Changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block early after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect
WEI Li, LU Yong-Yi, HUA Yi-Min, ZHOU Kai-Yu, YE Qiang-Hua, WANG Chuan, WANG Xiao, YAN Song, LIU Ju-Fang
Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Abstract Objective To observe the changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) after the transcatheter closure of simple ventricular septal defect (VSD). Methods A total of 21 children with CLBBB early after transcatheter closure of perimembranous VSD were recruited. Another 21 children without any type of arrhythmia after transcatheter closure of perimembranous VSD were enrolled as the control group. The sex, age, and the size of occluder were matched between the two groups. The changes in the following indices were compared between the two groups:left ventricular voltage, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), corrected QT dispersion (QTcd), JT dispersion (JTd), and corrected JT dispersion (JTcd) on the electrocardiogram before transcatheter closure and at 1, 3, 5, 30 days after transcatheter closure. Results Left ventricular voltage and JTcd changed with operation time in the CLBBB and control groups (P < 0.05). There were interaction effects between time and grouping in the changes in left ventricular voltage and QTd (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in JTcd between the CLBBB and control groups (P < 0.05). There was also a significant difference in left ventricular voltage between the CLBBB and control groups at 3 and 5 days after the transcatheter closure (P < 0.05). Conclusions There are significant differences in electrocardiographic left ventricular voltage and JTcd between VSD children with and without CLBBB early after transcatheter closure. JTcd might be useful in predicting the development of CLBBB early after transcatheter closure of VSD.
WEI Li,LU Yong-Yi,HUA Yi-Min et al. Changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block early after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect[J]. CJCP, 2017, 19(6): 663-667.
WEI Li,LU Yong-Yi,HUA Yi-Min et al. Changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block early after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect[J]. CJCP, 2017, 19(6): 663-667.
Ghaderian M, Merajie M, Mortezaeian H, et al. Efficacy and safety of using amplatzer ductal occluder for transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect in pediatrics[J]. Iran J Pediatr, 2015, 25(2):e386.
[4]
Lee SM, Song JY, Choi JY, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect using Amplatzer ductal occluder[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 82(7):1141-1146.
[5]
Du RZ, Qian J, Wu J, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure induced by left bundle branch block after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2014, 11(4):357-362.
[6]
Maréchaux S, Guiot A, Castel AL, et al. Relationship between two-dimensional speckle-tracking septal strain and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and left bundle branch block:a prospective pilot study[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2014, 27(5):501-511.
[7]
Fukuda T, Suzuki T, Kashima I, et al. Shallow stitching close to the rim of the ventricular septal defect eliminates injury to the right bundle branch[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002, 74(2):550-555.
[8]
Yip WC, Zimmerman F, Hijazi ZM, et al. Heart block and empirical therapy after transcatheler closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2005, 66(3):436-441.
Bhardwaj R. Etiology and left ventricular functions in left bundle branch block-a prospective observational study[J]. J Assoc Physicians India, 2016, 64(9):36-38.
[11]
Deniz A, Özmen Ç, Aktaş H, et al. Electrocardiographic markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with left bundle branch block[J]. Kardiol Pol, 2016, 74(1):25-31.
[12]
Ozdemir K, Altunkeser BB, Daniş G, et al. Effect of the isolated left bundle branch block on systolic and diastolic functions of left ventricle[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2001, 14(11):1075-1079.
[13]
Zanco P, Desideri A, Mobilia G, et al. Effects of left bundle branch block on myocardial FDG PET in patients without significant coronary artery stenoses[J]. J Nucl Med, 2000, 41(6):973-977.
[14]
Mozos I, Serban C. The relation between QT interval and T-wave variables in hypertensive patients[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2011, 3(3):339-344.
[15]
Ciobanu A, Gheorghe GS, Ababei M, et al. Dispersion of ventricular repolarization in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in hypertension[J]. J Med Life, 2014, 7(4):545-550.
[16]
Rahimi Darabad B, Vatandust J, Pourmousavi Khoshknab MM, el al. Survey of the effect of streptokinase on ventricular repolarization by examining the QT dispersion in patients with acute myocardial infraction in Seyed-Al-Shohada Hospital, Urmia[J]. Glob J Health Sci, 2014, 6(7):74-82.
[17]
Bol Raap G, Meijboom FJ, Kappetein AP, et al. Long-term follow-up and quality of life after closure of ventricular septal defect in adults[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2007, 32(2):215-219.
