Abstract Objective To explore the effect of prone positioning on respiratory function in very preterm infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.Methods A total of 83 very preterm infants treated with mechanical ventilation were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to supine group and prone group. Four infants withdrew from the study and 79 infants completed treatment and observation (37 in the supine group and 42 in the prone group). Infants in both groups were mechanically ventilated in a volume assist-control mode. Infants in the prone group were ventilated in the supine position for 4 hours and in the prone position for 2 hours. Ventilator parameters, arterial blood gas analysis, and vital signs were recorded before grouping, every 6 hours in the supine group, and every hour after conversion into the prone position in the prone group, respectively.Results Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), peak inspiratory pressure, mean inspiratory pressure, and duration of ventilation were significantly lower in the prone group than in the supine group (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in tidal volume or positive end-expiratory pressure between the two groups (P > 0.05). The prone group had a significantly higher PO2/FiO2 ratio but significantly lower oxygenation index and respiratory rate than the supine group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in arterial oxygen tension, pH, base excess, heart rate, or mean blood pressure between the two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions Alternating ventilation between the prone position and supine position can improve oxygenation function, decrease the fraction of inspired oxygen, and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation in very preterm infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.
ZHONG Qing-Hua,DUAN Jiang,ZHANG Cai-Ying et al. Effect of prone positioning on respiratory function in very preterm infants undergoing mechanical ventilation[J]. CJCP, 2018, 20(8): 608-612.
ZHONG Qing-Hua,DUAN Jiang,ZHANG Cai-Ying et al. Effect of prone positioning on respiratory function in very preterm infants undergoing mechanical ventilation[J]. CJCP, 2018, 20(8): 608-612.
Jensen EA, Schmidt B. Epidemiology of bronchopulmonary dysplasia[J]. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol, 2014, 100(3):145-157.
[2]
Jobe AH. Mechanisms of lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2016, 33(11):1076-1078.
[3]
Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(23):2159-2168.
[4]
Cornejo RA, Díaz JC, Tobar EA, et al. Effects of prone positioning on lung protection in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013, 188(4):440-448.
Gouna G, Rakza T, Kuissi E, et al. Positioning effects on lung function and breathing pattern in premature newborns[J]. J Pediatr, 2013, 162(6):1133-1137.
[7]
Brunherotti MA, Martinez EZ, Martinez FE. Effect of body position on preterm newborns receiving continuous positive airway pressure[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2014, 103(3):e101-e105.
Kotani T, Tanabe H, Yusa H, et al. Electrical impedance tomography-guided prone positioning in a patient with acute cor pulmonale associated with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. J Anesth, 2016, 30(1):161-165.
[12]
Galiatsou E, Kostanti E, Svarna E, et al. Prone position augments recruitment and prevents alveolar overinflation in acute lung injury[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006, 174(2):187-197.
[13]
Santini A, Protti A, Langer T, et al. Prone position ameliorates lung elastance and increases functional residual capacity independently from lung recruitment[J]. Intensive Care Med Exp, 2015, 3(1):55-62.
[14]
Aguirre-Bermeo H, Turella M, Bitondo M, et al. Lung volumes and lung volume recruitment in ARDS:a comparison between supine and prone position[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2018, 8(1):25-34.
[15]
Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Carlesso E. Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure:impact and clinical fallout through the following 20 years[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39(11):1909-1915.
[16]
Mase K, Noguchi T, Tagami M, et al. Compression of the lungs by the heart in supine, side-lying, semi-prone positions[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(9):2470-2473.
[17]
Hough JL, Johnston L, Brauer S, et al. Effect of body position on ventilation distribution in ventilated preterm infants[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2013, 14(2):171-177.
[18]
Oliveira TG, Rego MA, Pereira NC, et al. Prone position and reduced thoracoabdominal asynchrony in preterm newborns[J]. J Pediatr (Rio J), 2009, 85(5):443-448.
[19]
Sureshbabu A, Syed M, Das P, et al. Inhibition of regulatory-associated protein of mechanistic target of rapamycin prevents hyperoxia-induced lung injury by enhancing autophagy and reducing apoptosis in neonatal mice[J]. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2016, 55(5):722-735.
Peng WS, Zhu HW, Shi H, et al. Volume-targeted ventilation is more suitable than pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2014, 99(2):158-165.
[22]
Fineman LD, LaBrecque MA, Shih MC. et al. Prone positioning can be safely performed in critically ill infants and children[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2006, 7(5):413-422.
[23]
Vasilios Koulouras, Georgios Papathanakos, Athanasios Papathanasiou, et al. Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients:A pathophysiology-based review[J]. World J Crit Care Med, 2016, 5(2):121-136.
