32例儿童链球菌中毒性休克综合征药物治疗疗效分析

张海霞; 董洁; 黄娇甜; 张可圆; 卢秀兰; 赵昕; 肖昌琼

doi:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2306030

PDF(561 KB)

HTML

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9) : 971-975. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2306030

论著·临床研究

32例儿童链球菌中毒性休克综合征药物治疗疗效分析

张海霞¹, 董洁², 黄娇甜³, 张可圆⁴, 卢秀兰³, 赵昕¹, 肖昌琼⁵

作者信息 +

Drug treatment efficacy in 32 children with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome

ZHANG Hai-Xia, DONG Jie, HUANG Jiao-Tian, ZHANG Ke-Yuan, LU Xiu-Lan, ZHAO Xin, XIAO Chang-Qiong

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的分析儿童链球菌中毒性休克综合征（streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, STSS）不同药物治疗方案的疗效。方法回顾性收集2009年1月—2023年4月在湖南省儿童医院和郴州市第一人民医院经细菌培养证实为化脓性链球菌感染且符合STSS诊断标准患儿的临床资料，分析药物治疗疗效。根据药物治疗方案分为4组：标准组（含青霉素的方案）、A组（碳青霉烯类+糖肽类/利奈唑胺）、B组（碳青霉烯类、广谱抗生素、糖肽类/利奈唑胺单用或联用，但除外A组的方案）、C组（大环内酯类/未使用抗菌药物）。结果共纳入32例STSS患儿。药敏试验显示所有菌株对氨苄西林等β-内酰胺类抗菌药物和左氧氟沙星、万古霉素敏感，对克林霉素、红霉素及四环素耐药。标准组、A组、B组、C组4组间有效率的比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），其中标准组有效率最高（100%），A组、B组、C组有效率分别为40%、40%、0%。结论使用含青霉素的抗菌方案可提高儿童STSS治疗疗效。

Abstract

Objective To study the efficacy of different drug treatment regimens in children with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). Methods Clinical data of children diagnosed with STSS confirmed by bacterial culture and treated in Hunan Children's Hospital and Chenzhou First People's Hospital from January 2009 to April 2023 were retrospectively collected. The efficacy of different drug treatment regimens was analyzed. The children were divided into four groups based on the treatment regimens: standard group (regimens containing penicillin), Group A (carbapenem + glycopeptides/linezolid), Group B (carbapenems, broad-spectrum antibiotics, glycopeptides/linezolid used alone or in combination, excluding the regimens in Group A), and Group C (macrolides/not receiving antimicrobial drugs). Results A total of 32 cases of STSS were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that all strains were sensitive to beta-lactam antibiotics such as ampicillin and vancomycin, while resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline. There was a statistically significant difference in the efficacy rate among the four groups (P<0.05). The standard group exhibited the highest efficacy rate (100%), while the efficacy rates for Group A, Group B, and Group C were 40%, 40%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions The use of antimicrobial regimens containing penicillin can improve the therapeutic efficacy of STSS in children.

导出引用

张海霞, 董洁, 黄娇甜, 张可圆, 卢秀兰, 赵昕, 肖昌琼. 32例儿童链球菌中毒性休克综合征药物治疗疗效分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2023, 25(9): 971-975 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2306030

ZHANG Hai-Xia, DONG Jie, HUANG Jiao-Tian, ZHANG Ke-Yuan, LU Xiu-Lan, ZHAO Xin, XIAO Chang-Qiong. Drug treatment efficacy in 32 children with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2023, 25(9): 971-975 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2306030

