目的探讨影响学龄双生子儿童心理行为问题的因素,为减少其心理行为问题的发生提供依据。方法采用Achenbach儿童行为量表(CBCL)对内蒙古呼和浩特市147对6~12岁学龄双生子心理行为问题进行调查,运用家庭亲密度与适应性量表(FACES Ⅱ -CV)和家庭一般情况问卷了解儿童生活环境因素。结果学龄双生子心理行为问题检出率为24.1%,单项行为问题中思维问题检出率(15.3%)最高,身体不适检出率(3.4%)最低。多因素logistic回归分析显示,是否足月产对退缩行为的发生及CBCL总粗分有显著影响(P<0.05),气质类型对思维问题的发生及心理行为问题总检出率有显著影响(P<0.05),父亲生育年龄对思维问题的发生有显著影响(P<0.05),家庭亲密度对违纪行为的发生有显著影响(P<0.05),家庭适应性对思维问题的发生有显著影响(P<0.05),家庭教养方式对社会化问题的发生有显著影响(P<0.05)。结论儿童气质类型、是否足月产、父亲生育年龄、家庭亲密度、适应性及教养方式是影响学龄双生子心理行为问题的主要因素。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the influencing factors for psychological and behavioral problems in schoolage twins and to provide a basis for reducing the incidence of these problems. Methods The psychological and behavioral problems were assessed in 147 pairs of twins aged 6-12 years in Huhhot, China, using the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales and Family General Condition Questionnaire were used to collect data. Results The overall detection rate of psychological and behavioral problems in these children was 24.1%; the detection rate of thought problems (15.3%) was the highest, and the detection rate of physical discomforts (3.4%) was the lowest. According to the multiple logistic regression analysis, full-term birth or not was significantly associated with withdrawn behavior and total score on the CBCL (P<0.05); temperament type was significantly associated with thought problems and overall detection rate of psychological and behavioral problems (P<0.05); father's child-bearing age was significantly associated with thought problems (P<0.05); family cohesion was significantly associated with discipline violation (P<0.05); family adaptability was significantly associated with thought problems (P<0.05); family rearing patterns were significantly associated with socialization problems (P<0.05). Conclusions Children's temperament type, full-term birth or not, father's child-bearing age, family cohesion, family adaptability, and family rearing patterns are the main influencing factors for the psychological and behavioral problems in school-age twins.
关键词
心理行为问题 /
环境因素 /
双生子 /
学龄儿童
Key words
Psychological and behavioral problem /
Environmental factor /
Twins /
School-age child
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 李雪荣. 儿童行为与情绪障碍[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1987:1.
[2] Nikolas M, Klump KL, Burt SA. Etiological contributions to the covariation between children's perceptions of inter-parental conflict and child behavioral problems[J]. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2013, 41(2):239-251.
[3] 栾天抒. 学龄儿童心理行为影响因素的双生子研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学, 2014.
[4] 恩和巴雅尔, 李玉玲, 关宏岩, 等. DRD2基因rs1079595多态性对学龄儿童注意分散度的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(3):270-274.
[5] 朱文芬, 傅一笑, 胡小梅, 等. 遗传与环境因素对青少年危险行为影响的双生子研究[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2015, 36(7): 1007-1009.
[6] Craig E, Richard R, Robert P, et al. A twin study of competence and problem behavior in childhood and early adolescence[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1995, 36(5):775-785.
[7] 甄宏, 季成叶, 王莹. 遗传和环境因素对双生子学龄儿童行为的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2002, 23(3):248-250.
[8] 孔庆胜. 济宁市青春中前期青少年心理行为、个性特征发育的双生子研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2009.
[9] 李玉玲, 季成叶, 关宏岩, 等. 学龄儿童行为遗传双生子研究[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2012, 33(9):1033-1034.
[10] 李玉玲, 关宏岩, 恩和巴雅尔, 等. 3~7岁儿童气质遗传度双生子测评分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(1):64-67.
[11] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999.
[12] 苏林雁, 李雪荣, 万国斌, 等. Achenbach儿童行为量表的湖南常模[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1996, 4(1):24-28.
[13] 傅一笑, 蒙华庆, 李涛, 等. 儿童双生子心理健康状况的SDQ研究[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2007, 7(8):566-570.
[14] 金敏, 张岚, 杨彦春, 等. 成都市10至16岁双生子行为问题调查[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2007, 7(8):561-563.
[15] 常宪鲁, 李国海, 张燕, 等. 3~7岁学龄前儿童行为问题研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2012, 39(21):5546-5548.
[16] 杨喆, 段重阳, 刘晓秋. 小学生行为问题与家庭环境影响因素分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2013, 20(7):852-854.
[17] 叶广俊, 郭梅. 独生子女就一定有性格、行为异常吗?-独生子、非独生子及双生子儿童心理卫生问题调查[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1987, 1(1):35-37.
[18] 杨仁梅. 围生期因素对学龄前儿童心理行为影响的研究[D]. 南京:南京医科大学, 2011.
[19] 李虹. 章丘市某镇学龄前儿童气质类型特点和行为问题现状及其相互关系研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2013.
[20] 祁曙光, 安宝富, 董小惠, 等. 有无自杀行为单相抑郁症患者父母生育年龄及胎次效应的比较[J]. 中国临床康复, 2005, 9(12):22-23.
[21] 贾守梅. 学龄前儿童攻击性行为的家庭系统研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2013.
[22] 苏朝霞, 王学义, 吴书慧, 等. 儿童行为问题及其相关影响因素研究[J]. 临床荟萃, 2011, 26(6):546-549.
[23] 于凡. 家庭教养方式对儿童社会化影响的研究[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2014, 2(8):3-4.
基金
国家自然科学基金(31260265);国家自然科学基金(30960167)。
PDF(1291 KB)
