Exploring predictors of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation failure in children with severe pneumonia based on propensity score matching

Sha WANG, Yu-Juan TIAN, Ling WANG, Li YAN, Lin-Yan YING

Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 571-579.

PDF(709 KB)
HTML
PDF(709 KB)
HTML
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 571-579. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2503189
CLINICAL RESEARCH

Exploring predictors of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation failure in children with severe pneumonia based on propensity score matching

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate predictors of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) failure in children with severe pneumonia using propensity score matching. Methods A retrospective case-control study included 79 children with severe pneumonia who experienced NIPPV failure at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2021 to December 2023 and 118 contemporaneous children who had successful NIPPV. Propensity score matching was used for 1∶1 matching on baseline variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of NIPPV failure, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the predictive performance of selected variables. Results After matching, 77 patients were included in each group, with no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (P>0.05). Multivariable logistic regression showed that respiratory rate (OR=1.109) and heart rate (OR=1.064) at 12-24 hours after NIPPV, Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) score before NIPPV (OR=2.809), and lung consolidation on chest imaging before NIPPV (OR=16.144) were positive predictors of NIPPV failure (all P<0.05). Pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) at 12-24 hours after NIPPV was a negative predictor of NIPPV failure (OR=0.414, P<0.05). ROC analysis showed that SpO2 at 12-24 hours after NIPPV predicted NIPPV failure with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.906, sensitivity of 70.1%, specificity of 98.7%, and an optimal cutoff of 92%. The PEWS score before NIPPV predicted NIPPV failure with an AUC of 0.784, sensitivity of 64.9%, specificity of 84.4%, and an optimal cutoff of 3.5 points. Conclusions In children with severe pneumonia receiving NIPPV, close monitoring of respiratory rate, heart rate, and SpO2 is essential, and risk stratification for treatment failure should incorporate pre-treatment chest imaging findings (consolidation area) and PEWS score.

Key words

Severe pneumonia / Propensity score matching / Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation / Predictor / Child

Cite this article

Download Citations
Sha WANG , Yu-Juan TIAN , Ling WANG , et al . Exploring predictors of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation failure in children with severe pneumonia based on propensity score matching[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2026, 28(5): 571-579 https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2503189

