PDF(1308 KB)
晚期早产儿和早期足月儿1岁时神经心理发育水平的随访研究
梁晶晶, 胡艳, 邢艳菲, 林穗方, 宋燕燕
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7) : 706-710.
PDF(1308 KB)
PDF(1308 KB)
晚期早产儿和早期足月儿1岁时神经心理发育水平的随访研究
Neuropsychological development of late preterm infants and early term infants at the age of 1 year: a follow-up study
目的 探讨晚期早产儿和早期足月儿1岁时的神经心理发育水平。方法 选择矫正年龄为1岁的1 257名儿童为研究对象。根据其出生时胎龄分为4组：早期早产儿（胎龄28~33+6周）、晚期早产儿（胎龄34~36+6周）、早期足月儿（胎龄37~38+6周）及完全足月儿（胎龄39~41+6周）。采用Gesell发展量表评估其神经心理发育水平，比较各组儿童在1岁时神经心理发育状况。结果 4组儿童1岁时5大能区（适应性、大运动、精细动作、语言、个人社交）发育商的差异均有统计学意义（P < 0.05），且均表现为完全足月儿 > 早期足月儿 > 晚期早产儿 > 早期早产儿的趋势（P < 0.05）；各能区发育迟缓率也均表现为完全足月儿最低，早期早产儿最高（P < 0.05）。与完全足月儿相比，早期足月儿适应能力发育落后的风险增加（OR=1.796，P < 0.05）；晚期早产儿适应能力和精细动作发育落后的风险较高，OR值分别为2.651、2.679（P < 0.05）；早期早产儿适应能力、精细动作和个人社交能力发育落后的风险较高，OR值分别为4.069、3.710、3.515（P < 0.05）。结论 儿童1岁时神经心理发育落后的风险随出生胎龄的增加而降低，呈现剂量反应效应。早期足月儿和晚期早产儿仍然存在不同程度的发育落后，应重视早期足月儿和晚期早产儿的保健随访。
Objective To study the level of neuropsychological development in late preterm infants and early term infants at the age of 1 year. Methods A total of 1 257 children with a corrected age of 1 year were enrolled as subjects. According to gestational age at birth, they were divided into an early preterm group (28-33+6 weeks), a late preterm group (34-36+6 weeks), an early term group (37-38+6 weeks), and a full-term group (39-41+6 weeks). Gesell Developmental Schedules were used to assess the neuropsychological development of the children, and the groups were compared in terms of neuropsychological development at the age of 1 year. Results There were significant differences in the developmental quotients of the five functional areas (adaptability, gross motor, fine motor, language and social ability) between the four groups at the age of 1 year (P < 0.05), and the full-term infants had the highest development quotients, followed by the early term infants, the late preterm infants, and the early preterm infants (P < 0.05). The full-term infants had the lowest rate of developmental delay in each functional area, while the early preterm infants had the highest rate (P < 0.05). Compared with the full-term infants, the early term infants had a higher risk of developmental delay in adaptability (OR=1.796, P < 0.05), and the late preterm infants had a higher risk of developmental delay in adaptability (OR=2.651, P < 0.05) and fine motor (OR=2.679, P < 0.05), while the early preterm infants had a higher risk of developmental delay in adaptability (OR=4.069, P < 0.05), fine motor (OR=3.710, P < 0.05), and social ability (OR=3.515, P < 0.05). Conclusions The risk of neuropsychological developmental delay decreases with the increase in gestational age in children at the age of 1 year, with a dose-response effect. There are varying degrees of developmental delay in early term infants and late preterm infants, and health care follow-up for early term infants and late preterm infants should be taken seriously.
Neuropsychological development / Developmental quotient / Early term infant / Late preterm infant
[1] Fleischman AR, Oinuma M, Clark SL. Rethinking the definition of "term pregnancy"[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(1):136-139.
[2] Cheong JL, Doyle LW, Burnett AC, et al. Association between moderate and late preterm birth and neurodevelopment and social-emotional development at age 2 years[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2017, 171(4):e164805.
[3] Srinivas Jois R. Neurodevelopmental outcome of late-preterm infants:a pragmatic review[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2018, 47(11):776-781.
[4] Shah P, Kaciroti N, Richards B, et al. Developmental outcomes of late preterm infants from infancy to kindergarten[J]. Pediatrics, 2016, 138(2):e20153496.
[5] Sengupta S, Carrion V, Shelton J, et al. Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with early-term birth[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2013, 167(11):1053-1059.
[6] Chan E, Leong P, Malouf R, et al. Long-term cognitive and school outcomes of late-preterm and early-term births:a systematic review[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2016, 42(3):297-312.
[7] Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014:a systematic review and modelling analysis[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2019, 7(1):e37-e46.
[8] Murray SR, Shenkin SD, McIntosh K, et al. Long term cognitive outcomes of early term (37-38 weeks) and late preterm (34-36 weeks) births:a systematic review[J]. Wellcome Open Res, 2017, 2:101.
[9] 杨静仪, 黄赛君, 何小颖, 等. 不同胎龄早产儿实足24月龄神经心理发育状况分析[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2019, 42(2):249-252.
[10] 陈绍红, 何仕劼, 孟森玲, 等. 早产儿出院后体格发育和神经心理发育随访研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(14):3224-3226.
[11] You J, Shamsi BH, Hao MC, et al. A study on the neurodevelopment outcomes of late preterm infants[J]. BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1):108.
[12] Spong CY. Defining "term" pregnancy:recommendations from the defining "term" pregnancy workgroup[J]. JAMA, 2013, 309(23):2445-2446.
[13] Hua J, Sun J, Cao Z, et al. Differentiating the cognitive development of early-term births in infants and toddlers:a cross-sectional study in China[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(4):e025275.
[14] Konkel L. The brain before birth:using fMRI to explore the secrets of fetal neurodevelopment[J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2018, 126(11):112001.
[15] Kapellou O, Counsell SJ, Kennea N, et al. Abnormal cortical development after premature birth shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth[J]. PLoS Med, 2006, 3(8):e265.
[16] 王清清, 苏卫东, 黄育丹, 等. 晚期早产儿早期智能发育及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国新生儿科杂志, 2016, 31(1):9-13.
[17] Pannek K, Scheck SM, Colditz PB, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion tractography of the preterm infant brain:a systematic review[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2014, 56(2):113-124.
[18] 李文, 杨学梅, 代素洁, 等. 晚期早产儿远期神经心理发育的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2019, 25(22):4468-4472.
[19] Favrais G, Saliba E. Neurodevelopmental outcome of late-preterm infants:literature review[J]. Arch Pediatr, 2019, 26(8):492-496.
[20] 张梅, 钱红艳, 匡晓妮, 等. 早产儿矫正年龄1岁时神经发育特征分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2017, 19(2):147-151.
[21] 胡斌, 王成举, 常琴, 等. 不同胎龄早产儿Gesell发育量表的回顾性分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2018, 29(9):1067-1070.
[22] 李杨, 王海娜, 岳佳. 早产儿神经心理发育及干预研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(8):851-853.
广东省科技计划项目（2017A020214002）。
