Abstract:Objective To study the influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology (ART) versus twin pregnancy by spontaneous conception (SC) on neonatal outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 3 356 live twins with a gestational age of ≥24 weeks who were born in Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Hospital from 2017 to 2019, with 2 006 twins (1 003 pairs) in the ART group and 1 350 (675 pairs) in the SC group. The two groups were compared in terms of the mother's general information and pregnancy comorbidities and the general information, diseases, and outcomes of neonates. Results Compared with the SC group, the ART group had a significantly higher maternal age (P < 0.05) and significantly higher rates of primiparity, cesarean section, and cervical cerclage (P < 0.05). Compared with the SC group, the ART group had significantly higher incidence rates of maternal pregnancy comorbidities including hypertension, gestational diabetes, and postpartum hemorrhage (P < 0.05). Compared with the SC group, the ART group had a significantly lower mean gestational age of neonates (P < 0.05) and a significantly higher proportion of very-low-birth-weight infants (6.8% vs 5.8%, P < 0.05), while ART did not increase the risks of preterm birth and low Apgar score. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the mortality rate of neonates and the incidence rates of neonatal diseases including respiratory distress syndrome, stage II/III necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and grade III-IV intracranial hemorrhage (P > 0.05). Conclusions Compared with twin pregnancy by SC, twin pregnancy by ART does not increase the neonatal mortality rate and risk of adverse outcomes.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980-2009[J]. NCHS Data Brief, 2012(80):1-8.
[2]
Meyer R, Orvieto R, Israel A, et al. Outcomes of singleton versus twin pregnancies in the fifth and sixth decades[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 231:255-261.
[3]
Deltombe-Bodart S, Deruelle P, Drumez E, et al. Obstetrical and perinatal complications of twin pregnancies:is there a link with the type of infertility treatment?[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2017, 96(7):844-851.
[4]
Wang AY, Safi N, Ali F, et al. Neonatal outcomes among twins following assisted reproductive technology:an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018, 18(1):320.
Domingues AP, Dinis SR, Belo A, et al. Impact of induced pregnancies in the obstetrical outcome of twin pregnancies[J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101(1):172-177.
[8]
Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins:effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(3):330.e1-330.e15.
[9]
Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia[J]. Hum Reprod, 2010, 25(1):265-274.
[10]
Lei LL, Lan YL, Wang SY, et al. Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology:a retrospective cohort study[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2019, 132(20):2408-2416.
[11]
Pinzauti S, Ferrata C, Vannuccini S, et al. Twin pregnancies after assisted reproductive technologies:the role of maternal age on pregnancy outcome[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016, 206:198-203.
Bamberg C, Fotopoulou C, Neissner P, et al. Maternal characteristics and twin gestation outcomes over 10 years:impact of conception methods[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 98(1):95-101.
[14]
Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, et al. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies[J]. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(10):2821-2829.
[15]
Chen H, Wan Y, Xi H, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of dizygotic twin pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization versus spontaneous conception:a retrospective study[J]. Peer J, 2019, 7:e6638.
[16]
Boulet SL, Schieve LA, Nannini A, et al. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology:a population-based study[J]. Hum Reprod, 2008, 23(8):1941-1948.
[17]
Morcel K, Lavoué V, Beuchée A, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in twin pregnancies with dichorionic placentas following assisted reproductive techniques or ovarian induction alone:a comparative study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 153(2):138-142.
[18]
Smithers PR, Halliday J, Hale L, et al. High frequency of cesarean section, antepartum hemorrhage, placenta previa, and preterm delivery in in-vitro fertilization twin pregnancies[J]. Fertil Steril, 2003, 80(3):666-668.
[19]
Houlihan C, Poon LC, Ciarlo M, et al. Cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in twin gestation with short cervix:a retrospective cohort study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 48(6):752-756.
[20]
Han MN, O'donnell BE, Maykin MM, et al. The impact of cerclage in twin pregnancies on preterm birth rate before 32 weeks[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 32(13):2143-2151.
[21]
Shah JS, Nasab SH, Chappell N, et al. Neonatal outcomes among twins stratified by method of conception:secondary analysis of maternal fetal medicine (MFMU) network database[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018, 35(6):1011-1017.
[22]
Bensdorp AJ, Hukkelhoven CW, van der Veen F, et al. Dizygotic twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction and after natural conception:maternal and perinatal outcomes[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 106(2):371-377.e2.
[23]
Qin JB, Wang H, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(5):1180-1192.
[24]
Ballesta-Castillejos A, Gomez-Salgado J, Rodriguez-Almagro J, et al. Obstetric and perinatal complications associated with assisted reproductive treatment in Spain[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2019, 36(12):2435-2445.