References

[1]
中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组, 中华儿科杂志编辑委员会, 中国医药教育协会儿科专业委员会. 儿童社区获得性肺炎管理指南(2024修订)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2024, 62(10): 920-930. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20240728-00523 .
[2]
中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组, 中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组, 中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会. 儿童无创持续气道正压通气临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2016, 54(9): 649-652. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.09.004 .
[3]
中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组, 中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组, 中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会. 儿童双水平气道正压通气临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2017, 55(5): 324-328. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.05.003 .
[4]
王新宇. 鼻罩式无创通气治疗婴幼儿重症社区获得性肺炎失败的危险因素研究[D]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2023.
[5]
方杏香, 陆丹琼, 王颖, 等. CPAP辅助治疗重症肺炎合并呼吸衰竭患儿预后影响因素分析及对策[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(23): 5522-5525. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.23.048 .
[6]
刘珺, 王荃, 钱素云, 等. 经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗5岁以下儿童社区获得性肺炎: 多中心临床研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2017, 55(5): 329-333. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.05.004 .
[7]
符跃强, 许峰. 儿童无创通气的局限性及气管插管介入时机选择[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2022, 37(2): 110-113. DOI: 10.19538/j.ek2022020607 .
[8]
曾健生, 钱素云. 规范儿童无创正压通气的临床应用[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2016, 54(9): 641-643. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.09.001 .
[9]
Langworthy B, Wu Y, Wang M. An overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered data[J]. Stat Methods Med Res, 2023, 32(4): 641-655. PMCID: PMC10119899. DOI: 10.1177/09622802221133556 .
[10]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会, 国家中医药局. 儿童社区获得性肺炎诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2019, 12(1): 6-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2019.01.002 .
[11]
曾健生, 钱素云. 无创通气在儿童呼吸衰竭中的应用: 如何把握时机[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2017, 40(9): 645-648. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2017.09.003 .
[12]
Chawla RK, Yadav V, Banerjee S, et al. Predictors of success and failure of non-invasive ventilation use in type-2 respiratory failure[J]. Indian J Tuberc, 2021, 68(1): 20-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.10.002 .
[13]
潘纯, 张伟, 夏家安, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎的无创呼吸功能支持: 适可而止[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2020, 59(9): 666-670. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20200219-00099 .
[14]
郑跃杰, 申阿东, 徐保平, 等. 儿童脉搏血氧饱和度监测临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2022, 37(23): 1761-1772. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20220831-01019 .
[15]
徐楚天, 徐向天, 张玉华, 等. 动脉氧分压与脉搏血氧饱和度相关性研究及临床应用[J]. 中国医学装备, 2019, 16(3): 83-87. DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2019.03.023 .
[16]
Emeriaud G, López-Fernández YM, Iyer NP, et al. Executive summary of the second international guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PALICC-2) [J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2023, 24(2):143-168. PMCID: PMC9848214. DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003147
[17]
王莎, 应林燕. 儿童社区获得性肺炎严重程度判断及评估方式的研究进展[J]. 现代临床医学, 2024, 50(5): 385-388. DOI: 10.11851/j.issn.1673-1557.2024.05.019 .
[18]
Skaletzky SM, Raszynski A, Totapally BR. Validation of a modified pediatric early warning system score: a retrospective case-control study[J]. Clin Pediatr (Phila), 2012, 51(5): 431-435. DOI: 10.1177/0009922811430342 .
[19]
Corfield AR, Silcock D, Clerihew L, et al. Paediatric early warning scores are predictors of adverse outcome in the pre-hospital setting: a national cohort study[J]. Resuscitation, 2018, 133: 153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.010 .
[20]
李小林. 儿童早期预警评分(PEWS)与小儿危重病例评分(PCIS)在小儿肺炎病情评估中的价值[D]. 南充: 川北医学院, 2021.
[21]
林俊宏, 谢志伟, 何春卉, 等. 儿童早期预警评分对住院呼吸系统疾病患儿病情判断的有效性[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2016, 31(16): 1235-1237. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2016.16.010 .
[22]
杨晓梅, 沈怡, 余红辉, 等. 儿童社区获得性肺炎合并肺实变临床特征分析[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2024, 26(1): 135-138. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20230303-00290 .
[23]
Urbankowska E, Krenke K, Drobczyński Ł, et al. Lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and monitoring of community acquired pneumonia in children[J]. Respir Med, 2015, 109(9): 1207-1212. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.06.011 .
[24]
Ruuskanen O, Lahti E, Jennings LC, et al. Viral pneumonia[J]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9773): 1264-1275. PMCID: PMC7138033. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61459-6 .
[25]
刘晓萍, 黄义双, 黄卫东, 等. 儿童社区获得性肺炎进展为重症肺炎的风险预测[J]. 兰州大学学报(医学版), 2022, 48(5): 67-71. DOI: 10.13885/j.issn.1000-2812.2022.05.012 .
[26]
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 507-513. PMCID: PMC7135076. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 .
[27]
Lim WS, Woodhead M, British Thoracic Society. British Thoracic Society adult community acquired pneumonia audit 2009/10[J]. Thorax, 2011, 66(6): 548-549. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200081 .
[28]
马玉兰, 卢春玉, 成芳芳, 等. 165例住院儿童甲型流感病毒肺炎及混合感染的临床特征[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2023, 28(5): 703-707. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2023.05.012 .
[29]
王盈红, 曹小彩, 宋文涛, 等. 细菌和病毒混合感染对儿童社区获得性肺炎的影响[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2016, 34(5): 342-347. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2016.05.006 .
[30]
朱玲, 柏振江. 氧疗的方式及升级的时机[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2023, 30(4): 247-251. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2023.04.002 .

Footnotes

所有作者均声明无利益冲突。

PDF(709 KB)
HTML

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/