
不明原因胸闷痛静息期儿童卧位与立位心电图T波及ST段振幅变化的临床意义
李云利, 王成, 李芳, 林萍, 康美华, 储卫红, 冉静, 吴礼嘉
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (9) : 771-774.
不明原因胸闷痛静息期儿童卧位与立位心电图T波及ST段振幅变化的临床意义
Clinical significance of changes in T wave and ST segment amplitudes on electrocar-diogram from supine to standing position among children with unexplained chest tightness or pain in resting stage
目的 探讨不明原因胸闷痛儿童静息期卧位与立位心电图T波及ST段振幅变化的临床意义。方法 选取以不明原因胸闷痛(静息期)为主诉的6~14岁儿童122例行直立倾斜试验(HUTT),分HUTT阳性组(n=61)和HUTT阴性组(n=61)。测量卧位与立位12导联心电图的心率及Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF、V5导联T波和ST段振幅。结果 (1)HUTT阴性组:立位较卧位心率增快(P<0.05),Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF、V5导联T波振幅降低(P<0.05);Ⅱ、aVF、V5导联ST段振幅增加(P<0.05)。(2)HUTT阳性组:立位较卧位心率增加(P<0.05),Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF、V5导联T波振幅降低(P<0.05);V5导联ST段振幅增加(P<0.05)。(3)T波振幅及ST段振幅变化:立位与卧位心电图Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF、V5导联T波及ST段振幅在HUTT阳性组、HUTT阴性组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(4)卧位与立位心电图T波和ST段振幅差比较:HUTT阳性组卧位与立位心电图Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF、V5导联T波振幅差及心率差较HUTT阴性组增加(P<0.05)。结论 不明原因胸闷痛静息期儿童HUTT阳性组卧位与立位心电图T波振幅差及心率差较HUTT阴性组增加,表明卧位与立位心电图T波振幅变化对提示自主神经功能紊乱具有临床价值。
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of changes in T wave and ST segment amplitudes on electrocardiogram (ECG) from supine to standing position in children with unexplained chest tightness or pain in resting stage. Methods A total of 122 6-14-year-old children with a chief complaint of unexplained chest tightness or pain (resting stage) underwent head-up tilt test (HUTT). According to HUTT results, these children were divided into HUTT-positive (n=61) and HUTT-negative groups (n=61). They underwent 12-lead ECG in the supine and standing positions, and heart rate and T wave and ST segment amplitudes in II, III, aVF and V5 leads were measured. Results In the HUTT-negative group, heart rates were significantly higher in the standing position than in the supine position (P<0.05), T wave amplitudes in II, III, aVF, and V5 leads were significantly lower in the standing position than in the supine position (P<0.05), and ST segment amplitudes in II, aVF and V5 leads were significantly higher in the standing position than in the supine position (P<0.05). In the HUTT-positive group, heart rates were significantly higher in the standing position than in the supine position (P<0.05), T wave amplitudes in II, III, aVF and V5 leads were significantly lower in the standing position than in the supine position (P<0.05), and ST segment amplitude in V5 lead was significantly higher in the standing position than in the supine position (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to ST segment amplitude and T wave amplitude in II, III and aVF leads of the supine or standing position (P>0.05). Compared with the HUTT-negative group, the HUTT-positive group had significantly greater T wave amplitude differences in II, III, aVF and V5 leads, and heart rate difference from supine to standing position (P<0.05). Conclusions Among the children with unexplained chest tightness or pain in resting stage, T wave amplitude differences in II, III, aVF and V5 leads and heart rate difference from supine to standing position are greater in the HUTT-positive group than in the HUTT-negative group. This suggests that the changes in T wave amplitude on ECG from supine to standing position can indicate autonomic nervous system dysfunction.
Chest tightness or pain / Electrocardiography / Head-up tilt test / Child
[1] Cava JR, Sayger PL. Chest pain in children and adolescents[J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2004, 51(6): 1553-1568.
[2] Praveen Kumar,胡春艳,王成,刘晓燕,吴礼嘉,李茗香,等.儿童不明原因胸闷和(或)胸痛与直立倾斜试验的关系[J].实用儿科临床杂志, 2009, 24(1): 24-25.
[3] Mayuqa KA, Fouad-Tarazi F. Dynamic changes in T-wave amplitude during tilt table testing: correlation with outcomes[J].Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol, 2007, 12(3): 246-250.
[4] 吴礼嘉, 王成, 胡春艳, Praveen Kumar, 许毅, 林萍, 等.血管迷走性晕厥儿童直立倾斜试验过程中心电图T波振幅对非药物治疗近期疗效的预测价值[J].中国急救医学, 2010, 30(2): 126-130.
[5] 薛小红,王成,曹闽京,林萍,李茗香,丁异熠,等.β受体功能亢进症儿童立位与卧位同步12导联心电图T波及ST段变化的意义[J].实用儿科临床杂志, 2008, 23(18): 994-996.
[6] 谢振武, 王成, 李敏, 李茗香, 曹闽京, 林萍, 等.不同年龄和性别健康人群心电图T波振幅调查[J].中华心血管病杂志, 1999, 27(2): 148.
[7] 文川,王成,李雯,吴礼嘉,许毅,林萍,等.儿童血管迷走性晕厥临床分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志, 2010, 12(9): 723-725.
[8] Thull-Freedman J. Evaluation of chest pain in the pediatric patient[J]. Med Clin North Am, 2010, 94(2): 327-347.
[9] Hanson CL, Hokanson JS. Etiology of Chest pain in children and adolescents referred to cardiology clinic[J]. WMJ, 2011, 110(2): 58-62.
[10] 楚轶龙. 儿童心悸胸闷32例心电图检查结果及临床分析[J].开封医专学报, 2000, 19(4): 42.
[11] 刘德平. 自主神经与T波改变[J].临床心电学杂志, 2006, 15(1): 8-9.
[12] 贺莉,顾晔,胡立群,成忠,曾昆.自主神经功能检测对迷走性晕厥的诊断价值[J].临床心血管病杂志, 2010, 26(5): 368-370.
[13] 杨维英,王永祥,周岩冰. 150例体位性T波改变的心电图分析[J].包头医学院学报, 2001, 17(3): 224-225.
[14] 吴礼嘉,王成.血管迷走性晕厥患者心电图改变研究进展[J].国际儿科学杂志, 2010, 37(3): 308-310.
[15] 陈华,李全忠,池慧.体位变化对QRS波形态的影响[J].实用心电学杂志, 2010, 19(4): 277-279.
[16] 薛小红,王成,林萍,曹闽京,李茗香,丁异熠,等.血管迷走性晕厥儿童在直立倾斜试验中同步十二导联心电图P波ST段及T波的动态变化[J].中国急救医学, 2010, 30(8): 689-693.
[17] 田宏,傅鸣郁,陶灵,韩璐,徐素梅,刘豫阳.血管迷走性晕厥患儿无症状期间的心率变异性分析[J].实用儿科临床杂志, 2012, 27(21): 1672-1674.
[18] Topcu B, Akalin F. The autonomic nervous system dysregulation in response to orthostatic stress in children with neurocardiogenic syncope[J]. Cardiol Young, 2010, 20(2): 165-172.
[19] Akcaboy M, Atalay S, Ucar T, Tutar E. Heart rate variability during asympomatic periods in children with recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope[J]. Turk J Pediatr, 2011, 53(1): 59-66.
“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAI03B03);湖南省自然科学基金项目(13JJ5014);湖南省医药卫生科研计划(B2013-013)。