Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of preferred use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the treatment of neonatal pulmonary hemorrhage. Methods The clinical efficacy of preferred use of HFOV (preferred use group) and rescue use of HFOV after conventional mechanical ventilation proved ineffective (rescue use group) in the treatment of 26 cases of neonatal pulmonary hemorrhage was retrospectively analyzed. The oxygenation index (OI), pulmonary hemorrhage time, hospitalization time, ventilation time, oxygen therapy time, complications, and outcome of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the rescue use group, the preferred use group had significantly lower IO values at 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment (P<0.05). Compared with the rescue use group, the preferred use group had a significantly lower incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) (P<0.05) and a significantly higher cure rate (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of pneumothorax, intracranial hemorrhage, and digestive tract hemorrhage beween the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with those in the rescue use group, children who survived in the preferred use group had significantly shorter pulmonary hemorrhage time, hospitalization time, ventilation time, and oxygen therapy time (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with the rescue use of HFOV, preferred use of HFOV can better improve oxygenation function, reduce the incidence of VAP, shorten the course of disease, and increase cure rate while not increasing the incidence of adverse effects.
About author:: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2015.03.002
Cite this article:
WANG Hua,DU Li-Zhong,TANG Jun et al. Clinical efficacy of preferred use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in treatment of neonatal pulmonary hemorrhage[J]. CJCP, 2015, 17(3): 213-216.
WANG Hua,DU Li-Zhong,TANG Jun et al. Clinical efficacy of preferred use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in treatment of neonatal pulmonary hemorrhage[J]. CJCP, 2015, 17(3): 213-216.
Dufourq N, Thomson M, Adhikari M, et al. Massive ulmonary hemorrhage as a cause of death in the neonate: a retrospective review[J]. S Afr Med J, 2004, 94(4): 299-302.
[2]
Froese AB, Kinsella JP. High frequency oscillatory ventilation: lessons from the neonatal/pediatric experience[J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(3 Suppl): S115-S121.
Boros SJ, Mammel MC, Coleman JM, et al. Comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and high-frequency jet ventilation in cats with normal lungs[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 1989, 7(1): 35-41.
[6]
Jackson JC, Truog WE, Standaert TA, et al. Effect of highfrequency ventilation on the development of alveolar edema in premature monkeys at risk for hyaline membrane disease[J]. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1991, 143(4 pt 1): 865-871.
[7]
Bhuta T, Clark RH, Henderson-Smart DJ. Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation vs. conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001, 1: CD002974.
[8]
HIFO Study Group. Randomized study of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome[J]. J Pediatr, 1993, 122(4): 609-619.
[9]
Prashanth GP. Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates playing devils advocate[J]. Indian Pediatr, 2012, 49(11): 927.
[10]
Al Ethawi Y. Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants[J]. J Clin Neonatol, 2012, 1(3): 121-123.
[11]
Prashanth GP, Malik GK, Singh SN. Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm neonates: a preliminary investigation in a developing country[J]. Pediatr Int Child Health, 2012, 32(2): 102-106.
[12]
Cools F, Askie LM, Offringa M, et al. Elective high-frequency oscillatory versus conventional ventilation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patients' data[J]. Lancet, 2010, 375(9731): 2082-2091.
[13]
SOLL RF. The clinical impact of high frequency ventilation: review of the Cochrane meta analyses[J]. J Perinatol, 2006, 26(Suppl 1): S38-S42.
Kharfy TM. High frequency ventilation in the management of very-low-birth-weight infants with ulmonary hemorrhage[J]. Am Perinatol, 2004, 21(1): 19.
[16]
Luecke T, Herrmann P, Kraincuk P, et al. Computer tomography scan assessment of lung volume and recruitment during high frequency oscillatory ventilation[J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(3 Suppl): S155-S162.
[17]
Muellenbach RM, Kredel M, Said HM. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation reduces lung inflammation: a large animal 24 h model of respiratory distress[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2007, 33(8): 1423-1433.
[18]
von der Hardt K, Kandler MA, Fink L, et al. High frequency oscillatory ventilation suppress inflammatory response in lung tissue and microdissected alveolar macrophages in surfactant depleted piglets[J]. Pediatr Res, 2004, 55(2): 339-346.
