Multi-Test Ⅱ点刺器在儿童过敏原皮肤点刺试验中的应用评价

王亚如; 关辉; 王燕; 苗青; 向莉

doi:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.010

PDF(1101 KB)

HTML

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (10) : 835-839. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.010

论著·临床研究

Multi-Test Ⅱ点刺器在儿童过敏原皮肤点刺试验中的应用评价

王亚如, 关辉, 王燕, 苗青, 向莉

作者信息 +

Application of Multi-Test Ⅱ prick device in the skin prick test for allergens in children

WANG Ya-Ru, GUAN Hui, WANG Yan, MIAO Qing, XIANG Li

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的初步评价Multi-Test Ⅱ点刺器在儿童过敏原皮肤点刺试验（SPT）中的适用性。方法选取2017年3~9月就诊的87例过敏性疾病患儿为研究对象，均进行6种吸入性过敏原的SPT和血清特异性IgE（sIgE）测定。分别应用单点刺针及Multi-Test Ⅱ点刺器于患儿左、右前臂进行SPT的测定，应用荧光酶联免疫法进行血清sIgE浓度的测定。用视觉模拟评分（VAS）标尺评估患儿接受SPT的疼痛程度。比较3种方法6种过敏原的阳性检出率分布差异及Multi-Test Ⅱ点刺器的灵敏度和特异度。结果 Multi-Test Ⅱ法、单点刺针法、荧光酶联免疫法3种方法检出6种过敏原的阳性率比较差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。与单点刺针法比较，Multi-Test Ⅱ法灵敏度为72.7%，特异度为78.2%；与荧光酶联免疫法比较，Multi-Test Ⅱ法灵敏度为73.4%、特异度为77.5%。Multi-Test Ⅱ法较单点刺针法疼痛程度低，差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。结论 Multi-Test Ⅱ法灵敏度及特异度较高且易被患儿接受，但测定结果需同时与患儿的临床病史相结合，必要时结合血清特异性IgE测定结果。

Abstract

Objective To study the applicability of Multi-Test Ⅱ prick device in the skin prick test (SPT) for allergens in children. Methods A total of 87 children with allergic diseases who attended the hospital between March and September, 2017 were enrolled as subjects. The SPT for six inhaled allergens and serum specific IgE (sIgE) measurement were performed for all children. SPT was performed with a single-headed device on the left forearm and Multi-Test Ⅱ prick device on the right forearm. ELISA was used to measure the serum level of sIgE. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of pain during SPT. The three Methods were compared in terms of the detection rates of six allergens, and the sensitivity and specificity of Multi-Test Ⅱ prick device were analyzed. Results There were no significant differences in the detection rates of six allergens among the Multi-Test Ⅱ method, the single-headed method, and ELISA (P > 0.05). Compared with the single-headed method, the Multi-Test Ⅱ method had a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 78.2%. Compared with ELISA, the Multi-Test Ⅱ method had a sensitivity of 73.4% and a specificity of 77.5%. The Multi-Test Ⅱ method had a significantly lower degree of pain than the single-headed method (P < 0.05). Conclusions The Multi-Test Ⅱ method has high sensitivity and specificity and is easily accepted by children, but the test Results should be combined with children's medical history and serum level of sIgE when necessary.

导出引用

王亚如, 关辉, 王燕, 苗青, 向莉. Multi-Test Ⅱ点刺器在儿童过敏原皮肤点刺试验中的应用评价[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2018, 20(10): 835-839 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.010

WANG Ya-Ru, GUAN Hui, WANG Yan, MIAO Qing, XIANG Li. Application of Multi-Test Ⅱ prick device in the skin prick test for allergens in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2018, 20(10): 835-839 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.10.010

参考文献

[1] Rizzo MC, Solé D, Rizzo A, et al. Atopic disease in Brazilian children-eiologic multicentric study[J]. J Pediatr (Rio J), 1995, 71(1):31-35.
[2] Sekerel BE, Sahiner UM, Bousquet J, et al. Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens:some concerns[J]. Allergy, 2012, 67(3):442.
[3] 向莉. 过敏原检测在儿科临床应用[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2009, 24(11):840-843.
[4] Carr WW, Martin B, Howard RS, et al. Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2005, 116(2):341-346.
[5] Bernstein DI. The skin prick test:"more than meets the eye"[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2004, 92(6):587-588.
[6] Dykewicz MS, Lemmon JK, Keaney DL. Comparison of the Multi-Test Ⅱ and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2007, 98(6):559-562.
[7] Maniglia SF, Tsuru FM, Santos VC, et al. Sensitization profile to allergens in patients using Multi-Test Ⅱ[J]. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 18(4):391-397.
[8] Simons JP, Rubinstein EN, Kogut VJ, et al. Comparison of Multi-Test Ⅱ skin prick testing to intradermal dilutional testing[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004, 130(5):536-544.
[9] 中华医学会皮肤性病学分会免疫学组. 湿疹诊疗指南(2011年)[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2011, 44(1):5-6.
[10] 中华医学会皮肤性病学分会免疫学组. 中国荨麻疹诊疗指南(2014版)[J]. 中国实用乡村医生杂志, 2015, 22(17):45-47.
[11] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南(2015年, 天津)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(1):6-24.
[12] 中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组, 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 儿童支气管哮喘诊断与防治指南(2016年版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2016, 54(3):167-181.
[13] 王夕娟. 变应性鼻炎吸入物过敏原皮肤点刺试验结果分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2014, 9(13):8-10.
[14] 李雪薇. 护理评估在视觉模拟评分中的临床应用[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2016, 32(12):1912-1913.
[15] Glovsky MM. Measuring allergen-specifc IgE:where have we been and where are we going?[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2007, 378:205-219.
[16] Masse MS, Granger Vallée A, Chiriac A, et al. Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe[J]. Allergy, 2011, 66(11):1415-1419.
[17] Dykewicz MS, Dooms KT, Chassaing DL. Comparison of the Multi-Test Ⅱ and Comfor Ten allergy skin test devices[J]. Allergy Asthma Proc, 2011, 32(3):198-202.
[18] 孙劲旅, 王瑞琦, 尹佳, 等. 几种户尘螨过敏原点刺液的临床评价[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2009, 29(6):631-635.
[19] Oppenheimer J, Nelson HS. Skin testing:a survey of allergists[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2006, 96(1):19-23.
[20] Krouse JH, Sadrazodi K, Kerswill K. Sensitivity and specificity of prick and intradermal testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with timothy grass antigen[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004, 131(3):215-219.
[21] Krouse JH, Shah AG, Kerswill K. Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria[J]. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114(8):1389-1393.
[22] Nelson HS, Lahr J, Buchmeier A, et al. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1998, 101(2 Pt 1):153-156.
[23] Yoon IK, Martin BL, Carr WW. A comparison of two singleheaded and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices[J]. Allergy Asthma Proc, 2006, 27(6):473-478.
[24] Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann KC, et al. The skin prick test-European standards[J]. Clin Transl Allergy, 2013, 3(1):3.
[25] 王瑞琦, 张宏誉. CAP系统检测过敏原特异性IgE抗体的方法学评价[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2007, 25(2):109-110.
[26] Crameri R. Global atlas of allergy[M]. Zurich:European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2014:166-167.