学龄前儿童注意缺陷多动障碍决策树预测模型的前瞻性研究

doi:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2110024

摘要
图/表
参考文献(23)
相关文章 (15)
点击分布统计
下载分布统计

全文: PDF (699 KB) [HTML]
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要目的探讨注意力时间联合行为量表在学龄前儿童注意缺陷多动障碍（attention deficit hyperactivity disorder，ADHD）筛检中的应用价值。方法 ADHD组来自2019年2月至2020年3月福建省妇幼保健院确诊的学龄前ADHD儿童200例，对照组来自同期同医院或幼儿园体检的儿童200例，记录注意力时间，并使用中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表父母版（Chinese Version of Swanson Nolan and Pelham，Version Ⅳ Scale-Parent Form）评估症状。以临床诊断为金标准，应用决策树分析法，评估注意力时间联合行为量表筛查ADHD的临床应用价值。结果 ADHD组SNAP-Ⅳ条目1、4、7、8、10、11、14、15、16、18、20、21、22的得分高于对照组（P<0.05），注意力时间短于对照组（P<0.05）。将单因素分析2组间差异有统计学意义的变量作为自变量制定决策树模型，该模型预测ADHD的准确率为81%，预测非ADHD的准确率为69%，总体准确率为75%，受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.816（95%CI：0.774~0.857，P<0.001）。结论基于注意力时间和行为量表建立的学龄前儿童ADHD筛查的决策树模型准确性较高，可用于临床快速进行儿童ADHD初筛，促进开展全人口ADHD筛查与管理。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	黄欣欣
	欧萍
	钱沁芳
	黄艳
	王艳霞

关键词 ：注意缺陷多动障碍, 决策树, 快速筛查, 预测价值, 学龄前儿童

Abstract：Objective To study the clinical value of attention time combined with behavior scale in the screening of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in preschool children. Methods A total of 200 preschool children with ADHD diagnosed in Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from February 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled as the ADHD group. A total of 200 children who underwent physical examination in the hospital or kindergartens during the same period were enrolled as the control group. Attention time was recorded. Chinese Version of Swanson Nolan and Pelham, Version IV Scale-Parent Form (SNAP-IV) scale was used to evaluate symptoms. With clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the decision tree analysis was used to evaluate the clinical value of attention time combined with behavior scale in the screening of ADHD. Results Compared with the control group, the ADHD group had significantly higher scores of SNAP-IV items 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, and 22 (P<0.05) and a significantly shorter attention time (P<0.05). The variables with statistically significant differences between the two groups in univariate analysis were used as independent variables to establish a decision tree model. The accuracy of the model in predicting ADHD was 81%, that in predicting non-ADHD was 69%, and the overall accuracy was 75%, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.774-0.857, P<0.001). Conclusions The decision tree model for screening ADHD in preschool children based on attention time and assessment results of behavior scale has a high accuracy and can be used for rapid screening of ADHD among children in clinical practice.

Key words： Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Decision tree Rapid screening Predictive value Preschool child

收稿日期: 2021-10-09

基金资助:福建省卫生健康中青年骨干人才培养项目（2019-ZQN-21）；福建省自然科学基金（2016J01490）；福建省妇幼保健院内课题（16-09/16-07）。

通讯作者: 欧萍，女，主任医师。Email：eve1019@126.com。 E-mail: eve1019@126.com

作者简介: 黄欣欣，女，硕士，副主任医；

引用本文:

黄欣欣,欧萍,钱沁芳等. 学龄前儿童注意缺陷多动障碍决策树预测模型的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2022, 24(3): 255-260.

HUANG Xin-Xin,OU Ping,QIAN Qin-Fang et al. A prospective study of the decision tree prediction model for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in preschool children[J]. CJCP, 2022, 24(3): 255-260.

