Efficacy of volume-targeted ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
YAO Yu-Ting, SHI Yuan
Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University/National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders/Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders/Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics,Chongqing,400010,China
Abstract：Objective To study the clinical efficacy of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on the medical data of 140 neonates with severe NRDS who were admitted from September 2016 to February 2022, with 55 neonates in the VTV group and 85 in the HFOV group. The neonates in the VTV group received conventional mechanical ventilation and target tidal volume, and those in the HFOV group received HFOV. Arterial blood gas parameters were collected at 48 hours after admission, and related indices during hospitalization were recorded, including mortality rate, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, and the incidence rates of complications. Results Compared with the VTV group, the HFOV group had significantly lower incidence rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage and neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (P<0.05), and there were no significant differences between the two groups in the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, the duration of oxygen therapy, mortality rate, and the incidence rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, hypocapnia, hypercapnia, periventricular leukomalacia, and retinopathy of prematurity (P>0.05). Conclusions HFOV has a better clinical efficacy than VTV in the treatment of NRDS.
YAO Yu-Ting,SHI Yuan. Efficacy of volume-targeted ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J]. CJCP, 2022, 24(12): 1321-1325.
Crowther CA, Ashwood P, McPhee AJ, et al. Vaginal progesterone pessaries for pregnant women with a previous preterm birth to prevent neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (the PROGRESS study): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial[J]. PLoS Med, 2017, 14(9): e1002390. PMID: 28949973. PMCID: PMC5614421. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002390.
Berger TM, Fontana M, Stocker M. The journey towards lung protective respiratory support in preterm neonates[J]. Neonatology, 2013, 104(4): 265-274. PMID: 24107385. DOI: 10.1159/000354419.
Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome—2016 update[J]. Neonatology, 2017, 111(2): 107-125. PMID: 27649091. DOI: 10.1159/000448985.
van Kaam AH, Rimensberger PC, Borensztajn D, et al. Ventilation practices in the neonatal intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Pediatr, 2010, 157(5): 767-771.e3. PMID: 20619854. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.05.043.
Gupta A, Keszler M. Survey of ventilation practices in the neonatal intensive care units of the United States and Canada: use of volume-targeted ventilation and barriers to its use[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2019, 36(5): 484-489. PMID: 30189441. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669442.
Sánchez-Luna M, González-Pacheco N, Belik J, et al. New ventilator strategies: high-frequency oscillatory ventilation combined with volume guarantee[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2018, 35(6): 545-548. PMID: 29694993. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637763.
Slutsky AS, Drazen FM, Ingram RH, et al. Effective pulmonary ventilation with small-volume oscillations at high frequency[J]. Science, 1980, 209(4456): 609-671. PMID: 6771872. DOI: 10.1126/science.6771872.
Casserly B, Dennis McCool F, Sethi JM, et al. A method for determining optimal mean airway pressure in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation[J]. Lung, 2013, 191(1): 69-76. PMID: 23132266. DOI: 10.1007/s00408-012-9434-4.
