不同药物方案治疗儿童双相情感障碍疗效比较及代谢指标观察

李斌, 戚艳杰, 陈云, 张之霞, 何凡, 郑毅

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12) : 1295-1299.

PDF(1290 KB)
HTML
PDF(1290 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12) : 1295-1299. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2007094
论著·临床研究

不同药物方案治疗儿童双相情感障碍疗效比较及代谢指标观察

  • 李斌, 戚艳杰, 陈云, 张之霞, 何凡, 郑毅
作者信息 +

Therapeutic effects of different drug regimens and metabolic markers in children with bipolar affective disorder: a comparative analysis

  • LI Bin, QI Yan-Jie, CHEN Yun, ZHANG Zhi-Xia, HE Fan, ZHENG Yi
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨儿童双相情感障碍经不同药物方案治疗后代谢指标的变化及治疗疗效。方法 回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年1月于该院就诊的220例儿童双相情感障碍患儿的临床资料。根据治疗方法分组,单纯采用非典型抗精神病药物治疗的112例患儿纳入对照组,采用非典型抗精神病药物联合心境稳定剂治疗的108例患儿纳入研究组。比较两组基线资料水平,治疗前后代谢指标空腹胰岛素(FIN)、糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)、总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平变化,以及代谢综合征发生情况及临床疗效。结果 两组患儿年龄、性别、病程等基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。研究组总有效率为92.6%,高于对照组(82.1%,P < 0.05)。治疗前,两组FIN、HbAlc水平比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);治疗后,对照组FIN水平高于治疗前,且高于研究组(P < 0.05);但研究组治疗前后FIN水平比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);两组治疗前后HbAlc水平比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗前,两组TC、TG、HDL-C、LDL-C水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);治疗后,对照组TC、TG水平均高于治疗前,且高于研究组(P < 0.05);但研究组治疗前后TC、TG水平比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);两组治疗前后HDL-C、LDL-C水平比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。研究组代谢综合征发生率(2.8%)低于对照组(9.8%)(P < 0.05)。结论 儿童双相情感障碍采用非经典抗精神病药物联合心境稳定剂治疗对代谢指标水平影响较小,且疗效显著。

Abstract

Objective To study the changes in metabolic markers and clinical outcome after treatment with different drug regimens in children with bipolar affective disorder. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 220 children with bipolar affective disorder who attended the hospital from January 2017 to January 2020. According to the treatment method, 112 children treated with atypical antipsychotic drugs alone were enrolled as the control group, and 108 children treated with atypical antipsychotic drugs combined with mood stabilizer were enrolled as the study group. The two groups were compared in terms of baseline data, changes in related metabolic markers[fasting insulin (FIN), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)] after treatment, incidence rate of metabolic syndrome, and clinical outcome. Results There were no significant differences in the baseline data including age, sex, and course of disease between the two groups (P > 0.05). The study group had a significantly higher overall response than the control group (92.6% vs 82.1%, P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the levels of FIN and HbAlc between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the control group had a significant increase in the level of FIN and a significantly higher level of FIN than the study group (P < 0.05). The study group showed no significant change in the level of FIN after treatment (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the level of HbAlc between the two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the levels of TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C between the two groups (P > 0.05), and after treatment, the control group had significant increases in TC and TG and significantly higher levels of TC and TG than the study group (P < 0.05). The study group showed no significant changes in TC and TG after treatment (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of HDL-C and LDL-C between the two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05). The study group had a significantly lower incidence rate of metabolic syndrome than the control group (2.8% vs 9.8%, P < 0.05). Conclusions Atypical antipsychotic drugs combined with mood stabilizer in the treatment of bipolar disorder in children have little effect on the level of metabolic markers, and the curative effect is significant.

关键词

双相情感障碍 / 药物方案 / 代谢指标 / 儿童

Key words

Bipolar affective disorder / Drug regimen / Metabolic marker / Child

引用本文

导出引用
李斌, 戚艳杰, 陈云, 张之霞, 何凡, 郑毅. 不同药物方案治疗儿童双相情感障碍疗效比较及代谢指标观察[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2020, 22(12): 1295-1299 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2007094
LI Bin, QI Yan-Jie, CHEN Yun, ZHANG Zhi-Xia, HE Fan, ZHENG Yi. Therapeutic effects of different drug regimens and metabolic markers in children with bipolar affective disorder: a comparative analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2020, 22(12): 1295-1299 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2007094

参考文献

[1] 杨超, 傅岳文, 张莉, 等. 儿童青少年双相情感障碍相关基因的生物信息学分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2018, 21(33):4098-4103.
[2] 宋光明, 李建华. 二甲双胍对氯氮平所致双相情感障碍患者代谢综合征的影响[J]. 浙江医学, 2018, 40(14):1589-1591.
[3] 中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南·精神病学分册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2006:46-47.
[4] 乐军儿, 王建林, 张敏涛. 丙戊酸钠分别与齐拉西酮和奥氮平联用治疗Ⅰ型双相情感障碍临床对比研究[J]. 中国基层医药, 2018, 25(8):1056-1058.
[5] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会代谢综合征研究协作组. 中华医学会糖尿病学分会关于代谢综合征的建议[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2004, 12(3):156-161.
[6] 向慧, 毛睿智, 赵国庆, 等. 双相障碍患者共病代谢综合征的风险及危险因素分析[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2017, 50(2):107-113.
[7] 赵宗峰, 邹韶红, 佟钙玉, 等. 单胺氧化酶A rs1137070基因多态性与儿童期受虐在维吾尔族双相障碍患者冲动攻击行为中的交互作用[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2018, 18(6):381-385.
[8] 丁玲, 肖开提·苏理旦. 喹硫平或奥氮平联合丙戊酸钠缓释片治疗维族双相障碍精神病的疗效研究[J]. 药物评价研究, 2017, 40(5):696-699.
[9] 罗俊辉, 陈艳红. 奥氮平联合丙戊酸镁缓释片治疗尿毒症脑病所致精神障碍的疗效观察[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2019, 19(4):278-281.
[10] 王钰. 丙戊酸钠联合齐拉西酮对双相情感障碍Ⅰ型患者疗效及认知功能的影响观察[J]. 四川医学, 2017, 38(10):1182-1184.
[11] 张鹏, 朱相华, 贺清. 电针治疗对非典型抗精神病药物引起代谢综合征患者代谢状态的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(32):114-117.
[12] 张娟, 赵娜. 第二代抗精神病药物治疗对精神疾病儿童体质量及代谢的影响[J]. 安徽医药, 2017, 21(11):2061-2065.
[13] 欧阳华, 王章元, 崔桂梅. 苓桂术甘汤治疗抗精神病药物所致代谢综合征疗效分析[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2017, 34(12):1085-1088.
[14] 洪二郎, 廖湘交, 常凤坤. 脑心清片对奥氮平治疗的精神分裂症患者糖脂代谢的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2017, 26(15):1686-1687.
[15] 贾杰, 王姗, 李界兴, 等. 舒肝定志汤联合二甲双胍对奥氮平所致精神分裂症患者糖脂代谢和体质量的影响[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2018, 34(4):740-743.
[16] 段侠霞, 张燕, 张盟, 等. 非典型抗精神病药对儿童青少年精神分裂症血清甲状腺激素和血脂的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(5):151-154.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1306100)。


PDF(1290 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/