早期介入丹佛模式治疗儿童孤独症谱系障碍的初步应用

李洪华; 李春丽; 高迪; 潘秀雨; 杜琳; 贾飞勇

doi:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.002

PDF(977 KB)

HTML

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (10) : 793-798. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.002

论著·临床研究

早期介入丹佛模式治疗儿童孤独症谱系障碍的初步应用

李洪华, 李春丽, 高迪, 潘秀雨, 杜琳, 贾飞勇

作者信息 +

Preliminary application of Early Start Denver Model in children with autism spectrum disorder

LI Hong-Hua, LI Chun-Li, GAO Di, PAN Xiu-Yu, DU Lin, JIA Fei-Yong

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨早期介入丹佛模式（ESDM）对孤独症谱系障碍（ASD）患儿的治疗效果。方法选取2017年9月至2018年1月诊断为ASD的2~5岁儿童40例，随机分为常规干预组和ESDM干预组，每组各20例。对照组行常规干预治疗，试验组给予ESDM干预治疗。干预前及干预3个月后均采用异常行为量表（ABC）、儿童孤独症评定量表（CARS）、临床总体印象-病情严重程度（CGI-S）量表评估，干预3个月后行临床总体印象-改善度（CGI-I）评估。结果与干预前比较，干预3个月后常规干预组和ESDM干预组的ABC、CARS总分较前均降低（P < 0.01），其中常规干预组在ABC的社会退缩和多动2个分区分数较前降低（P < 0.01），而ESDM干预组在ABC的情绪不稳、社会退缩、多动和刻板行为4个分区分数较前降低（P < 0.01）。与常规干预组比较，ESDM干预组干预前后ABC总分差、ABC 3个分区差（情绪不稳、社会退缩、多动）及CARS总分差值更大（P < 0.05）。干预3个月后，CGI-I评分显示ESDM干预组病情改善优于常规干预组（P < 0.05）。结论常规干预及ESDM干预均可改善2~5岁ASD儿童的社会退缩、多动等异常行为，但ESDM干预较常规干预在改善ASD儿童异常行为方面效果更显著。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods Forty children aged 2-5 years who were diagnosed with ASD from September 2017 to January 2018 were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into conventional intervention group and ESDM intervention group (n=20 each). Both groups were assessed by the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale before intervention and by the ABC, CARS, CGI-S scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale after 3 months of intervention. Results After 3 months of intervention, the total scores of ABC and CARS were both significantly decreased in the two groups (P < 0.01); the scores on the social withdrawal and hyperactivity subscales of ABC were significantly decreased in the conventional intervention group (P < 0.01), and the scores on the mood swings, social withdrawal, hyperactivity, and stereotyped behavior subscales of ABC were significantly decreased in the ESDM intervention group (P < 0.01). Compared with the conventional intervention group, the ESDM intervention group had significantly greater changes in total score of ABC, scores on three subscales of ABC (mood swings, social withdrawal, and hyperactivity), and total score of CARS after intervention (P < 0.05). After 3 months of intervention, the CGI-I scoring system showed that the disease improvement was significantly better in the ESDM intervention group than in the conventional intervention group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Both conventional intervention and ESDM intervention can improve the social withdrawal and hyperactivity in children with ASD aged 2 to 5 years, but ESDM is more effective in improving the aberrant behavior of children with ASD.

导出引用

李洪华, 李春丽, 高迪, 潘秀雨, 杜琳, 贾飞勇. 早期介入丹佛模式治疗儿童孤独症谱系障碍的初步应用[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2018, 20(10): 793-798 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.002

LI Hong-Hua, LI Chun-Li, GAO Di, PAN Xiu-Yu, DU Lin, JIA Fei-Yong. Preliminary application of Early Start Denver Model in children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2018, 20(10): 793-798 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.002

参考文献

[1] Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2010 Principal Investigators; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010[J]. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2014, 63(2):1-21.
[2] 李洪华, 单玲, 杜琳, 等. 儿童孤独症谱系障碍的治疗研究进展[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2015, 17(8):886-892.
[3] 徐秀. 孤独症婴幼儿早期介入丹佛干预模式[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2015, 30(11):801-802.
[4] 徐云, 姚晶, 杨健. 早期介入丹佛模式在孤独症儿童早期干预中的应用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(1):188-191.
[5] 杨健. "早期介入丹佛模式"在孤独症儿童早期干预中的试用[D]. 杭州:浙江工业大学, 2015.
[6] Zhou B, Xu Q, Li H, et al. Effects of parent-implemented Early Start Denver Model intervention on Chinese toddlers with autism spectrum disorder:a non-randomized controlled trial[J]. Autism Res, 2018, 11(4):654-666.
[7] Colombi C, Narzisi A, Ruta L, et al. Implementation of the Early Start Denver Model in an Italian community[J]. Autism, 2018, 22(2):126-133.
[8] 张道龙, 刘春宇, 童慧琦, 等译. 孤独症谱系障碍[M]//美国精神医学学会. 精神障碍诊断与统计手册. 第5版. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2015:46-55.
[9] 马俊红, 郭延庆, 贾美香, 等. 异常行为量表中文版在儿童孤独症群体中的信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(1):14-19.
[10] Schopler E, Reichler RJ, DeVellis RF, et al. Toward objective classification of childhood autism:Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 1980, 10(1):91-103.
[11] Dunlop BW, Gray J, Rapaport MH. Transdiagnostic clinical global impression scoring for routine clinical settings[J]. Behav Sci (Basel), 2017, 7(3). pii:E40.
[12] Dawson G. Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2008, 20(3):775-803.
[13] Dawson G, Webb SJ, Wijsman E, et al. Neurocognitive and electrophysiological evidence of altered face processing in parents of children with autism:implications for a model of abnormal development of social brain circuitry in autism[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2005, 17(3):679-697.
[14] Thorup E, Nyström P, Gredebäck G, et al. Altered gaze following during live interaction in infants at risk for autism:an eye tracking study[J]. Mol Autism, 2016, 7:12.
[15] Leung RC, Pang EW, Cassel D, et al. Early neural activation during facial affect processing in adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder[J]. Neuroimage Clin, 2014, 7:203-212.
[16] Schunke O, Schöttle D, Vettorazzi E, et al. Mirror me:imitative responses in adults with autism[J]. Autism, 2016, 20(2):134-144.
[17] Dawson G, Rogers S, Munson J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism:the Early Start Denver Model[J]. Pediatrics, 2010, 125(1):e17-e23.
[18] Fulton E, Eapen V, Crn?ec R, et al. Reducing maladaptive behaviors in preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder using the early start denver model[J]. Front Pediatr, 2014, 9(2):40.
[19] Eapen V, Crn?ec R, Walter A. Clinical outcomes of an early intervention program for preschool children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in a community group setting[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2013, 13(1):3.
[20] Vivanti G, Paynter J, Duncan E, et al. Effectiveness and feasibility of the early start denver model implemented in a group-based community childcare setting[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2014, 44(12):3140-3153.
[21] Dawson G, Jones EJ, Merkle K, et al. Early behavioral intervention is associated with normalized brain activity in young children with autism[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2012, 51(11):1150-1159.
[22] Ryberg KH. Evidence for the implementation of the early start denver model for young children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc, 2015, 21(5):327-337.
[23] Rogers SJ, Estes A, Lord C, et al. Effects of a brief Early Start Denver Model (ESDM)-based parent intervention on toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders:a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2012, 51(10):1052-1065.