目的 了解试管婴儿的生存质量,并探讨导致试管婴儿出生缺陷及新生儿期并发症的影响因素。方法 比较150 例采用体外受精(IVF)技术受孕的婴儿(IVF 组)与200 例自然受孕婴儿(对照组)的出生情况、母亲妊娠期疾病、出生缺陷及新生儿期并发症等指标;通过非条件logistic 回归分析对试管婴儿出生缺陷及新生儿期并发症的影响因素进行分析。结果 与对照组比较,IVF 组双胎及低出生体重儿构成比增高(P<0.01),而出生体重降低(P<0.05)。与对照组母亲相比,IVF 组母亲生产年龄偏大,剖宫产、胎膜早破及妊娠合并症发生率增高(P<0.05)。IVF 组出生缺陷发生率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与对照组相比,IVF 组低出生体重及硬肿症发生率增高(P<0.05),住院时间更长(P<0.01)。非条件logistic 回归分析显示IVF、早产、双胎及母亲妊娠合并症是导致低出生体重的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论 IVF 婴儿出生缺陷发生率与自然受孕儿无明显差异,但双胎构成比、低出生体重发生率高于自然受孕儿,住院时间更长;自然受孕、避免早产、减少双胎妊娠及预防母亲妊娠合并症可降低低出生体重的发生率。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the survival quality of infants conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and to identify the factors that cause birth defects and neonatal complications in IVF infants. Methods The study included 150 IVF infants (IVF group) and 200 naturally conceived infants (control group). Indicators such as birth situation, gestational disease, birth defects, and neonatal complications were compared between groups. The influencing factors for birth defects and neonatal complications were analyzed by non-conditional logistic regression analysis. Results Compared with the control group, the IVF group had increased incidences of twin pregnancy and low birth weight (P<0.01) but decreased average birth weight (P<0.05). In the IVF group, the mother's age was elder, with higher incidence of cesarean section, premature rupture of membranes, and pregnancy complications, as compared with the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of birth defects between the two groups (P>0.05). The IVF group had higher incidence rates of low birth weight and neonatal scleroderma (P<0.05), with a longer hospital stay (P<0.01), as compared with the control group. The non-conditional logistic regression analysis indicated that IVF, prematurity, twin pregnancy, and pregnancy complications were risk factors for low birth weight (P<0.05). Conclusions There is no significant difference in the incidence of birth defects between IVF and naturally conceived infants. However, IVF infants have higher incidences of twin pregnancy and low birth weight, with a longer hospital stay, as compared with naturally conceived infants. Natural conceiving, avoiding prematurity, twin pregnancy, and pregnancy complications will reduce the incidence of low birth weight.
关键词
体外受精 /
并发症 /
出生缺陷 /
婴儿
Key words
in vitro fertilization /
Complication /
Birth defect /
Infant
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Zollner U, Dietl J. Perinatal risks after IVF and ICSI[J]. J Perinat Med, 2013, 41(1): 17-22.
[2] Sazonova A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. Neonatal and 第17 卷第4 期 2015年4 月中国当代儿科杂志 Chin J Contemp Pediatr Vol.17 No.4 Apr. 2015 ·355· maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy[J]. Fertil and Steril, 2013, 99(3): 731- 737.
[3] 张静, 徐巍, 严超英. 试管早产儿早期并发症及治疗转归[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2013, 15(7): 569-571.
[4] Vulliemoz NR, McVeiqh E, Kurinczuk J. In vitro fertilisation: perinatal risks and early childhood outcomes[J]. Hum Fertil(Camb), 2012, 15(2): 62-68.
[5] 苟文丽, 张淑兰. 妊娠合并内科疾病[M]//乐杰, 谢幸, 林仲秋. 妇产科学. 第7 版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 92- 159.
[6] 全国妇幼卫生监测办公室. 中国妇幼卫生监测工作手册[S]. 卫生部妇幼保健与社区卫生司, 2006, 29-34.
[7] 薛辛东, 常立文, 姚笠. 新生儿与新生儿疾病[M]//沈晓明, 王卫平. 儿科学. 第7 版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 89- 140.
[8] Aboulghar M, Islam Y. Twin and preterm labor: prediction and treatment[J]. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep, 2013, 2(4): 232-239.
[9] Van Heesch MM, Evers JL, Dumoulin JC, et al. A comparison of perinatal outcomes in singletons and multiples born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection stratified for neonatal risk criteria[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2014, 93( 3): 277-286.
[10] Lehnen H, Schäfer S, Reineke T, et al. Twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously and by ART (Assisted Reproductive Technologies)-a retrospective analysis and review[J]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2011, 71(8): 669-676.
[11] Sazonova A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. Obstetric outcome after in vitro fertilization with single or double embryo transfer[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(2): 442-450.
[12] Talaulikar VS, Arulkumaran S. Reproductive outcomes after assisted conception[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2012, 67: 566-583.
[13] Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and metaanalysis[ J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2013, 19(4): 330-353.
[14] Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(19): 1803-1813.
[15] Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 97(6): 1331-1337.
[16] Moses XJ, Torres T, Rasmussen A, et al. Congenital anomalies identified at birth among infants born following assisted reproductive technology in Colorado[J]. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol, 2014, 100(2): 92-99.
[17] Talaulikar VS, Arulkumaran S. Maternal, perinatal and longterm outcomes after assisted reproductive techniques (ART): implications for clinical practice[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013, 170(1): 13-19.
[18] Fan C, Sun Y, Yang J, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies following IVF treatment: a hospital-based comparative study[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2013, 6(10): 2199-2207.