Abstract In order to reduce the serious complications associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasi veventilation (NIV) has increasingly been chosen as the primary ventilation in preterm infants with respiratorydistress syndrome (RDS). In the last 4 decades, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) has been as a main,or even the only mode of NIV in preterm infants with RDS. In the recent decade, improvements in sensors and nasalairway interfaces have resulted in the introduction of a variety of other new types of NIV, such as nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP). Subsequent studies have shown thatsome new modes may be more superior to NCPAP in preterm infants with RDS. In order to further understand theapplication of various NIV modes, we review literatures about all kinds of NIV as a primary mode of ventilation inpreterm infants with RDS.
CHEN Xin,PAN Jia-Hua. Current application of noninvasive ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. CJCP, 2014, 16(11): 1177-1182.
CHEN Xin,PAN Jia-Hua. Current application of noninvasive ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. CJCP, 2014, 16(11): 1177-1182.
Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, et al. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure[J]. N Engl J Med, 1971, 284(24):1333-1340.
[2]
Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants-2013 update[J]. Neonatology, 2013, 103(4):353-368.
[3]
Kieran EA, Twomey AR, Molloy EJ, et al. Randomized trial of prongs or mask for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2012, 130(5):e1170-e1176.
[4]
Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2009, 98(9):1412-1415.
[5]
SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Finer NN, Carlo WA, et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(21):1970-1979.
[6]
Dani C, Corsini I, Bertini G, et al. The INSURE method in preterm infants of less than 30weeks' gestation[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2010, 23(9):1024-1029.
[7]
Leone F, Trevisanuto D, Cavallin F, et al. Efficacy of INSURE during nasal CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Minerva Pediatr, 2013, 65(2):187-192.
[8]
Ramanathan R, Sekar KC, Rasmussen M, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation:a randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Perinatol, 2012, 32(5):336-343.
Shi Y, Tang S, Zhao J, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2014, 49(7):673-678.
[11]
Tang S, Zhao J, Shen J, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Indian Pediatr, 2013, 50(4):371-376.
[12]
Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, et al. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(7):611-620.
[13]
Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Pediatrics, 2011, 127(2):300-307.
[14]
Kahramaner Z, Erdemir A, Turkoglu E, et al. Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants after extubation[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014, 27(9):926-929.
[15]
Bisceglia M, Belcastro A, Poerio V, et al. A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants[J]. Minerva Pediatr, 2007, 59(2):91-95.
Gizzi C, Papoff P, Giordano I, et al. Flow-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for infants <32 weeks' gestation with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Crit Care Res Pract, 2012, 2012:301818.
[19]
Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, et al. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome:a randomized, controlled, prospective study[J]. J Pediatr, 2007, 150(5):521-526.
Bhandari V, Gavino RG, Nedrelow JH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS[J]. J Perinatol, 2007, 27(11):697-703.
[22]
Dumpa V, Katz K, Northrup V, et al. SNIPPV vs NIPPV:does synchronization matter? [J]. J Perinatol, 2012, 32(6):438-442.
[23]
O'Brien K, Campbell C, Brown L, et al. Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure(BP-NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams:a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2012, 12:43.
[24]
Ricotti A, Salvo V, Zimmermann LJ, et al. N-SIPPV versus bi-level N-CPAP for early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013, 26(13):1346-1351.
[25]
Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome:a randomised control trial[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2010, 95(2):F85-F89.
Victor S. EXTUBATE:a randomised controlled trial of nasal biphasic positive airway pressure vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure following extubation in infants less than 30 weeks' gestation:study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2011, 12:257-264.
[29]
DiBlasi RM. Neonatal noninvasive ventilation techniques:do we really need to intubate? [J]. Respir Care, 2011, 56(9):1273-1294.
[30]
Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants[J]. J Pediatr, 2013, 162(5):949-954.
Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine LA, et al. Humidified high flow nasal cannulae:current practice in Australasian nurseries, a survey[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2012, 48(2):106-113.
[33]
Ojha S, Gridley E, Dorling J. Use of heated humidified highflow nasal cannula oxygen in neonates:a UK wide survey[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2013, 102(3):249-253.
[34]
Colaizy TT, Younis UM, Bell EF, et al. Nasal high-frequency ventilation for premature infants[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2008, 97(11):1518-1522.
[35]
Carlo WA. Should nasal high-frequency ventilation be used in preterm infants? [J]. Acta Paediatr, 2008, 97(11):1484-1485.
[36]
Stein H, Howard D. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates weighing <1500 grams:a retrospective analysis[J]. J Pediatr, 2012, 160(5):786-789.
