哮喘和咳嗽变异性哮喘儿童肺常规通气功能的比较

袁洁,安淑华,高文杰,杜雯瑾,孙军峰,张曼,姚聪卓

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 171-174.

PDF(863 KB)
PDF(863 KB)
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 171-174. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2013.03.002
论著·临床研究

哮喘和咳嗽变异性哮喘儿童肺常规通气功能的比较

  • 袁洁,安淑华,高文杰,杜雯瑾,孙军峰,张曼,姚聪卓
作者信息 +

Comparative analysis of conventional pulmonary function test results in children with asthma or cough variant asthma

  • YUAN Jie, AN Shu-Hua, GAO Wen-Jie, DU Wen-Jin, SUN Jun-Feng, ZHANG Man, YAO Cong-Zhuo
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:比较哮喘与咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)患儿肺常规通气功能的变化。方法:选择2010年 5月至2011年5月确诊为哮喘或CVA的患儿140例,分为哮喘急性发作组(发作组,50例)、哮喘缓解组(缓解组,50例)和CVA组(40例);同期正常健康体检儿童30例作为对照组。测定4组儿童用力肺活量(FVC)、一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)、最大呼气峰流速(PEF)、用力呼气25%流速(FEF25)、用力呼气50%流速(FEF50)、用力呼气75%流速(FEF75)、最大呼气中期流速(MMEF75/25)等7项肺功能指标。结果:发作组患儿各项肺功能指标如大气道指标FVC、FEV1、PEF、FEF25及小气道指标FEF50、FEF75、MMEF75/25的实际值/预计值平均水平均<80%,且以FEF50、FEF75、MMEF75/25等小气道指标下降为著。CVA组患儿小气道指标FEF75、MMEF75/25实际值/预计值的平均水平<80%。发作组各项肺常规通气功能指标均低于对照组;缓解组、CVA组FVC、FEV1、FEF25及 MMEF75/25实际值/预计值的平均水平低于对照组;发作组各项肺功能指标均明显低于缓解组和CVA组;CVA组与缓解组各项肺功能指标差异均无统计学意义。结论:哮喘急性发作期患儿存在大小气道功能障碍,以小气道功能障碍为主;CVA患儿以小气道功能轻微障碍为主,与哮喘缓解期相似。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the conventional pulmonary function test results of children with asthma or cough variant asthma (CVA). METHODS: A total of 140 children, who were diagnosed with asthma or CVA from May 2010 to May 2011, were divided into acute asthma attack (n=50), asthma remission (n=50) and CVA groups (n=40); 30 healthy children were included as a control group. The forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow after 25% of vital capacity has been expelled (FEF25), forced expiratory flow after 50% of vital capacity has been expelled (FEF50), forced expiratory flow after 75% of vital capacity has been expelled (FEF75) and maximal midexpiratory flow (MMEF75/25) were measured. RESULTS: The mean percent predicted values of all the above indices were lower than 80% in the acute asthma attack group, with FEF50, FEF75 and MMEF75/25 declining markedly; the mean percent predicted values of FEF75 and MMEF75/25 were lower than 80% in the CVA group. All the pulmonary function indices in the acute asthma attack group were lower than those in the control group. The mean percent predicted values of FVC, FEV1, FEF25 and MMEF75/25 in the asthma remission and CVA groups were lower than in the control group. All the pulmonary function indices in the acute asthma attack group were lower than in the asthma remission and CVA groups, but there were no significant differences between the asthma remission and CVA groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is small and large airway dysfunction, particularly small airway dysfunction, in children with acute asthma attack. Children with CVA present mainly with mild small airway dysfunction, as do those with asthma in remission.

关键词

肺功能 / 哮喘 / 咳嗽变异性哮喘 / 儿童

Key words

Pulmonary function / Asthma / Cough variant asthma / Child

引用本文

导出引用
袁洁,安淑华,高文杰,杜雯瑾,孙军峰,张曼,姚聪卓. 哮喘和咳嗽变异性哮喘儿童肺常规通气功能的比较[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2013, 15(3): 171-174 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2013.03.002
YUAN Jie, AN Shu-Hua, GAO Wen-Jie, DU Wen-Jin, SUN Jun-Feng, ZHANG Man, YAO Cong-Zhuo. Comparative analysis of conventional pulmonary function test results in children with asthma or cough variant asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2013, 15(3): 171-174 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2013.03.002

参考文献

[1]何权瀛. 不断提高我国慢性咳嗽的病因诊断水平[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2007, 36 (2): 5-7, 19.

[2]Fujimura M, Hara J, Myou S. Change in bronchial responsiveness and cough reflex sensitivity in patients with cough variant asthma: effect of inhaled corticosteroids[J]. Cough, 2005, 1: 5.

[3]National Institutes of Health(NIH). Global initiative for asthma (GINA): Pocket guide for asthma management and prevention in chidren[M]. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, NIH Publication, 2006: 14-16.

[4]中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组, 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 儿童支气管哮喘诊断与防治指南[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2008, 46 (10): 745-753.

[5]安淑华, 李金英, 赵清娟, 郑博娟, 王艳艳, 王宁,等. 常规肺通气功能检测在儿童支气管哮喘诊疗中的作用[J].实用儿科临床杂志, 2011, 26(4): 257-259.

[6]郑劲平. 肺通气功能障碍严重程度的分级[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2009, 32(4): 316-319.

[7]周明娟, 崔彦芹, 许银姬, 辛瑾琛, 林琳. 小呼吸道病变对慢性咳嗽儿童非典型哮喘的预测价值[J]. 实用儿科临床杂志, 2011, 26(4): 244-245.

[8]吴婕翎, 陈爱欢, 彭秋莹, 陈荣昌, 钟南山. 哮喘儿童吸入糖皮质激素疗效与白三烯水平的相关性探讨[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2009, 11(6): 441-444.

[9]Mochizuki H, Arakawa H, Tokuyama K, Mori kawa A. Bronchial sensitivity and bronchial reactivity in children with cough variant asthma[J].Chest, 2005, 128 (4): 2427-2434.

[10]Koh YY, Park Y, Jeong JH, Kim CK, Kim JT. Relationship of wheezing to airflow obstruction in asthmatic children and a history of cough-variant asthma[J]. J Asthma, 2002, 39 (4): 307-314.

[11]李如英, 钮晓青.儿童咳嗽变异性哮喘肺功能分析[J]. 临床医学工程,2011 18(8):1285-1286.

[12]吴兆海, 符州, 石田田, 张儒谊, 戴继宏. 71例咳嗽变异性哮喘患儿肺功能改变及意义[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2000, 2(4): 2930-294.


PDF(863 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/