Abstract OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of very or extremely low birth weight (VLBW/ELBW) infants born between 2000 and 2008 in a single NICU and the medical factors associated with the termination of treatment in some infants. METHODS: In this case control study, the clinical data of 148 VLBW/ELBW infants were retrospectively studied and the surviving infants were followed up. Both univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to investigate the medical factors associated with terminating treatment in infants. RESULTS: Twenty infants (13.5%) failed to respond to the therapy and died in the hospital. Three infants (2.0%) died after discharge. Nineteen infants (12.8%) did not receive treatment due to decision of the guardian and died. Thirty infants (20.3%) were not followed up after discharge. Seventy-six infants (51.4%) survived, including 47 healthy infants, 2 cases of congenital diseases and 27 cases with poor prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed there were 2 significant factors associated with terminating treatment: neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (P=0.030, OR=11.396, 95%CI 1.-102.701) and hospitalization periods (the year 2004-2006) (P=0.039, OR=9.869, 95%CI 1.118-87.140). CONCLUSIONS: The survival status of VLBW and ELBW infants needs to be improved. It is important to decrease the incidence of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome for decreasing the proportion of terminating treatment in the infants.
TANG Ya-Nan,WEI Ling,TANG Yan-Yan et al. A follow-up of the survival and medical factors responsible for the termination of treatment in very or extremely low birth weight infants[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2011, 13(9): 711-714.
TANG Ya-Nan,WEI Ling,TANG Yan-Yan et al. A follow-up of the survival and medical factors responsible for the termination of treatment in very or extremely low birth weight infants[J]. CJCP, 2011, 13(9): 711-714.
［4］Kusuda S, Fujimura M, Sakuma I, Aotani H, Kabe K, Itani Y, et al. Morbidity and mortality of infants with very low birth weight in Japan: center variation［J］. Pediatrics, 2006, 118(4): e1130-e1138.
［5］Koldewijn K, van Wassenaer A, Wolf MJ, Meijssen D, Houtzager B, Beelen A, et al. A neurobehavioral intervention and assessment program in very low birth weight infants: outcome at 24 months［J］. J Pediatr, 2010, 156(3):359-365.
［12］Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Weisglas-Kuperus N, van Goudoever JB, Oosterlaan J. Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children［J］. Pediatrics, 2009,124 (2):717-728.
［13］de Kieviet JF, Piek JP, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Oosterlaan J. Motor development in very preterm and very low-birth-weight children from birth to adolescence: a meta-analysis［J］. JAMA, 2009, 302(20):2235-2242.
［14］Zwicker JG, Harris SR. Quality of life of formerly preterm and very low birth weight infants from preschool age to adulthood: a systematic review［J］. Pediatrics, 2008, 121(2): e366-e376.
