonates requiring surgical treatment have a high mortality rate, and thus special attention should be paid to their transport.
关键词
区域性转运系统 /
急救 /
新生儿
Key words
Neonatal transport system /
Emergency /
Neonate
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
［1］王丹华，丁国芳，万伟琳.建立危重新生儿转运网的初步尝试［J］.实用儿科临床杂志，2003，18（12）：963-965.
［2］孔祥永，高昕，尹晓娟，洪小杨，方焕生，王自珍,等.区域性综主动型新生儿转运网络组织的应用研究［J］.中华儿科杂志，2010，48(1)：4-7.
［3］朱更娣，方礼才，王丽琴，王红华，曾惠泽. 基层医院新生儿急救转运服务模式的研究［J］.中国新生儿科杂志，2009，24(1):26-29.
［4］华子琦，徐天鹤，余加林.危重新生儿急救转运网络的实践［J］.现代医药卫生杂志，2003，19（4）：401-403.
［5］于西萍，李占魁. 转运危重新生儿457例分析［J］.中国儿童保健杂志，2008，16（4）：466-469.
［6］陈运彬，张小庄，帅春.区域性危重新生儿转运系统运作10年的远期效果随访［J］.中国妇幼保健杂志，2005，20（4）：908-910.
［7］聂川，张小庄，罗先琼，杨杰，黄水清，林少勇,等.广东省新生儿转运现状分析［J］.中国小儿急救医学，2008，3（15）：265-268.
［8］祝益民.重视和开展儿外科危重症转运［J］.临床小儿外科杂志，2008，12（7）：1-3.
［9］马继东，叶蓁蓁，黄醒华，陈焰，马丽霜，马强,等.先天性畸形围产期干预的系统化管理［J］. 临床小儿外科杂志，2009，8（4）：9-11.
［10］朱小春，俞钢，葛午平. 危重新生儿外科转运257例分析［J］.临庆小儿外科杂志，2006，5（4）：244-246.
［11］McNamara PJ, Mak W, Whyte HE. Dedicated neonatal retrieval teams improve delivery room resuscitation of outborn premature infants［J］. J Perinatol, 2005, 25(5): 309-314.
［12］叶秀祯，罗先球，张小庄. 建立区域性危重新生儿救治分中心的有效性研究［J］.国际儿科学杂志，2007，9（34）：316-319.
［13］Mullane D, Byrne H, Clarke TA, Gorman W, Griffin E, Ramesh K, et al. Neonatal transportation: the effects of a national neonatal transportation programme［J］. Ir J Med Sci, 2004, 173(2): 105-108.
［14］Kumar PP, Kumar CD, Venkatlakshmi A. Long distance neonatal transport-the need of the hour［J］. Indian Pediatr, 2008, 45(11): 920-922.
［15］Karagol BS, Zenciroglu A, Ipek MS, Kundak AA, Okumus N. Impact of land-based neonatal transport on outcomes in transient tachypnea of the newborn［J］. Am J Perinatol, 2011, 28(4): 331-336.
［16］Mori R, Fujimura M, Shiraishi J, Evans B, Corkett M, Negishi H, et al. Duration of inter-facility neonatal transport and neonatal mortality: systematic review and cohort study［J］.Pediatr Int, 2007, 49(4): 452-458.
［17］中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组.中国住院新生儿流行病学调查［J］.中国当代儿科杂志, 2009,11(1): 15-20.
PDF(938 KB)
