不同出生胎龄早产儿神经发育追赶状况及校正终止年龄探讨

程旺, 王成举, 申亚丽, 吴至凤, 张雨平

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11) : 1141-1147.

PDF(714 KB)
HTML
PDF(714 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11) : 1141-1147. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2406049
论著·临床研究

不同出生胎龄早产儿神经发育追赶状况及校正终止年龄探讨

  • 程旺1,2, 王成举1, 申亚丽1, 吴至凤1, 张雨平1
作者信息 +

Neurodevelopmental catch-up status and correction termination age in preterm infants of different gestational ages

  • CHENG Wang, WANG Cheng-Ju, SHEN Ya-Li, WU Zhi-Feng, ZHANG Yu-Ping.
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨不同出生胎龄早产儿的神经发育追赶状况及校正终止年龄。 方法 回顾性收集2018年1月1日—2023年3月1日在陆军军医大学第二附属医院门诊就诊的918例无明显高危因素早产儿的Gesell发育诊断量表的发育商(developmental quotient, DQ)结果,以6 684例足月儿作为对照。按胎龄分为早产儿组(早期、中期、晚期早产儿)和足月儿组,比较实际年龄48个月内各组儿童各能区DQ的差异及变化趋势。 结果 早产儿组所有能区DQ在实际6~48月龄均呈现追赶趋势(P<0.05)。晚期早产儿组在实际36月龄时所有能区DQ与足月儿组相比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),中期、早期早产儿组在实际36月龄时多数能区DQ与足月儿组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在48月龄时所有能区DQ与足月儿组相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 早产儿的神经发育校正终止年龄也许应该持续到36月龄以后,且胎龄越小,校正所需时间越长。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the status of neurodevelopmental catch-up and suitable correction termination age in preterm infants of different gestational ages. Methods A total of 918 preterm infants without significant high-risk factors who attended the outpatient service of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 1, 2018 to March 1, 2023 were included. The data on developmental quotient (DQ) in Gesell Developmental Schedule (GDS) were collected, while 6 684 full-term infants were included as controls. According to the gestational age, the infants were divided into preterm groups (early preterm, moderate preterm, and late preterm births) and a full-term group, and these groups were compared in terms of DQ of each functional area and its changing trend with 48 months of chronological age. Results The DQ values of all functional areas showed a catch-up trend from 6 months to 48 months of chronological age in each preterm group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the DQ values of all functional areas between the late preterm and full-term groups at the chronological age of 36 months (P>0.05). There were significant differences in the DQ values of most functional areas between the moderately/early preterm groups and the full-term group at the chronological age of 36 months (P<0.05), but no significant differences were found in the DQ values of all functions areas at the chronological age of 48 months (P>0.05). Conclusions The correction termination age for neurodevelopment in preterm infants may need to extend beyond 36 months, and the smaller the gestational age, the longer the time required for correction.

关键词

神经发育 / 发育商 / 追赶 / 校正年龄 / 早产儿

Key words

Neurodevelopment / Developmental quotient / Catch-up / Corrected age / Preterm infant

引用本文

导出引用
程旺, 王成举, 申亚丽, 吴至凤, 张雨平. 不同出生胎龄早产儿神经发育追赶状况及校正终止年龄探讨[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2024, 26(11): 1141-1147 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2406049
CHENG Wang, WANG Cheng-Ju, SHEN Ya-Li, WU Zhi-Feng, ZHANG Yu-Ping.. Neurodevelopmental catch-up status and correction termination age in preterm infants of different gestational ages[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2024, 26(11): 1141-1147 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2406049

