危重症评分及中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值对脓毒症患儿28 d死亡风险预测的价值

邹兰兰, 刘慧慧, 张静泼, 崔晨航, 赵建闯, 乔俊英

中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3) : 316-323.

PDF(920 KB)
HTML
PDF(920 KB)
HTML
中国当代儿科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3) : 316-323. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2506053
论著·临床研究

危重症评分及中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值对脓毒症患儿28 d死亡风险预测的价值

作者信息 +

Prognostic value of critical illness scores and the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte and platelet count for predicting 28-day mortality in pediatric sepsis

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 评估儿童序贯器官衰竭评分(Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, pSOFA)、第三代小儿死亡指数评分(Pediatric Index of Mortality 3, PIM⁃3)、儿童第四代死亡风险评分(Pediatric Risk of Mortality ScoreⅣ, PRISM Ⅳ)、菲尼克斯脓毒症评分(Phoenix Sepsis Score, PSS)、菲尼克斯脓毒症评分⁃8(Phoenix Sepsis Score⁃8, Phoenix⁃8)、中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值(ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte and platelet count, N/LPR)及构建的列线图预测模型对脓毒症患儿28 d死亡的预测价值。 方法 回顾性分析2017年1月—2025年1月郑州大学第三附属医院儿科重症监护室收治的267例脓毒症患儿,分为生存组(208例)和死亡组(59例)。比较两组临床指标差异,通过单因素及多因素logistic回归筛选28 d死亡的独立危险因素并构建列线图模型,采用受试者操作特征曲线、校准曲线及决策曲线评估列线图模型的预测效能。 结果 死亡组pSOFA、PIM⁃3、PRISM Ⅳ、PSS、Phoenix⁃8评分及N/LPR、乳酸水平显著高于生存组(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析确定pSOFA、PRISM Ⅳ、PSS评分及N/LPR为脓毒症患儿28 d死亡的独立危险因素。基于这些危险因素构建的预测28 d死亡风险的列线图模型的受试者操作特征曲线下面积在训练组和验证组分别为0.940、0.911,Hosmer⁃Lemeshow检验显示拟合良好(P>0.05),决策曲线分析证实临床适用性佳。 结论 基于pSOFA、PRISM Ⅳ、PSS评分及N/LPR构建的列线图预测模型对脓毒症患儿28 d死亡风险具有良好的预测价值。

Abstract

Objective To assess the predictive value of the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA), Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM-3), Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV (PRISM IV), Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS), Phoenix Sepsis Score-8 (Phoenix-8), the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte and platelet count (N/LPR), and a nomogram constructed from these factors for 28-day mortality in children with sepsis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 267 children with sepsis admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2017 to January 2025. Patients were categorized into a survival group (n=208) and a death group (n=59). Differences in clinical indicators between the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for 28-day mortality and to construct a nomogram. Predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Results pSOFA, PIM-3, PRISM IV, PSS, Phoenix-8 scores, N/LPR, and lactate levels were significantly higher in the death group than in the survival group (P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression identified pSOFA, PRISM IV, PSS, and N/LPR as independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. The nomogram based on these factors achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.940 in the training group and 0.911 in the validation group, with good calibration according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P>0.05), and decision curve analysis indicated good clinical applicability. Conclusions A nomogram incorporating pSOFA, PRISM IV, PSS, and N/LPR shows good predictive value for 28-day mortality risk in children with sepsis.

关键词

脓毒症 / 病死率 / 菲尼克斯评分 / 列线图 / 预测模型 / 儿童

Key words

Sepsis / Mortality / Phoenix sepsis score / Nomogram / Prognostic model / Child

引用本文

导出引用
邹兰兰, 刘慧慧, 张静泼, . 危重症评分及中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值对脓毒症患儿28 d死亡风险预测的价值[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志. 2026, 28(3): 316-323 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2506053
Lan-Lan ZOU, Hui-Hui LIU, Jing-Po ZHANG, et al. Prognostic value of critical illness scores and the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte and platelet count for predicting 28-day mortality in pediatric sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2026, 28(3): 316-323 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2506053