参考文献

1 华春珍, 俞蕙, 杨林海, 等. 儿童化脓性链球菌致中毒性休克综合征15例[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2018, 56(8): 587-591. PMID: 30078239. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2018.08.006.
2 石武娟, 麻庆荣, 王丹. 新生儿链球菌中毒性休克综合征一例[J]. 天津医药, 2017, 45(11): 1212-1214. DOI: 10.11958/20170720.
3 肖瑞秀, 赵德业. 水痘合并链球菌中毒休克综合征一例[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志, 2004, 36(10): 882. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0951.2004.10.104.
4 连晓明. 水痘合并链球菌中毒休克综合征死亡1例诊治的教训[J]. 中国社区医师(医学专业), 2012, 14(16): 313. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2012.16.307.
5 董琳, 何时军, 张亚丽, 等. 链球菌中毒休克综合征二例[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2007, 45(4): 306-307. PMID: 17706074. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1310.2007.04.019.
6 鲁伟峰, 娄子轩, 李军, 等. 以多发性坏疽性臁疮为主要表现的链球菌相关中毒性休克综合征一例[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2021, 54(8): 729-730. DOI: 10.35541/cjd.20191048.
7 王丽杰, 袁壮, 刘春峰, 等. 链球菌中毒性休克综合征一例[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2003, 41(12): 939. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1310.2003.12.028.
8 官大威, 李如波, 杜宇, 等. 链球菌中毒性休克综合征死亡1例[J]. 中国法医学杂志, 2003, 18(6): 354-355. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5728.2003.06.018.
9 刘霜, 任晓旭, 郭琳瑛. 链球菌中毒性休克综合征合并可逆性后部性脑病综合征[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2016, 23(3): 208-210. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2016.03.017.
10 韩书珍, 俞蕙, 叶颖子, 等. 儿童链球菌中毒性休克综合征1例并文献复习[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2018, 18(6): 579-584. DOI: 10.16718/j.1009-7708.2018.06.004.
11 王龙, 陈鹭, 刘珺, 等. 儿童A族链球菌致链球菌中毒性休克综合征4例临床分析及文献回顾[J]. 北京医学, 2017, 39(10): 1032-1036. DOI: 10.15932/j.0253-9713.2017.10.013.
12 韩晓华. 链球菌感染中毒性休克综合征[J]. 小儿急救医学, 2004, 11(2): 127-129. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2004.02.033.
13 刘爱红, 孟晋华. 儿童侵袭性化脓性链球菌感染八例临床分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(5): 826-828. DOI: 10.11655/zgywylc2021.05.047.
14 马莉亚, 卢洪萍, 孙海英, 等. 儿童链球菌中毒休克综合征1例报道[J]. 浙江医学, 2017, 39(4): 304, 306. DOI: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2017.39.4.2016-926.
15 林苗苗, 何时军. 儿童链球菌中毒休克综合征临床分析[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2013, 20(6): 641-643. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2013.06.028.
16 金益梅, 何时军, 陈敏. 儿童链球菌中毒休克综合征2例临床分析及文献回顾[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2007, 25(7): 554-556. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2007.07.011.
17 金萍, 肖克林, 曹枫, 等. 儿童链球菌中毒休克综合征2例报告并文献复习[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2012, 30(11): 1031-1035. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2012.11.010.
18 许巍, 慕慧君, 李萍, 等. 儿童链球菌中毒休克综合征六例临床分析[J]. 小儿急救医学, 2004, 11(2): 105-106. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2004.02.016.
19 白海, 欧英贤. 链球菌中毒性休克综合征(附2例报告及文献复习)[J]. 中国综合临床, 2003, 19(8): 724-725. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2003.08.035.
20 叶科军. 停乳链球菌感染致新生儿败血症2例并文献复习[J]. 中国乡村医药, 2019, 26(23): 31-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5180.2019.23.019.
21 陈娟弟, 林芳, 詹雪芬. 儿童链球菌中毒休克综合征的早期认识和护理[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2007, 22(21): 1986-1988. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6975.2007.21.032.
22 汪洪姣, 华春珍, 谢永平, 等. 侵袭性化脓性链球菌感染危重症患儿的治疗决策——从1例病例引出的思考[J]. 中国抗生素杂志, 2022, 47(8): 845-848. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8689.2022.08.015.
23 沈艳华, 刘红, 齐宇洁, 等. 新生儿B族链球菌败血症的临床研究[J]. 山西医科大学学报, 2016, 47(11): 1041-1045. DOI: 10.13753/j.issn.1007-6611.2016.11.020.
24 Breiman RF, Davis JP, Facklam RR, et al. Defining the group A streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Rationale and consensus definition. The working group on severe streptococcal infections[J]. JAMA, 1993, 269(3): 390-391. PMID: 8418347.
25 Kimberlin DW, Brady MT, Jackson MA, et al. Red Book (2015): 2015 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases[M]. Champaign: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2015: 732.
26 《抗菌药物临床试验技术指导原则》写作组. 抗菌药物临床试验技术指导原则[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2014, 30(9): 844-856. DOI: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2014.09.030.
27 van Kempen EB, Bruijning-Verhagen PCJ, Borensztajn D, et al. Increase in invasive group A streptococcal infections in children in the Netherlands, a survey among 7 hospitals in 2022[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2023, 42(4): e122-e124. PMID: 36728741. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003810.
28 Dunne EM, Hutton S, Peterson E, et al. Increasing incidence of invasive group A Streptococcus disease, Idaho, USA, 2008-2019[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2022, 28(9): 1785-1795. PMID: 35997313. PMCID: PMC9423907. DOI: 10.3201/eid2809.212129.
29 卢清华, 郑跃杰, 申昆玲, 等. A族链球菌感染仍不容忽视[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2023, 38(1): 17-19. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20230111-00025.
30 禹定乐, 郑跃杰, 申昆玲, 等. 《中国儿童A族链球菌感染相关疾病的诊断、治疗与预防专家共识》解读[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2023, 38(5): 327-330. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20230109-00017.
31 胡付品, 郭燕, 朱德妹, 等. 2021年CHINET中国细菌耐药监测[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2022, 22(5): 521-530. DOI:10.16718/j.1009-7708.2022.05.001.
32 Yu D, Zheng Y, Yang Y. Is there emergence of β-lactam antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in China?[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2020, 13: 2323-2327. PMID: 32765008. PMCID: PMC7369151. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S261975.
33 戴维·吉尔伯特, 亨利·钱伯斯, 迈克尔·萨格, 等. 热病-桑福德抗微生物治疗指南（2020版）[M]. 范洪伟, 王焕玲, 周宝桐, 等译. 第50版. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2021: 69.
34 Babiker A, Kadri SS. ICU management of invasive β-hemolytic streptococcal infections[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2022, 36(4): 861-887. PMID: 36328640. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2022.07.007.