参考文献

1 Ohuma EO, Moller AB, Bradley E, et al. National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis[J]. Lancet, 2023, 402(10409): 1261-1271. PMID: 37805217. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4.
2 Aita M, De Clifford Faugère G, Lavallée A, et al. Effectiveness of interventions on early neurodevelopment of preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2021, 21(1): 210. PMID: 33926417. PMCID: PMC8082967. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02559-6.
3 Mohr GJ, Bartelme P. Mental and physical development of children prematurely born: preliminary report on mental development[J]. Am J Dis Child, 1930, 40(5): 1000-1015. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1930.01940050062007.
4 Harel-Gadassi A, Friedlander E, Yaari M, et al. Developmental assessment of preterm infants: chronological or corrected age?[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2018, 80: 35-43. PMID: 29906778. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.06.002.
5 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会, 中华医学会儿科学分会儿童保健学组. 中国儿童体格生长评价建议[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015, 53(12): 887-892. PMID: 26887541. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2015.12.003.
6 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会, 中华医学会儿科学分会儿童保健学组, 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组. 早产、低出生体重儿出院后喂养建议[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2016, 54(1): 6-12. PMID: 27470474. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.01.003.
7 杨玉凤. 儿童发育行为心理评定量表[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2023: 81.
8 van Veen S, Aarnoudse-Moens CSH, van Kaam AH, et al. Consequences of correcting intelligence quotient for prematurity at age 5 years[J]. J Pediatr, 2016, 173: 90-95. PMID: 26979649. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.043.
9 国家卫生和计划生育委员会办公厅. 早产儿保健工作规范[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2017, 20(6): 401-406. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2017.06.001.
10 Selvanathan T, Guo T, Kwan E, et al. Head circumference, total cerebral volume and neurodevelopment in preterm neonates[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2022, 107(2): 181-187. PMID: 34261769. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321397.
11 Hickey L, Burnett A, Spittle AJ, et al. Extreme prematurity, growth and neurodevelopment at 8 years: a cohort study[J]. Arch Dis Child, 2021, 106(2): 160-166. PMID: 32747376. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318139.
12 Bando N, Fenton TR, Yang J, et al. Association of postnatal growth changes and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates of <29 weeks' gestation[J]. J Pediatr, 2023, 256: 63-69.e2. PMID: 36509160. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.11.039.
13 Sammallahti S, Heinonen K, Andersson S, et al. Growth after late-preterm birth and adult cognitive, academic, and mental health outcomes[J]. Pediatr Res, 2017, 81(5): 767-774. PMID: 28056012. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2016.276.
14 朱春, 芮洪新, 张光宝, 等. 晚期早产儿矫正年龄1岁时的神经行为发育[J]. 江苏医药, 2018, 44(1): 34-36. DOI: 10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2018.01.010.
15 鲁利群, 屈艺, 母得志. 晚期早产儿出生18月龄神经发育情况[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2015, 30(5): 379-383. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2015.05.017.
16 张紫祎, 肖万祥, 马丽亚, 等. 早产儿校正18~24月龄体格生长和神经发育水平研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2023, 25(1): 25-30. PMID: 36655660. PMCID: PMC9893826. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2207113.
17 江雯, 孙宾宾, 杨玉兰, 等. 超早产儿矫正2岁以内生存质量分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1144-1148. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-1309.
18 Gould JF, Fuss BG, Roberts RM, et al. Consequences of using chronological age versus corrected age when testing cognitive and motor development in infancy and intelligence quotient at school age for children born preterm[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(9): e0256824. PMID: 34473781. PMCID: PMC8412365. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256824.
19 Lems W, Hopkins B, Samson JF. Mental and motor development in preterm infants: the issue of corrected age[J]. Early Hum Dev, 1993, 34(1-2): 113-123. PMID: 8275871. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3782(93)90046-w.
20 杨玉兰, 孙宾宾, 屈小莉, 等. 早产儿矫正24月龄内体格发育及神经心理发育随访分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1123-1127. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-1068.
21 张梅, 钱红艳, 匡晓妮, 等. 早产儿矫正年龄1岁时神经发育特征分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2017, 19(2): 147-151. PMID: 28202110. PMCID: PMC7389478. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.02.004.
22 Pisoni C, Provenzi L, Moncecchi M, et al. Early parenting intervention promotes 24-month psychomotor development in preterm children[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2021, 110(1): 101-108. PMID: 32392381. DOI: 10.1111/apa.15345.

基金

国家科技部科技创新2030-“脑科学与类脑研究”重大项目(2021ZD0201700)。

PDF(714 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/