参考文献

[1]
Cajander S, Kox M, Scicluna BP, et al. Profiling the dysregulated immune response in sepsis: overcoming challenges to achieve the goal of precision medicine[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2024, 12(4): 305-322. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00330-2 .
[2]
应佳云, 刘婷彦, 周文彬, 等. 《2024年国际共识标准: 儿童脓毒症和脓毒性休克》解读[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2024, 31(5): 322-326. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2024.05.001 .
[3]
Wojtanowski A, Hureau M, Jeanne M, et al. Heart rate variability as a marker of multiple organ dysfunction syndromes: a systematic review[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2025, 39(4): 717-729. PMCID: PMC12304018. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-025-01296-w .
[4]
Gameiro J, Fonseca JA, Jorge S, et al. Neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet ratio as a predictor of mortality in septic-acute kidney injury patients[J]. Nefrologia (Engl Ed), 2020, 40(4): 461-468. DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2019.11.006 .
[5]
Wu D, Qin H. Diagnostic and prognostic values of immunocyte ratios in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit[J]. J Infect Dev Ctries, 2023, 17(10): 1362-1372. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.17907 .
[6]
中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组, 中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组, 中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会. 儿童脓毒性休克(感染性休克)诊治专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015, 53(8): 576-580. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2015.08.007 .
[7]
Matics TJ, Sanchez-Pinto LN. Adaptation and validation of a pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score and evaluation of the sepsis-3 definitions in critically ill children[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2017, 171(10): e172352. PMCID: PMC6583375. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352 .
[8]
Straney L, Clements A, Parslow RC, et al. Paediatric index of mortality 3: an updated model for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2013, 14(7): 673-681. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31829760cf .
[9]
Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, et al. The pediatric risk of mortality score: update 2015[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2016, 17(1): 2-9. PMCID: PMC5048467. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000558 .
[10]
Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS, Sorce LR, et al. International consensus criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock[J]. JAMA, 2024, 331(8): 665-674. PMCID: PMC10900966. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.0179 .
[11]
Sanchez-Pinto LN, Bennett TD, DeWitt PE, et al. Development and validation of the phoenix criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock[J]. JAMA, 2024, 331(8): 675-686. PMCID: PMC10900964. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.0196 .
[12]
陈雪婷, 钱素云. 全球儿童脓毒症流行病学及病原学研究进展[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2019, 57(5): 380-383. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.05.014 .
[13]
姜叶洁, 冯庆红, 魁艳凤, 等. 急诊儿科改良早期预警评分对病情评估的作用[J]. 中国医药科学, 2022, 12(5): 103-105, 109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2022.05.027 .
[14]
Carter MJ, Hageman J, Feinstein Y, et al. Evaluation of Phoenix sepsis score criteria: exploratory analysis of characteristics and outcomes in an emergency transport PICU cohort from the United Kingdom, 2014-2016[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2025, 26(2): e186-e196. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003682 .
[15]
Han CH, Kim H, Park M, et al. Validation of the Phoenix criteria for sepsis and septic shock in a pediatric intensive care unit[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2025, 40(10): e106. PMCID: PMC11913626. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e106 .
[16]
王浩楠, 何颖朗, 谭睿, 等. 菲尼克斯评分体系与常用儿童脓毒症评分在传统标准下严重脓毒症患儿死亡风险预测中的比较[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2025, 41(3): 222-231. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240613-00229 .
[17]
Menon K, Schlapbach LJ, Akech S, et al. Criteria for pediatric sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the pediatric sepsis definition taskforce[J]. Crit Care Med, 2022, 50(1): 21-36. PMCID: PMC8670345. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005294 .
[18]
Watson RS, Argent AC, Sorce LR, et al. The 2024 phoenix sepsis score criteria: part 1, the evolution in definition of sepsis and septic shock[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2025, 26(2): e246-e251. PMCID: PMC11875541. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003664 .
[19]
Lanziotti VS, Ventura A, Kache S, et al. New phoenix criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock: the strengths and the future of a comprehensive perspective[J]. Crit Care Sci, 2024, 36: e20240058en. PMCID: PMC11239205. DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240058-en .
[20]
Lalitha AV, Satish JK, Reddy M, et al. Sequential organ failure assessment score as a predictor of outcome in sepsis in pediatric intensive care unit[J]. J Pediatr Intensive Care, 2021, 10(2): 110-117. PMCID: PMC8052111. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714705 .
[21]
周彬, 曾词正, 黄宇戈, 等. pSOFA评分联合C-反应蛋白、降钙素原在脓毒症患儿预后评估中的作用[J]. 临床荟萃, 2022, 37(7): 616-622. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2022.07.006 .
[22]
Zhang Z, Huang X, Wang Y, et al. Performance of three mortality prediction scores and evaluation of important determinants in eight pediatric intensive care units in China[J]. Front Pediatr, 2020, 8: 522. PMCID: PMC7505927. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00522 .
[23]
Zhang XP, Feng YX, Li Y, et al. Performance of the PRISM I, PIM2, PELOD-2 and PRISM IV scoring systems in western China: a multicenter prospective study[J]. World J Pediatr, 2022, 18(12): 818-824. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-022-00603-8 .
[24]
Niederwanger C, Varga T, Hell T, et al. Comparison of pediatric scoring systems for mortality in septic patients and the impact of missing information on their predictive power: a retrospective analysis[J]. PeerJ, 2020, 8: e9993. PMCID: PMC7543722. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9993 .
[25]
Arina P, Singer M. Pathophysiology of sepsis[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2021, 34(2): 77-84. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000963 .
[26]
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 801-810. PMCID: PMC4968574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 .
[27]
Koo CH, Eun Jung D, Park YS, et al. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts and acute kidney injury after cardiovascular surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2018, 32(1): 212-222. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.08.033 .
[28]
张浙恩, 李煜堃, 陈嘉安, 等. 中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞计数和血小板计数比值对脓毒症患者院内死亡风险的预测价值[J]. 浙江医学, 2025, 47(7): 712-716. DOI: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2025.47.7.2024-2363 .
[29]
王洪锦, 陶武, 聂诗雨, 等. 外周血中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板比值对老年脓毒症患者28天死亡的预测价值[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2024, 41(9): 606-609. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2024.09.007 .
[30]
李红, 白旭宝, 王利松, 等. N/LPR及SOFA评分对老年脓毒症患者病情及预后评估的价值[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2021, 36(6): 745-748. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697.2021.06.016 .
[31]
常晨阳, 胡绍雯, 邓国平, 等. 中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞和血小板计数比值在儿童脓毒症预后中的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(22): 2958-2963. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.22.017 .

脚注

所有作者声明无利益冲突。


版权

版权所有 © 2023中国当代儿科杂志
PDF(920 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/