Abstract：Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a structured institution-based teaching programme combined with family rehabilitation training in the treatment of childhood autism. Methods One hundred children with autism were divided into a combination therapy group (n=50) and a control group (n=50). The children in the control group received a structured institution-based teaching programme, and the children in the combination therapy group received a family rehabilitation training besides the structured institution-based teaching programme. Comparisons were made between the two groups by the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) score, Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) score, and Chinese version of Psychoeducational Profile (C-PEP) sore. Results After 12-months training, each dimension score and total score of ABC in the combination therapy group were all significantly lower than those in the control group (PPPConclusions As an effective treatment mode for childhood autism, structured institution-based teaching programme combined with family rehabilitation training is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
LIU Chao,LU Bin,ZHANG Yu et al. Clinical efficacy of structured institution-based teaching programme combined with family rehabilitation training in treatment of childhood autism[J]. CJCP, 2015, 17(12): 1277-1281.
Xiong N, Yang L, Yu Y, et al. Investigation of raising burden of children with autism, physical disability and mental disability in China[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2011, 32(1):306-311.
[2]
Baranek GT, Watson LR, Boyd BA, et al. Hyporesponsiveness to social and nonsocial sensory stimuli in children with autism,children with developmental delays, and typically developing children[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2013, 25(2):307-320.
[3]
Dixon MR, Carman J, Tyler PA, et al. PEAK relational training system for children with autism and developmental disabilities: Correlations with peabody picture vocabulary test and assessment reliability[J]. J Dev Physical Disabil, 2014, 26(5): 603-614.
Kim YS, Fombonne E, Koh YJ, et al. A comparison of DSM-IV pervasive developmental disorder and DSM-5 autism spectrum disorder prevalence in an epidemiologic sample[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2014, 53(5):500-508.
Magiati I, Moss J, Yates R, et al. Is the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist a useful tool for monitoring progress in children with autism spectrum disorders?[J]. J Intellect Disabil Res, 2011, 55(3):302-312.
[8]
Shek DT, Yu L. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the psycho-educational profile-3rd edition(CPEP-3)[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2014, 44(11):2832-2843.