链接本文:

http://www.zgddek.com/CN/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2110024 或 http://www.zgddek.com/CN/Y2022/V24/I3/255

	Sharma P, Gupta RK, Banal R, et al. Prevalence and correlates of attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) risk factors among school children in a rural area of North India[J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2020, 9(1): 115-118. PMID: 32110575. PMCID: PMC7014897. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_587_19.
	Danielson ML, Visser SN, Chronis-Tuscano A, et al. A national description of treatment among United States children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder[J]. J Pediatr, 2018, 192: 240-246.e1. PMID: 29132817. PMCID: PMC5732840. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.040.
	Coghill D, Hodgkins P. Health-related quality of life of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder versus children with diabetes and healthy controls[J]. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2016, 25(3): 261-271. PMID: 26054300. PMCID: PMC4769721. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-015-0728-y.
	Fabiano GA, Schatz NK, Aloe AM. A systematic review of meta-analyses of psychosocial treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev, 2015, 18(1): 77-97. PMID: 25691358. PMCID: PMC4346344. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-015-0178-6.
	Wang TT, Liu KH, Li ZZ, et al. Prevalence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2017, 17(1): 32. PMID: 28103833. PMCID: PMC5244567. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1187-9.
	Daley D, Jones K, Hutchings J, et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in pre-school children: current findings, recommended interventions and future directions[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2009, 35(6): 754-766. PMID: 19508319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00938.x.
	Pfiffner LJ, Rooney ME, Jiang YY, et al. Sustained effects of collaborative school-home intervention for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and impairment[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2018, 57(4): 245-251. PMID: 29588050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.016.
	Posner J, Polanczyk GV, Sonuga-Barke E. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10222): 450-462. PMID: 31982036. PMCID: PMC7880081. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33004-1.
	Thomaidis L, Choleva A, Janikian M, et al. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and cognitive skills of preschool children[J]. Psychiatriki, 2017, 28(1): 28-36. PMID: 28541236. DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2017.281.28.
	10 张浩彬, 周伟珠. IBM SPSS Modeler 18.0数据挖掘权威指南[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2019.
	Gazzinelli A, Oliveira-Prado R, Matoso LF, et al. Schistosoma mansoni reinfection: analysis of risk factors by classification and regression tree (CART) modeling[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(8): e0182197. PMID: 28813451. PMCID: PMC5558968. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182197.
	Dima S, Wang KJ, Chen KH, et al. Decision tree approach to the impact of parents' oral health on dental caries experience in children: a cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(4): 692. PMID: 29642381. PMCID: PMC5923734. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040692.
	13 王斌, 冯慧芬, 王芳, 等. 基于机器学习的CatBoost模型在预测重症手足口病中的应用[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2019, 18(1): 12-16. DOI: 10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20193918.
	14 美国精神医学学会. 精神障碍诊断与统计手册[M]. 5版.张道龙, 刘春宇, 童慧琦, 等, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014: 25-29.
	15 张慧凤, 张劲松, 帅澜, 等. 学龄前儿童中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表父母版的信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016, 24(12): 1253-1256. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-12-06.
	16 陈燕惠, 卢龙杰, 林晓霞, 等. 血清皮质醇作为生物标志物在注意缺陷多动障碍诊断中的价值[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2021, 36(9): 669-673. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20200811-01331.
	17 涂梦璐, 侯婷婷, 杨福义. 国外学龄前注意缺陷多动障碍儿童研究进展[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2020(9): 53-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2020.09.009.
	Rolon-Arroyo B, Arnold DH, Harvey EA, et al. Assessing attention and disruptive behavior symptoms in preschool-age children: the utility of the diagnostic interview schedule for children[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2016, 25(1): 65-76. PMID: 27909389. PMCID: PMC5125771. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-015-0203-x.
	19 刘乐, 赵志民, 刘漪, 等. 上海市社区儿童保健医生注意缺陷多动障碍知晓率的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2013, 21(6): 636-639.
	20 许晓丽, 于冬梅, 郭齐雅, 等. 我国部分地区妇幼保健机构儿童营养保健工作现状和需求调查分析[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2015, 21(10): 80-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9577.2015.10.020.
	Cherkasova M, Sulla EM, Dalena KL, et al. Developmental course of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its predictors[J]. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2013, 22(1): 47-54. PMID: 23390433 PMCID:PMC3565715.
	Feil EG, Small JW, Seeley JR, et al. Early intervention for preschoolers at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: preschool first step to success[J]. Behav Disord, 2016, 41(2): 95-106. PMID: 29225391. PMCID: PMC5720167. DOI: 10.17988/0198-7429-41.2.95.
	23 蒋红霞. 父母行为管理策略宣教对学龄前注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的影响[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(100): 49-50. DOI: 10.16281/j.cnki.jocml.2019.a0.035.