高频振荡通气与常频通气治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征疗效的Meta分析

乔俊英; 李远哲; 王贺义; 张帅丹

doi:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.04.014

PDF(1538 KB)

HTML

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4) : 430-435. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.04.014

论著·临床研究

高频振荡通气与常频通气治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征疗效的Meta分析

乔俊英¹, 李远哲¹, 王贺义¹, 张帅丹²

作者信息 +

A Meta analysis of the efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for treating pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome

QIAO Jun-Ying¹, LI Yuan-Zhe¹, WANG He-Yi¹, ZHANG Shuai-Dan²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的系统评价高频震荡通气（HFOV）与常频机械通气（CMV）治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征（ARDS）的疗效。方法计算机检索The Cochrane Library、PubMed、Medline、中国知网（CNKI）、万方（Wanfang Data）等数据库，收集关于HFOV与CMV比较治疗儿童ARDS的随机对照试验，检索时限从建库至2016年7月。由两位评价员按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料并对文献质量进行评价，然后采用RevMan 5.3软件将纳入的研究进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入6项试验，共246例患儿。Meta分析结果显示：HFOV和CMV两种通气方式治疗在院内病死率或30 d病死率、气压伤发生率、平均通气时间和氧合指数方面差异均无统计学意义（P > 0.05）；但相较CMV，HFOV提高了PaO₂/FiO₂比值（治疗后24 h、48 h、72 h分别提高了17%、24%、31%），改善了患儿氧合。结论与CMV相比，HFOV并没有降低ARDS患儿的病死率，但可显著改善氧合状态。最终结论尚需更多大样本、多中心、随机的临床对照研究进一步验证。

Abstract

Objective To systematically assess the clinical efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) for treating pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Data from randomized controlled trials comparing HFOV and CMV in the treatment of pediatric ARDS published before July 2016 were collected from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, CNKI, and Wanfang Data. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies were then subjected to a Meta analysis using the RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 6 studies involving 246 patients were included. The results of the Meta analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the HFOV and CMV groups in the in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate, incidence of barotrauma, mean ventilation time, and oxygenation index (P > 0.05). However, compared with CMV, HFOV increased the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio by 17%, 24%, and 31% at 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment respectively, and improved oxygenation in patients. Conclusions Although the mortality rate is not reduced by HFOV in children with ARDS, this treatment can result in significant improvement in oxygenation compared with CMV. Further large-sample, multicenter, randomized clinical trials will be required to draw a definitive conclusion.

导出引用

乔俊英, 李远哲, 王贺义, 张帅丹. 高频振荡通气与常频通气治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2017, 19(4): 430-435 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.04.014

QIAO Jun-Ying, LI Yuan-Zhe, WANG He-Yi, ZHANG Shuai-Dan. A Meta analysis of the efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for treating pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2017, 19(4): 430-435 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.04.014

参考文献

[1] 喻文亮, 陆铸今, 王莹, 等. 小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征前瞻性多中心临床流行病学研究[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2005, 14(6):448-453.
[2] 中华医学会重症医学分会. 急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2006, 18(12):706-710.
[3] Krishnan JA, Brower RG. High-frequency ventilation for acute lung injury and ARDS[J]. Chest, 2000, 118(3):795-807.
[4] Banares R, Albillos A, Rincon D, et al. Endoscopic treatment versus endoscopic plus pharmacologic treatment for acute variceal bleeding:a meta-analysis[J]. Hepatology, 2002, 35(3):609-615.
[5] Arnold JH, Hanson JH, Toro-Figuero LO, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure[J]. Crit Care Med, 1994, 22(10):1530-1539.
[6] Samransamruajkit R, Prapphal N, Deelodegenavong J, et al. Plasma soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1(sICAM-1) in pediatric ARDS during high frequency oscillatory ventilation:a predictor of mortality[J]. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 2005, 23(4):181-188.
[7] Samransamruajkit R, Rassameehirun C, Pongsanon K, et al. A comparison of clinical efficacy between high frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation with lung volume recruitment in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome:A randomized controlled trial[J]. Indian J Crit Care Med, 2016, 20(2):72-77.
[8] 耿文锦, 曹利静, 徐梅先, 等. 高频振荡机械通气治疗儿童麻疹肺炎合并重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征临床研究[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2015, 22(12):844-847.
[9] 金志鹏, 王琪, 成怡冰, 等. 高频振荡通气与常频机械通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患儿血管外肺水及临床疗效影响[J]. 中国小儿急救学, 2014, 21(5):304-306.
[10] 张群群, 马素丽, 王琪. 高频振荡通气治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察[J]. 中国实用医药, 2014, 9(29):115-116.
[11] Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome:the Berlin Definition[J]. JAMA, 2012, 307(23):2526-2533.
[12] Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS:definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical t r i a l coordination[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1994, 149(3 Pt 1):818-824.
[13] Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome:consensus recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2015, 16(5):428-439.
[14] Sud S, Sud M, Friedrich JO, et al. High frequency oscillation in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS):systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2010, 340:c2327.
[15] Pinzon AD, Rocha TS, Ricachinevsky C, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome:experience of a pediatric intensive care unit[J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras, 2013, 59(4):368-374.
[16] Li QJ, Yuan Y, Li YM, et al. Effect of high frequency oscillatory ventilation on EVLW and lung capillary permeability of piglets with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pulmonary and extrapulmonary insults[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci, 2015, 35(1):93-98.
[17] Jian MY, Koizumi T, Yokoyama T, et al. Comparison of acid-induced inflammatory responses in the rat lung during high frequency oscillatory and conventional mechanical ventilation[J]. Inflamm Res, 2010, 59(11):931-937.
[18] Weiss DJ. Cell therapies for ARDS:a promising start[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2015, 3(1):2-3.
[19] Ronchi CF, Ferreira AL, Campos FJ, et al. Interactive effects of mechanical ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide and oxidative stress in acute lung injury[J]. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2014, 190:118-123.
[20] 康文清, 孙慧清, 陈宇辉, 等. 吸入一氧化氮联合高频震荡通气治疗新生儿严重低氧血症的预后[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2013, 28(18):1402-1404.
[21] Zuo H, Zeng L, Guo G, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation combined with partial liquid ventilation in experimental lung injury:effects on lung cell apoptosis[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2015, 127(15-16):606-611.
[22] 郭光华, 王少根, 付忠华, 等. 高频振荡通气及与肺表面活性物质联用对吸入性损伤家兔肺炎性反应的影响[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2009, 25(5):363-367.
[23] Duan M, Berra L, Kumar A, et al. Use of hypothermia to allow low-tidal-volume ventilation in a patient with ARDS[J]. Respir Care, 2011, 56(12):1956-1958.
[24] Kneyber MC, Zhang H, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced lung injury. Similarity and differences between children and adults[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2014, 190(3):258-265.
[25] Smith LS, Zimmerman JJ, Martin TR. Mechanisms of acute respiratory distress syndrome in children and adults:a review and suggestions for future research[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2013, 14(6):631-643.
[26] Sud S, Sud M, Friedrich JO, et al. High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, (2):CD004085.
[27] 高志伟, 刘玲, 刘松桥, 等. 高频振荡通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2014, 94(27):2110-2114.
[28] 王海旭, 孙同文, 万有栋, 等. 高频振荡通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2015, 27(7):552-557.