布拉氏酵母菌联合双歧杆菌四联活菌预防婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻的前瞻性随机对照研究

常煜胤, 卢太苓, 路明, 沈栋林

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8) : 935-940.

PDF(646 KB)
HTML
PDF(646 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8) : 935-940. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2506104
论著·临床研究

布拉氏酵母菌联合双歧杆菌四联活菌预防婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻的前瞻性随机对照研究

作者信息 +

Preventive effect of Saccharomyces boulardii combined with Bifidobacterium quadruple viable preparation on antibiotic-associated diarrhea in infants and young children: a prospective randomized controlled study

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨布拉氏酵母菌联合双歧杆菌四联活菌对婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻(antibiotic‑associated diarrhea, AAD)的协同预防作用,为临床优化益生菌干预方案提供依据。 方法 采用前瞻性、随机、平行对照试验设计,纳入2023年10月—2025年6月收治的需抗生素治疗的1~36月龄住院患儿,随机分为4组:对照组(不予益生菌治疗;n=59)、布拉氏酵母菌组(给予布拉氏酵母菌散;n=59)、双歧杆菌组(给予双歧杆菌四联活菌片;n=58)、联合组(联用布拉氏酵母菌散和双歧杆菌四联活菌片;n=60)。所有益生菌干预从抗生素启用持续至停药后7 d。主要结局为治疗期间AAD的发生率;次要结局包括腹泻持续时间、粪便菌群结构(16S rRNA测序)、炎症指标(粪便钙卫蛋白、血清白细胞介素‑6)及安全性。随访至益生菌停服后30 d。 结果 联合组AAD的发生率(7%)显著低于布拉氏酵母菌组(15%)、双歧杆菌组(17%)及对照组(31%)(P<0.0083)。益生菌停服后第30天,联合组Shannon指数显著高于其他3组(P<0.05);联合组粪便中双歧杆菌属、乳杆菌属的相对丰度显著高于其他3组(P<0.05),而肠球菌属的相对丰度显著低于其他3组(P<0.05)。抗生素停药后第7天,联合组炎症指标水平显著低于其他3组(P<0.05)。各组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 布拉氏酵母菌与双歧杆菌四联活菌联用较单一益生菌能更有效预防婴幼儿AAD,其机制可能与协同促进有益菌定植、加速菌群重建有关;该联合方案具有临床推广价值。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the synergistic preventive effect of Saccharomyces boulardii combined with Bifidobacterium quadruple viable preparation (BQP) on antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in infants and young children, aiming to provide evidence for optimizing probiotic intervention strategies in clinical practice. Methods A prospective, randomized, parallel controlled trial enrolled hospitalized children aged 1-36 months requiring antibiotic treatment from October 2023 to June 2025. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups: control (no probiotic; n=59), Saccharomyces boulardii (Saccharomyces boulardii powder; n=59), BQP (BQP tablets; n=58), and combined group (Saccharomyces boulardii powder plus BQP tablets; n=60). Probiotic interventions were administered from antibiotic initiation until 7 days after discontinuation. The primary outcome was the incidence of AAD during treatment. Secondary outcomes included diarrhea duration, fecal microbiota composition (16S rRNA sequencing), inflammatory markers (fecal calprotectin, serum interleukin-6), and safety. Follow-up continued until 30 days after probiotic cessation. Results The combined group showed a significantly lower AAD incidence (7%) compared to the Saccharomyces boulardii group (15%), BQP group (17%), and control group (31%) (P<0.0083). On the 30th day after probiotic cessation, the combined group demonstrated a significantly higher Shannon diversity index than the other three groups (P<0.05); relative abundances of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in feces were significantly higher in the combined group than the other three groups (P<0.05), while the relative abundances of Enterococcus weresignificantly lower than in the other three groups (P<0.05). On the 7th day after antibiotic cessation, the combined group showed significantly lower levels of inflammatory markers compared to the other three groups (P<0.05). Adverse event rates did not differ significantly among groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The combination of Saccharomyces boulardii and BQP prevents AAD in infants and young children more effectively than a single probiotic regimen, potentially through synergistic enhancement of beneficial bacterial colonization and accelerated gut microbiota restoration. This combined probiotic regimen warrants clinical promotion.

