PDF(1392 KB)
经鼻高频通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征效果的系统评价
杨玉兰, 吴本清, 苏锦珍, 杨琳, 钟桂朝, 刘兰
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (11) : 897-903.
PDF(1392 KB)
PDF(1392 KB)
经鼻高频通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征效果的系统评价
Clinical efficacy of nasal high-frequency ventilation in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a Meta analysis
目的 对经鼻高频通气（nHFV）治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征（NRDS）的治疗效果进行系统评价，为临床提供循证证据。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBase（Ovid）、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库和中文科技期刊数据库，收集nHFV对比经鼻持续正压通气（nCPAP）治疗NRDS的随机对照试验（RCT），对符合纳入标准的临床研究进行资料提取，并参考Cochrane系统评价员手册5.1.0进行质量评价，然后采用Rev Man5.3统计软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入4项RCT，合计218例患儿。Meta分析结果显示，与nCPAP组比较，nHFV组获得更有效的治疗效果（RR=1.73，95% CI：1.39~2.15，P < 0.00001）。两组患儿脑室内出血、脑室周围白质软化、支气管肺发育不良、坏死性小肠结肠炎、气胸、早产儿视网膜病等并发症的发生率无明显差异。结论 目前证据表明，与nCPAP相比，nHFV对NRDS的治疗效果更好，并无增加相关并发症的风险。
Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of nasal high-frequency ventilation (nHFV) in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBase (Ovid), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang Data, and Weipu Data to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy of nHFV and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in the treatment of NRDS. A Meta analysis was performed on the included RCTs using Rev Man 5.3 software after data extraction and quality evaluation by Cochrane 5.1.0. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 218 patients were included. The Meta analysis showed that compared with the nCPAP group, the nHFV group had a significantly better treatment outcome (RR=1.73, 95% CI:1.39-2.15, P < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, pneumothorax and retinopathy of prematurity. Conclusions Compared with nCPAP, nHFV has better clinical efficacy in the treatment of NRDS, without increasing the risk of related complications.
经鼻高频通气 / 无创高频通气 / 呼吸窘迫综合征 / Meta分析 / 新生儿
Nasal high-frequency ventilation / Noninvasive high-frequency ventilation / Respiratory distress syndrome / Meta analysis / Neonate
[1] 邵肖梅, 叶鸿瑁, 丘小汕. 实用新生儿学[M]. 第4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2015:395-398.
[2] Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O'Donnell CP, et al. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016(2):CD006405.
[3] Cools F, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015(3):CD000104.
[4] Wang J, Liu X, Zhu T, et al. Analysis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome among different gestational segments[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(9):16273-16279.
[5] Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome-2016 Update[J]. Neonatology, 2017, 111(2):107-125.
[6] 朱兴旺, 闫军, 冉琴, 等. 无创高频振荡通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的初步研究[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志, 2017, 32(4):291-294.
[7] Mukerji A, Sarmiento K, Lee B, et al. Non-invasive highfrequency ventilation versus bi-phasic continuous positive airway pressure (BP-CPAP) following CPAP failure in infants <1250 g:a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. J Perinatol, 2017, 37(1):49-53.
[8] Zhu XW, Zhao JN, Tang SF, et al. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome:a preliminary report[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2017, 52(8):1038-1042.
[9] 娄五斌, 张卫星. 经鼻无创高频振荡通气和持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征撤机后的应用比较[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(13):2037-2040.
[10] 张冰, 张卫星, 常绍鸿, 等. 鼻塞式高频振荡通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2017, 34(6):519-522.
[11] Oremus M, Wolfson C, Perrault A, et al. Interrater reliability of the modified Jadad quality scale for systematic reviews of Alzheimer's disease drug trials[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2001, 12(3):232-236.
[12] 袁菲菲, 赵行琪, 秦桂秀. 枸橼酸咖啡因与氨茶碱治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的Meta分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(20):3053-3065.
[13] Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions:explanation and elaboration[J]. BMJ, 2009, 339:b2700.
[14] 王家良, 康德英, 许能锋, 等. 循证医学[M]. 第3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2016:71-90.
[15] 蒋璐灿, 全淑燕, 李佳莲, 等. 西地那非治疗新生儿持续性肺动脉高压的系统评价[J]. 中国药房, 2017, 28(9):1211-1215.
[16] 张涛, 高薇薇, 陈佳, 等. 无创高频通气在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征撤机后的应用[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志, 2017, 32(2):96-99.
[17] Klotz D, Schneider H, Schumann S, et al. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants:a randomised controlled cross-over trial[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2018, 103(4):F1-F5.
[18] Mukerji A, Finelli M, Belik J. Nasal high-frequency oscillation for lung carbon dioxide clearance in the newborn[J]. Neonatology, 2013, 103(3):161-165.
[19] De Luca D, Carnielli VP, Conti G, et al. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs:bench evaluation of efficacy and mechanics[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010, 36(12):2094-2100.
[20] Aktas S, Unal S, Aksu M, et al. Nasal HFOV with binasal cannula appears effective and feasible in ELBW newborns[J]. J Trop Pediatr, 2016, 62(2):165-168.
[21] 刘兆娥, 余加林. 新生儿机械通气时撤机失败的临床因素[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2006, 21(1):69-70.
[22] Costa AC, Schettino Rde C, Ferreira SC. Predictors of extubation failure and reintubation in newborn infants subjected to mechanical ventilation[J]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2014, 26(1):51-56.
