足月儿与早产儿细菌性脑膜炎的临床分析

赵小林, 郭金珍, 李占魁

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10) : 1044-1048.

PDF(1476 KB)
HTML
PDF(1476 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10) : 1044-1048. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2019.10.017
论著·临床研究

足月儿与早产儿细菌性脑膜炎的临床分析

  • 赵小林, 郭金珍, 李占魁
作者信息 +

A clinical analysis of bacterial meningitis in full-term and preterm infants

  • ZHAO Xiao-Lin, GUO Jin-Zhen, LI Zhan-Kui
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨足月儿和早产儿细菌性脑膜炎的临床特征及转归特点。方法 回顾性分析102例新生儿细菌性脑膜炎患儿的临床资料,根据胎龄分为早产儿组(n=46)及足月儿组(n=56),比较两组患儿临床表现、实验室结果、影像学结果及临床转归。结果 早产儿组临床表现主要为反应差和呼吸暂停/急促(P < 0.05),足月儿组则以发热及抽搐多见(P < 0.05)。足月儿组脑脊液糖高于早产儿组(P < 0.05),早产儿组C-反应蛋白、血培养阳性率及不良预后发生率高于足月儿组(P < 0.05)。两组外周血白细胞计数、脑脊液白细胞、脑脊液蛋白及脑脊液培养阳性率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 早产儿及足月儿细菌性脑膜炎临床表现有所不同,早产儿组不良预后发生率更高。

Abstract

Objective To study the clinical features and prognosis of bacterial meningitis in full-term and preterm infants. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 102 neonates with bacterial meningitis. According to the gestational age, they were divided into a preterm group (n=46) and a full-term group (n=56). The two groups were compared in terms of clinical manifestations, laboratory markers, imaging findings, and clinical outcomes. Results Poor response and apnea were the major clinical manifestations in the preterm group (P < 0.05), while pyrexia and convulsions were more common in the full-term group (P < 0.05). The full-term group had a significantly higher glucose level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than the preterm group (P < 0.05). Compared with the full-term group, the preterm group had significantly higher C-reactive protein level, positive rate of blood culture, and incidence rate of poor prognosis (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in leukocyte count in peripheral blood, levels of leukocytes and protein in CSF, and positive rate of CSF culture (P > 0.05). Conclusions There are certain differences in the clinical manifestations between full-term and preterm infants with bacterial meningitis. Preterm infants tend to have a higher incidence rate of poor prognosis.

关键词

细菌性脑膜炎 / 临床特征 / 转归 / 足月儿 / 早产儿

Key words

Bacterial meningitis / Clinical feature / Prognosis / Full-term infant / Preterm infant

引用本文

导出引用
赵小林, 郭金珍, 李占魁. 足月儿与早产儿细菌性脑膜炎的临床分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2019, 21(10): 1044-1048 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2019.10.017
ZHAO Xiao-Lin, GUO Jin-Zhen, LI Zhan-Kui. A clinical analysis of bacterial meningitis in full-term and preterm infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2019, 21(10): 1044-1048 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2019.10.017

参考文献

[1] Edmond K, Clark A, Korczak VS, et al. Global and regional risk of disabling sequelae from bacterial meningitis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2010, 10(5):317-328.
[2] Hudson LD, Viner RM, Christie D. Long-term sequelae of childhood bacterial meningitis[J]. Curr Infect Dis Rep, 2013, 15(3):236-241.
[3] Harvey D, Holt DE, Bedford H. Bacterial meningitis in the newborn:a prospective study of mortality and morbidity[J]. Semin Perinatol, 1999, 23(3):218-225.
[4] Xu CY, Zhu HM, Wu JH, et al. Increased permeability of bloodbrain barrier is mediated by serine protease during Cryptococcus meningitis[J]. J Int Med Res, 2014, 42(1):85-92.
[5] Edwards AD, Tan S. Perinatal infections, prematurity and brain injury[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2006, 18(2):119-124.
[6] Gordon SM, Srinivasan L, Harris MC. Neonatal meningitis:overcoming challenges in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment with omics[J]. Front Pediatr, 2017, 5:139.
[7] Gaschignard J, Levy C, Bingen E, et al. Epidemiology of Escherichia coli neonatal meningitis[J]. Arch Pediatr, 2012, 19(Suppl 3):S129-S134.
[8] Ku LC, Boggess KA, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Bacterial meningitis in infants[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2015, 42(1):29-45, vii-viii.
[9] 新生儿化脓性脑膜炎研究协作组.中国北方13家医院新生儿化脓性脑膜炎临床与病原特征的多中心研究[J].中华新生儿科杂志, 2017, 32(6):415-419.
[10] 新生儿细菌性脑膜炎多中心研究协作组.华南部分地区新生儿细菌性脑膜炎多中心流行病学研究[J].中华儿科杂志, 2018, 56(6):421-428.
[11] 河北省新生儿脑膜炎研究协作组.河北省新生儿化脓性脑膜炎多中心流行病学研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(5):419-424.
[12] 殷张华,钱继红,朱天闻,等.早产儿与足月儿化脓性脑膜炎临床特征的比较研究-基于10年的临床分析[J].中华新生儿科杂志, 2017, 32(5):331-335.
[13] 韦巧珍,林宝利,苏萍,等.早产儿及足月儿化脓性脑膜炎临床特点比较分析[J].广西医科大学学报, 2016, 33(3):500-502.
[14] 邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2011:347-351.
[15] 曹云,程国强,侯新琳,等.新生儿细菌性脑膜炎病因、诊断与治疗[J].中华围产医学杂志, 2016, 19(12):881-884.
[16] Liu A, Wang C, Liang Z, et al. High-throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons characterizes bacterial composition in cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with purulent meningitis[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2015, 9:4417-4429.
[17] K?pa L, Oczko-Grzesik B, Boroń-Kaczmarska A. Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 concentration in patients with purulent, bacterial meningitis-own observations[J]. Przegl Epidemiol, 2014, 68(4):645-649.
[18] Gaschignard J, Levy C, Romain O, et al. Neonatal bacterial meningitis:444 cases in 7 years[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2011, 30(3):212-217.
[19] Gouyon JB, Vintejoux A, Sagot P, et al. Neonatal outcome associated with singleton birth at 34-41 weeks of gestation[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2010, 39(3):769-776.
[20] Tan J, Kan J, Qiu G, et al. Clinical prognosis in neonatal bacterial meningitis:the role of cerebrospinal fluid protein[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10):e0141620.

基金

陕西省卫生计生科研基金项目(2016B007);陕西省科技厅重点研发项目(2018SF-070)。


PDF(1476 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/