A quality improvement study on improving the follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge
CHANG He-Sheng, YANG Xue, JU Jun, XU Wen-Ya, WU Di, WAN Xiao-Man, LI Zheng-Hong
Department of Pediatrics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College/State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases Beijing 100730 China
Abstract：Objective To explore the measures to improve the follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these measures using quality improvement methodology. Methods The follow-up status of preterm infants discharged from March to May 2017 was used as the baseline before quality improvement, and a specific quality improvement goal for the follow-up rate was proposed. The Pareto chart was used to analyze the causes of follow-up failure, and a key driver diagram was constructed based on the links involved in improving follow-up rate. The causes of failure were analyzed to determine the key links and intervention measures for quality improvement, and the follow-up rate was monitored weekly using a control chart until the quality improvement goal was achieved. Results The follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge was 57.92% (117/202) at baseline before quality improvement, and the quality improvement goal was set to increase the follow-up rate of preterm infants from baseline to more than 80% within 12 months. The Pareto chart analysis showed that the main causes of follow-up failure were deficiencies in follow-up file management and irregular follow-up times (33.70%, 31/92), insufficient follow-up education and poor communication (25.00%, 23/92), and the inability to meet the diverse needs of parents (18.48%, 17/92). Based on the key links for quality improvement and the main causes of follow-up failure, the following intervention measures were adopted: (1) strengthen follow-up publicity and education; (2) build a follow-up team; and (3) establish a follow-up platform and system. The control chart indicated that with the implementation of the above intervention measures, the weekly follow-up rate increased to 74.09% (306/413) in July 2017 and 83.09% (511/615) in December 2017, finally achieving the quality improvement goal. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the follow-up rate of preterm infants fluctuated between 23.54% (460/1 954) and 70.97% (1 931/2 721), and subsequently, it returned to pre-pandemic levels starting in February 2023. Conclusions The application of quality improvement methodology can help to formulate intervention measures based on the main causes of follow-up failure, thereby improving the follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge. This quality improvement method is feasible and practical and thus holds promise for clinical application.
CHANG He-Sheng,YANG Xue,JU Jun et al. A quality improvement study on improving the follow-up rate of preterm infants after discharge[J]. CJCP, 2025, 27(2): 148-154.
MacDorman MF, Matthews TJ, Mohangoo AD, et al. International comparisons of infant mortality and related factors: United States and Europe, 2010[J]. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2014, 63(5): 1-6. PMID: 25252091.
Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9832): 2162-2172. PMID: 22682464. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4.
Spittle A, Orton J, Anderson PJ, et al. Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 2015(11): CD005495. PMID: 26597166. PMCID: PMC8612699. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub4.
L Orton J , McGinley JL, Fox LM, et al. Challenges of neurodevelopmental follow-up for extremely preterm infants at two years[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2015, 91(12): 689-694. PMID: 26513630. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.09.012.
Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines: a clinical quality improvement[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2009, 9: 32. PMID: 19624847. PMCID: PMC2734741. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-32.
Oshiro BT, Henry E, Wilson J, et al. Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 113(4): 804-811. PMID: 19305323. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819b5c8c.
Donovan EF, Lannon C, Bailit J, et al. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 360/7-386/7 weeks' gestation[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 202(3): 243.e1-243.e8. PMID: 20207241. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.044.
