Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-disciplinary treatment approaches in reducing neurological disabilities in premature infants. Methods A total of 117 infants who were born premature in our hospital between March 2008 and February 2010 but had no congenital malformations and no severe neonatal complications, were enrolled in this study. They were randomly allocated to a multi-disciplinary treatment group (n=63) and a control group (n=54). While patients in the control group underwent an early conventional treatment, those in the multi-disciplinary treatment group were subjected to regular development monitoring, neurological examination and screening for brain injury, neuro-nutrition and neurodevelopment therapies, and rehabilitation training. Results The incidence rates of abnormalities in posture, reflex, sleep, muscle tone and EEG were significantly lower in the multi-disciplinary treatment group than in the control froup (P<0.05) at corrected postnatal ages of 6-12 months. At corrected postnatal ages of 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, both mental development index (MDI) and psychomotor development index (PDI) scores were significantly higher in the multi-disciplinary treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05). At corrected postnatal age of 3 years, incidence rates of cerebral palsy, language barrier, abnormal muscle tone and hearing impairment were significantly lower in the multi-disciplinary treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Early multi-disciplinary intervention approaches may significantly improve mental and motor developments and reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy-associated neurological disabilities in premature infants.
Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, et al. Is the newborn indivi-dualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP) effective for preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction?[J]. J Perinatol, 2011, 31(2): 130-136.
[4]
Back SA, Riddle A, McClure MM. Maturation-dependent vulnerability of perinatal-white matter in premature birth[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(2): 724-730.
[5]
Brown NC, Inder TE, Bear MJ, et al. Neurobehavior at term and white and gray matter abnormalities in very preterm infants[J]. J Pediatrics, 2009, 155(1): 32-38.
[6]
Titomanlio L, Kavelaars A, Dalous J, et al. Stem cell therapy for neonatal brain injury: perspectives and challenges[J]. Ann Neurol, 2011, 70(5): 698-712.
[7]
de Bruine FT, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Leijser LM, et al. Clinical implications of MR imaging findings in the white matter in very preterm infants: a 2-year follow-up study[J]. Radiology, 2011, 261(3): 899-906.
Kolb B, Gibb R. Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain[J]. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2011, 20(4): 265-276.
[10]
Johnston MV, Ishida A, Ishida WN, et al. Plasticity and injury in the developing brain[J]. Brain Dev, 2009, 31(1): 1-10.
[11]
Cioni G, D'Acunto G, Guzzetta A. Perinatal brain damage in children: neuroplasticity, early intervention, and molecular mechanisms of recovery[J]. Prong Brain Res, 2011, 189: 139-154.
[12]
Holt RL, Mikati MA. Care for child development: basic science rationale and effects of interventions[J]. Pediatr Neurol, 2011, 44(4): 239-253.
[13]
Baroncelli L, Braschi C, Maffei L. Visual depth perception in normal and deprived rats: effects of environmental enrichment[J]. Neuroscience, 2013, 236: 313-319.
