Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical and imaging features demonstrated by conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in late preterm infants with white matter damage. METHODS: A total of 519 preterm infants (277 late stage, 242 early stage) from January 2005 to May 2008 at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were enrolled. They received the MRI scans with the sequences of conventional MRI and DWI. RESULTS: In the 277 late preterm infants, 118 (42.6%) showed white matter damage, accounting for 71.9% of 164 cases of brain injury. In the 242 early preterm infants, 92 (38.0%) showed white matter damage, accounting for 69.2% of 133 cases of brain injury. There were no significant differences in the incidence of white matter damage between the late and early preterm infants. There were 61.9% (73/118) of late preterm infants with white matter damage had no obvious clinical symptoms, but 75% of infants with severe white matter damage (widespread and diffusive lesions on MRI-DWI) presented obvious clinical symptoms. Within the first week of white matter damage, DWI showed high signals, T1WI showed normal or slightly high signals, with or without high signals on T2WI. In the infants with diffuse injury, DWI showed high signals, but conventional MRI did not show obvious signal changes. CONCLUSIONS: White matter damage is common in late preterm infants. The majority of infants with severe white matter damage on MRI-DWI have obvious clinical symptoms. DWI can reflect the lesions ahead of conventional MRI.[Chin J Contemp Pediatr, 2010, 12 (5):321-326]
CHEN Dan,MAO Jian,LI Juan et al. Clinical and imaging features in late preterm infants with cerebral white matter damage[J]. CJCP, 2010, 12(05): 321-326.
[1]Hack M, Fanaroff AA.Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s[J].Semin Neonatal, 2000, 5(2):89-106.
[2]Vohr BR, Wright LL, Poole WK, McDonald SA. Neurodevelopment outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants<32 weeks gestation between 1993 and 1998[J].Pediatrics, 2005, 116(5):635-643.
[3]Robertson CM, Watt MJ, Yasui Y. Changes in the prevalence of cerebral palsy for children born very prematurely within a population-based program over 30 years[J]. JAMA, 2007, 297(24):2733-40.
[4]Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S.Births: final data for 2004[J].Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2006, 55(1):1-101.
[5]Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes Board on Health Sciences Policy. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention[M]. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2007: 17-24.
[6]Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Beckung E, Uvebrant P. Changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. VIII. Prevalence and origin in the birth year period 1991-94[J].Acta Paediatr, 2001, 90(3):271-277.
[7]MacGillivray I, Campbell DM. The changing pattern of cerebral palsy in Avon[J]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 1995, 9(2):146-155.
[8]Kinney HC, Back SA.Human oligodendroglial development: relationship to periventricular leukomalacia[J]. Semin Pediatr Neurol, 1998, 5(3):180-189.
[10]Joann R, Marie C, Maria L. Increased risk of adverse neurological development for late preterm infants[J]. J Pediatr, 2009, 154(2):169-176.
[11]Inage YW, Itoh M, Takashima S. Correlation between cerebrovascular maturity and periventricular leukomalacia[J]. Pediatr Neurol, 2000, 22(3):204-208.
[12]Marin-Padilla M. Developmental neuropathology and impact of perinatal brain damage. II:White matter lesions of the neocortex[J]. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 1997, 56(3):219-235.
[13]Marin-Padilla M. Developmental neuropathology and impact of perinatal brain damage. III:Grey matter lesions of the neocortex[J]. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 1999, 58(5):407-429.
[14]Iida K, Takashima S, Ueda K. Immunohistochemical study of myelination and oligodendrocyte in infants with periventricular leukomalacia[J]. Pediatr Neurol, 1995, 13(4):296-304.
[15]Maalouf EF, Duggan PJ, Counsell SJ, Rutherford MA, Cowan F, Azzopardi D, et al. Comparison of fingdings on cranial ultrasound and magneti resnance imaging in preterm infants[J].Pediatrics, 2001,107(4):719-727.
[16]Rademaker KJ, Uiterwaal CS, Beek FJ, van Haastert IC, Lieftink AF, Groenendaal F, et al. Neonatal cranial ultrasound versus MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome at school age in children born preterm[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2005, 90(6):489-493.
[17]Verboon-Maciolek MA, Groenendaal F, Hahn CD, Hellmann J, van Loon AM, Boivin G, et al. Human parechovirus causes encephalictis with white matter injury in neonates[J].Ann Neurol, 2008, 64(3):266-273.
[18]Sie LT, Hart AA, Van Hof J, de Groot L, Lems W, Lafeber HN, et al. Predictive value of neonatal MRI with respect to late MRI fingdings and clinical outcome. A study in infants with periventricular densities on neonatal ultrasound[J].Neuropeditrics, 2005, 36(2):78-79.
[19]Counsell SJ, Rut herford MA, Cowan Edwards AD. Magnetic resonance imaging of the preterm brain injury[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2003, 88(4):269-274.
[20]Volpe JJ. Brain injury in the preterm infant. Neuropathology, clinical aspects, pathogenesis and prevention[J].Clin Perinatal, 1997, 42(1):1-8.
[21]Miller SP, Ferriero DM, Leonard C, Piecuch R, Glidden DV, Partridqe JC, et al. Early brain injury in premature newborns detected with magnetic responance imaging is associated with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcome[J]. J Pediatr, 2005, 147(5):609-616.