关键词

抗生素相关性腹泻 / 布拉氏酵母菌 / 双歧杆菌四联活菌 / 肠道微生态 / 随机对照试验 / 婴幼儿

Key words

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea / Saccharomyces boulardii / Bifidobacterium quadruple viable preparation / Gut microecology / Randomized controlled trial / Infant and young child

引用本文

导出引用
常煜胤, 卢太苓, 路明, . 布拉氏酵母菌联合双歧杆菌四联活菌预防婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2026, 28(8): 935-940 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2506104
Yu-Yin CHANG, Tai-Ling LU, Ming LU, et al. Preventive effect of Saccharomyces boulardii combined with Bifidobacterium quadruple viable preparation on antibiotic-associated diarrhea in infants and young children: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2026, 28(8): 935-940 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2506104

参考文献

[1]
Yang Q, Hu Z, Lei Y, et al. Overview of systematic reviews of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2023, 14: 1153070. PMCID: PMC10411537. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1153070 .
[2]
Lukasik J, Dierikx T, Besseling-van der Vaart I, et al. Multispecies probiotic for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2022, 176(9): 860-866. PMCID: PMC9214631. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1973 .
[3]
Gopalan S, Ganapathy S, Mitra M, et al. Unique properties of yeast probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745: a narrative review[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(10): e46314. PMCID: PMC10621882. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46314 .
[4]
Xu HB, Jiang RH, Sheng HB. Meta-analysis of the effects of Bifidobacterium preparations for the prevention and treatment of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea in China[J]. Complement Ther Med, 2017, 33: 105-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.07.001 .
[5]
郑跃杰, 武庆斌, 方峰, 等. 儿童抗生素相关性腹泻诊断、治疗和预防专家共识[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2021, 36(6): 424-430. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210201-00137 .
[6]
国家卫生健康委员会, 国家中医药管理局. 儿童急性感染性腹泻病诊疗规范(2020年版)[J]. 传染病信息, 2021, 34(1): 前插1-前插8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8134.2021.01.001 .
[7]
Kaya G, Usta D, Sag E, et al. Incidence and risk factors for antibiotic-associated diarrhea among hospitalized children[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2023, 42(9): 745-749. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003994 .
[8]
Guo Q, Goldenberg JZ, Humphrey C, et al. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 4(4): CD004827. PMCID: PMC6490796. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub5 .
[9]
Ramirez J, Guarner F, Bustos Fernandez L, et al. Antibiotics as major disruptors of gut microbiota[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2020, 10: 572912. PMCID: PMC7732679. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.572912 .
[10]
Waitzberg D, Guarner F, Hojsak I, et al. Can the evidence-based use of probiotics (notably Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) mitigate the clinical effects of antibiotic-associated dysbiosis?[J]. Adv Ther, 2024, 41(3): 901-914. PMCID: PMC10879266. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02783-3 .
[11]
Du X, Liu M, Li J, et al. Bifidobacterium animalis supplementation improves intestinal barrier function and alleviates antibiotic-associated diarrhea in mice[J]. Foods, 2025, 14(10): 1704. PMCID: PMC12110814. DOI: 10.3390/foods14101704 .
[12]
李想, 王晓娜. 抗生素相关腹泻新生儿应用酪酸梭菌二联活菌与拉氏酵母菌联合治疗的临床研究[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2021, 42(20): 124-128.
[13]
张苏薇, 智娴, 王梦雨, 等. 益生菌预防婴幼儿抗生素相关性腹泻的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2024, 26(10): 1108-1114. PMCID: PMC11527406. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2401129 .
[14]
O'Riordan KJ, Moloney GM, Keane L, et al. The gut microbiota-immune-brain axis: therapeutic implications[J]. Cell Rep Med, 2025, 6(3): 101982. PMCID: PMC11970326. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101982 .
[15]
Su Q, Tun HM, Liu Q, et al. Gut microbiome signatures reflect different subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Gut Microbes, 2023, 15(1): 2157697. PMCID: PMC9809927. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2157697 .
[16]
Merenstein D, Tan T, Herbin Smith K. Exploratory pilot studies to demonstrate mechanisms of preventing antibiotic-associated diarrhea and the role for probiotics[J]. Ann Fam Med, 2024, 21(): 4766. PMCID: PMC10983260. DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.4766 .
Suppl 3
[17]
Markowiak-Kopeć P, Śliżewska K. The effect of probiotics on the production of short-chain fatty acids by human intestinal microbiome[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(4): 1107. PMCID: PMC7230973. DOI: 10.3390/nu12041107 .
[18]
靳宇峰, 温炜杰, 左涛. 肠道噬菌体在人体健康和肠道微生态移植治疗中的作用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2025, 28(3): 261-265. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241130-00387 .

脚注

所有作者声明无利益冲突。


PDF(646 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/